Oceania Regatta REVIEW from first-timer, Awe of Alaska 6/30/17-7/7/17

I submitted the text below as a formal review on CC a week ago. Today I finally got an email telling me it was published, and gave me a link to it, though looking at CC, it is actually not published and the link does not show it either.

I am not sure if CC will ever get it up, so rather than waste my writing efforts, I am submitting it as a series of sequential posts on this forum (it is too long to submit in one chunk):

Awesome Alaska, less than awesome Oceania Regatta dining (3 stars)

My husband and I have done roughly a dozen cruises on various luxury lines, and I have done two others on mainstream line Holland America (including in a Neptune Suite), so the review below compares the cruise on this “upper premium" ship with prior, different style experiences. We have not previously sailed a line labeled “upper premium” and were curious to compare with luxury lines. We were in a Penthouse Suite which was comparably sized to Seabourn, Silversea, Regent, and Hapag-Lloyd base veranda suites. It had an assigned butler/stewardess team.

Overall, we were not very impressed, primarily because of the mediocre food. We had originally booked this 7-day test cruise over the 4th of July holiday based on a recommendation for Oceania’s reputation for excellent food, and after the cruise, are mystified how that reputation came about.

We also could discern the difference between “upper premium” and “luxury” cruising in other areas as well.

EMBARKATION

Overall, no major problems. We embarked around 12:30 for the cruise, which was leaving at 5 PM. We could have embarked as early as 11AM. Lines were very short, and after surrendering our larger luggage pieces and going through security, we were on board within 30 minutes. We ate an embarkation luncheon at the Terrace Grill buffet, and indoor/outdoor venue, which was very crowded, open “seat yourself”. Food was nothing special (a lot of hard, over-cooked meats, very limited salad choices, bland desserts) and a bit on the cafeteria side of quality, with service to match. We were allowed into our cabin a little after 2. Luggage appeared one piece at a time (two were brought to the cabin by different valets, one was left in the hall, where many other pax suitcases were also lined up, as our deck included both PH and non-PH cabins). A bottle of chilled Jacquard champagne greeted us in the penthouse suite cabin, and our butler introduced himself soon thereafter.

Muster was at 4, took about 45 minutes, and involved both a sit-down lecture in the main lounge venue (Regatta Lounge) then filing out to the deck to one’s muster station wearing life jackets, then standing around. At sailaway the ship’s band of five talented men played excellent bluesy music to a surprisingly small audience at the very small pool. There were no sail-away snacks or free drinks handed out. A couple waiters went around offering weak fruit/alcohol drinks, for $10 each plus 18% mandatory service charge to the few pax who were standing around (sign for the drink while standing up, after presenting your room card).

DEMOGRAPHICS AND AMBIENCE.

Mean age seemed around 55-60, with wide variance, which surprised us as we’d heard Oceania has many old pax. We were told almost all of the 650 or so mostly healthy-appearing pax on board held American passports, as did we, though based on the languages spoken I heard, a few of these were foreign-born. There were quite a few middle-aged people, and the younger adults (a few of whom I would call “dudes”) and 44 children on board traveling with extended family thus skewed the mean age downwards. There was a handful of mobility-impaired pax, but much less than I saw on prior Alaska cruises with Silversea and Holland America. I didn’t see any obvious solos on board (not surprising, as the prices are solo-unfriendly).

Dress code: There were no formal nights or formal optional nights. During the day in all dining venues, and in the Terrace Grill at night, the designated dress code was resort casual. This meant that some people wore resort casual, some wore casual casual, and others wore hoodies and/or baseball caps set forwards or backwards. A few wore wrinkled shirts, or tops with writing on them saying important things like “be kind” or “go for it.” Sports-team related shirts and caps were also popular. In the MDR and specialty restaurants at dinner, most wore elegant casual at dinner, a few wore a jacket, usually without a tie.

The CD was a friendly woman who unfortunately made announcements that were broadcast to all venues about many different things several times a day, so we dreaded when she would come on the overhead. Announcements were excessively detailed and included too much information about activities that only a minority of pax would likely be interested in (e.g., info about the “snowball jackpot bingo session”, and “name that tune”) and which we definitely did not want to hear at noon when we sat down to lunch in the MDR at noon to try and enjoy the calm venue.

Officers were European, crew seemed to be mostly Filipino (including a mumbling assistant sommelier who seemed to be on duty for all dining areas), Indonesian, and Indian, there were also some eastern Europeans and a smattering of others, e.g., a non-smiling South African woman at the Destinations desk. Crew wore name tags which indicated what country they were from.

DECOR AND COMFORT

This is a very comfortable, clean, well-maintained ship. There was comfortable, or very comfortable, furniture in all venues. There was a soft but supportive bed in our room, with an equally pleasant sofa. MDR chairs were simply heaven for my muscles and bones (I struggle with the hard chairs and sofas on Seabourn), and were plush on the bottom, top and everywhere else. The decor was a bit old-fashioned aesthetically, and tried to simulate an old European hotel, e.g., with pictures of odd Renaissance figures scattered here and there including in the public toilet areas, but also had some art which showed distorted pictures of women a la Picasso, alternating with calm seascapes. None of odd art impaired our enjoyment of the cruise.

The pool was small and sometimes occupied by loud children (e.g., while we approached the Sawyer Glacier, even when overhead announcements and loud talking were banned). It was surrounded by two hot tubs, often used by larger groups. The only other hot tub in a more private area was near the spa area itself and was very nice, large, sparsely used, and was accessible without cost to PH suite and above pax, and charged out at $25/person/day to others, or for use when pax had a spa appointment. DH used it a lot.

CABIN Penthouse Suite, forward in the bow

The PH suite was listed as having 332 square feet, had a balcony, and was as expected. It was clean and spacious with a soft but supportive comfortable queen bed, 3-seater sofa, table and 2 chairs. The suite bathroom was ok, a combination tub/shower with a retractable clothesline, one deep sink, and Bulgari toiletries. There was an immobile glass partition blocking off half of the tub, which made it awkward to put in the bathtub stopper before filling the tub (you either had to climb into the tub, or contort your body). There were two welcome and well-positioned grab bars plus ribbing at the bottom of the tub, minimizing fall risk. It was hard to get our full-size suitcases to fit under the bed, but we managed (or could have asked the butler to help).

Closet space was more than adequate for our week’s worth, or more, of stuff, though it was not a walk-in. The balcony had two cushionless adjustable chairs and a table, but no lounger. There were two oddly shaped footstools which were too low and flimsy for us to use. The balcony rail was metal with interrupted horizontal sections, so you could see the view through them when sitting down. Sound insulation was good, so we did not hear our neighbors through the walls. Though we were far up in the bow, near the bridge, we heard no noise from there, and the ride was smooth (but so were the seas). There were two thin cashmere blankets for our use. Linens and pillows were soft and luxurious. There was a small TV perched up and sidewards to the bed and sofa with basic cable channels, but you could not see your account or restaurant menus on the TV. The suite included butler service, which did not mean much for us. He brought afternoon “canapés" at 5 PM, which came from the same offered list every day, (you could pick two per couple from the list) and consisted of tiny portions of BBQ chicken wings, or tea style mini sandwiches with dried out bread, tiny celery sticks with blue cheese dip, or assorted other forgettable items like guacamole and salsa with taco shell chips that were not crispy. There was a small non-fluorescent clock on the counter.

Amenities of the PH suite included rights to reserve 2 nights at each of the specialty restaurants, pressing of 4 garments, butler assistance with packing, unpacking, shoe shining, and booking dining reservations and excursions, rights to have hot and not just cold breakfast room service, as well as potential to have en-suite course by course dinner service. We passed on all of this, did not need a butler, just enjoyed the PH space.

FOOD AND BEVERAGE: This was mostly mediocre, which was surprising, based on the internet Oceania food build-up we’d read. Perhaps the food on the Riviera and Marina are awesome, or this was an off week for the chef. But for whatever reason, on this cruise almost every meal (some exceptions) was disappointing at breakfast, lunch, dinner, tea time, and at en-suite canapés. Food was mostly uninteresting and not particularly innovative. Portions were large compared with luxury cruise lines, and generally more than we wanted, especially with the quality of the food.

The two specialty, by-reservation restaurants are the Polo Grill (steak place) and Toscana (Italian). The Polo Grill, which we tried once, had good but not “oh my God” steak and prime rib, and was not as good as Seabourn’s Thomas Keller Grill. Toscana, which we also tried once, had a very large menu, and offered so-so pasta dishes (we had a trio of them as an entree and another as an appetizer), a special was salmon (overcooked). Especially poor was the lobster risotto style dish. The best thing about Toscana was that it had an olive oil and balsamic vinegar cart waiters wheeled around, from which you could choose which type of oils to dip your so-so bread in. The waiters also had fun Italian accents and sounded like Formula One or Moto-GP drivers doing post-race interviews.

The Terrace Grill is the indoor/outdoor seat yourself buffet venue, and it has great views and comfortable chairs. Unfortunately, it also exuded a hectic atmosphere breakfast, lunch and dinner. It served “cafeteria-plus" quality food, often with meat hot dishes where the meat was overcooked. Fish was usually overcooked or forgettable. Lamb stew in the MDR had hard, dried out meat, and a veal stew concoction at the Terrace Grill on French buffet night also had chewy hard veal.

The “French” buffet night at the Terrace Grill was ridiculous: hard meats, no French-style white baguettes, they were out of creme brûlée by 8PM, cream puffs tasted like they had cream from a commercial squirt bottle instead of freshly whipped cream, there were only 3 cheeses and they were all Italian, and the only thing authentically French was the bad service and waiters’ annoyed attitudes. Bizarrely, the same night, there were also sushi offerings. We returned to the room feeling annoyed and discovered the butler had left us a little bowl of partially broken potato chips as an evening “treat”. What’s worse is that the chips were sadly welcome after our disappointing dinner, and we devoured them.

Coffee was drinkable or good in almost all venues (and included the option of serve-yourself coffee machines in Horizons, the equivalent of the Observation Lounge on Seabourn, where sleepy people lined up early in the morning to watch others fumble with the machines, or from Barrista the coffee bar, where they also lined up, similar to the way they do in Seabourn Square. Mixed drinks were weak and expensive and a poor value without a so-called “drinks package". One ounze of Calvados was $10 + 18% mandatory service charge, again, even if service was mediocre or poor. Wine purchased on board without a “drinks package” was heavily marked up (e.g., a $40/bottle retail wine, likely purchased for much less by the cruise line, was billed out at $90 plus mandatory 18% service charge). Soft drinks and waters, plus basic coffee and tea (in bags) and juices (from concentrate, not freshly squeezed) were included in the cruise fare. Wine service was generally cumbersome: first you had to wait for a waiter to come by and ask for the wine list, then wait to get the wine, then at the end find a waiter wait to pay for the wine with your card. You were better off just quickly picking the white or red wine by the 4-5 ounce glass for the day.

After experimenting with the Terrace Grill and two specialty venues, we gave up and took as many meals as possible in the MDR. There was a very nice red pepper soup, and an ok pasta with pancetta for lunch in the MDR, but mostly the food was forgettable even though the views from the dining rooms were very nice and there were many tables for two.

The best dish there was dubbed a “Taste from Red Ginger”, the Asian restaurant on the larger Oceania ships, called pork luc lac, though DH must have been allergic to an ingredient as he broke out in hives 2 hours later. I also enjoyed a vichyssoise appetizer, and the Duck L’orange was decently flavored, though it had some gristle. Lunch in the MDR often featured a special of the day “tastes of the world” with an offering of various dishes from other countries, e.g., Mexico, Greece, Morocco, India. Of those we had, they were usually ok, not stellar. An angus burger with fries was a basic burger, not gourmet. A caesar salad was a basic caeser, with nothing to distinguish it. Most soups lacked flavor. Desserts called “mousse” were mostly just puddings, ice cream was generic. A “Jacques” poached salmon with rice pilaf was a disgrace, and consisted of two slabs of deflavored overboiled salmon sitting on a plate next to a blob of rice without anything else in it that was called “rice pilaf”, and overcooked green beans. The uninspired presentation and bland flavors were well-suited to a nursing home. A Wienerschnitzel entree the last night, in addition to being overcooked (as usual) had a weird aftertaste resembling old cooking oil. Creme brulee was excellent. Morning small croissants were pretty good. Most of the danish and other morning pastries were not. Only one type of bread other than breadsticks was not rubbery.

SERVICE

The cruise was not “all inclusive”, so it was made clear we would be charged $16/person/day plus $7/person/day for the butler on top of our PH suite cruise fare plus 18 percent for anything bought on board including alcohol not part of a "package". Nor was there a system (as is done on Hapag Lloyd) where you could just verbally give your cabin number for drinks ordered without having to pull out your room key card from its pouch and then sign. You had to sign for the cost of drinks, plus the mandatory 18% service charge. This was annoying and disruptive, e.g., if we were listening to a show, or standing up somewhere, or were in a hurry to leave after eating but needed to pay for the alcohol brought previously, or had poor service.

We had no complaints about our PH butler, who was fine, he had previously served on luxury lines, but he did not need to do much for us.

We had brought 3 nice CA wines on board (legal, per policy) which we had served to us for a $25 surcharge at dinner. It was repeatedly a challenge to get dining room personnel to get around to opening our bottles so the wine could breathe while we waited for our food, even though personnel clearly saw the bottles on our table after we arrived. Apparently only the sommelier is allowed to open bottles brought on board.

Some waiters were smart-alecky, e.g., one in the Polo Grill offered us "Crystal Geyser water, vintage 2017”, after we sat down and he saw our bottle of high end Napa cab we had put on the table. Too many personnel (usually from eastern Europe) were sullen or acted bored and overworked.

Service at lunch in the MDR and dinner was on average better than at the Terrace Grill. Language barriers sometimes contributed to confusion. At breakfast, lunch, and dinner in the Terrace Grill service was poor, to match the chaotic atmosphere and food, with either delays, mix-ups, oversights, or attitude, which created a sense of dread going there, as with a negatively conditioned Pavlovian dog. The mostly Filipino or other Asian crew who dished out the Terrace Grill food, however, (for alleged hygienic purposes, they spooned everything out for pax, with rare exceptions pax could not serve themselves), were pleasant and eager, though English communication skills were variable.

On a day when we were in port, in Sitka, we went to eat lunch in the MDR, and everyone eating there got deliberately seated bunched up in one quarter of the dining room’s space, which created a louder and more crowded atmosphere, and did not utilize all the window seats. This arrangement was surely more convenient for the waiters. Unfortunately. that still did not help the waiters keep the orders straight.

When we got off the ship in Ketchikan, while waiting pierside before our excursion, we watched the remaining pax attempt to disembark: they had a long wait, as there was only one crew member manning the room card clicking device and station, and he worked slowly. At 35 minutes, pax were still in line waiting to get off into port.

ENTERTAINMENT AND OTHER OFFERED ACTIVITIES

Entertainment was good for such a small ship, though the floor in the Regatta Lounge, which is the main venue, is barely sloped, so it is hard to see the stage from many seats. The 5-man band was skilled, especially the sax player. The 3 women and 3 male singer/dancers did a decent job on their production numbers. There was a comedian from NJ named Tom Drake who was a bit low-brow but very funny -- even though there were hardly any people from NJ or NY on the cruise compared with Seabourn, (based on “where you from” applause). There were a few Floridians, and a lot of Californians, like us. We learned Tom Drake is married to the CD. There was a funny magician-pickpocket, Bob Arno. There was a classical music string quartet that played at teatime, but pax mostly just crowded into the Horizons lounge to feed on the mediocre cakes, and to loudly talk about various things like their card game hands, relatives, or food preferences, rather than to listen to the music, so the musicians were drowned out. On the first sea day, people were crowding the door to the entrance, and had difficulty finding seats where they could drink their bagged (not loose leaf) teas.

The fitness center is large, and was crowded on sea days. Some of the equipment was at times broken and no one was around to fix it. DH who came regularly, was sometimes able to gain access to a piece of non-functioning equipment by fixing it himself. There was a casino, shuffleboard, golf putting, trivia, ping pong, bridge, needlepoint, zumba, poker, jewelry “education”, as well as a former electrical engineer turned metals expert who gave an interesting talk about gold, both in and out of Alaska. In case you felt tempted to drink alcohol and weren’t supposed to, there was also a Friends of Bill W. get-together. There were surprisingly very few enrichment lectures, though this was a cruise to Alaska.

DVDs are available for rental at reception (a thousand). Internet worked ok for a cruise, we had opted for unlimited service, got to use one device at a time. There are also “packages” you can buy.

The spa is in the bow, very pretty, though they played loud annoying overhead music in the manicure and hair service area (as they did in the restaurants), as that is what the humming-along personnel like to listen to. DH had a good massage. I had a painful and mediocre manicure/pedicure with a somewhat unhappy young lady.

We went to an hour long Italian wine tasting ($75 per person) where a couple dozen of us tasted roughly one ounze each of representative Italians wines paired with tiny bites, plus an intro glass of prosecco. The head sommelier ran the session, and did a good job.

EXCURSIONS: We did one ship-run excursion at each port. They were expensive, relative to the cost of excursions on Silversea and Seabourn.

On one day, the ship sailed into Tracy Arm towards the Sawyer Glacier, after an aborted sail into the Endicott area (too much ice). Unfortunately we only got within 3 miles of the glacier, just close enough to see it in the distance but not close enough to hear anything. Some people gathered on the top deck to watch scenery, while others at the same time clanked away at shuffleboard on the top deck, and even more sat in the dirty-windowed Observation Lounge in the bow while drinking complimentary cocoa or ordering $10 plus 18% mandatory gratuity drinks. There is no outdoor area in front of the Observation Lounge, and the top deck has high glass surrounding it, so it was hard to find a place to get great pictures.

One excursion (a 4x4 adventure safari out of Sitka) got cancelled, and we had to rebook short notice.

We did a 5 hour catamaran explorer tour to Misty Fjiords National Monument out of Ketchikan (not exclusive to Oceania pax) which was nicely done by a local family, that was fine. In Sitka we did a rainforest hike at the Starragavan and Mosquito loop trails, which was a pleasant, easy walk for 2-3 miles on gentle terrain, and which we enjoyed even though there seemed to be more standing than hiking, as the guide stopped and talked way too much about plant names which no one will remember, how to use various grasses to homeopathically treat cancer, and how to tell one species of slug from the next, all of which resulted in needless chatter and interrupted the flow of what could have been a serene walk. It was followed by standing around for 35 minutes in a parking lot waiting for our ride back to the ship.

In Prince Rupert we did an overpriced excursion dubbed "jet boat adventure and walk”. This consisted of meeting at 11AM in the Regatta Lounge (along with most other pax on the ship), milling around, then getting off and milling around some more at the pier, departure close to 12 for a scenic drive on a comfortable though crowded bus with over 50 people including some “dudes”, and arrival at 1 PM in a parking lot not far from a river. We were escorted by a ditzy young guide who called herself a “biologist", but who seemed to have problems communicating distance concepts to American tourists (e.g., once she described an attraction as being “far away — about 160 kilometers, so it would be about double that in miles” [sic]). On arrival at the parking lot, twelve people then went jet-boating for 30 minutes, twelve did a 30-minute very slow stroll through mosquito-infested woods with the guide (bug spray available), and the remainder sat around in the sun waiting for some locals to very slowly, at their leisure, grill salmon and talk about interesting things like battles with the Canadian government to extend disability payments (they were just firing up the grill when we arrived) and certain American political figures. Groups then rotated through the activities, sitting on chairs either in the parking lot, standing, swatting bugs, waiting and waiting for salmon to get cooked, playing games with their kids, using the stinky equally mosquito-infested outhouse or bus toilet, until 4 PM when we were bussed back. A day after this excursion, at the end of the last day of the cruise, though I had utilized the "free" bug spray, I developed itchy red welts all over my lower body and am still scratching (there is medical debate as to whether this was caused by mosquito bites from the excursion, or occult bed bugs on the ship).

DISEMBARKATION Bags had to be put out by 10 the night before, (show at 9:30) with the usual color-coding disembarkation set-up. Oceania and port personnel did a good job keeping the flow of people moving well as we got off. We overpaid for a reserved communal bus trip to the Seattle airport, $85 per person, and were deposited in a parking lot about a 15-minute walk from the baggage check-in area for distant United Airlines ( we had to wheel our bags through a parking structure). Seattle port and airport personnel were pleasant.

SUMMARY: I’m sure this is a perfectly fine line for certain demographics, but it is not for us. The ship itself is pretty and comfortable. The key disappointment was the uninteresting and poorly prepared food and to a lesser degree, the mass market service and nickle-and-diming atmosphere. It certainly was not a good value to get a PH suite, compared with an all-inclusive base veranda cabin on Seabourn or Silversea, once we added in the cost of the PH suite itself, alcohol and other service (or non-service) with its steep markups and 18% mandatory surcharge regardless of service quality, steep excursion costs, and other extras. I thought the food was better and more consistent even on Holland America’s Westerdam, a mainstream line, at least at dinner.

And yet it does appear to be a good choice for some. Most people on board seemed to love their cruise including the food. Pax appeared to be for the most part down to earth, easy to please middle Americans enjoying a special, but casual, family or couples vacation, something that is a little nicer than what mainstream lines offer. Oceania offers a smaller ship, on average cheaper and smaller cabins per person per day, and seems to save by avoiding over-the-top luxury food and service. Entry level cabins on small ship lines like Seabourn and Silversea are more expensive per diem. Parents or grandparents can book themselves a nice PH suite on Oceania, and then put their young adult kids or grandkids into inside cabins or tiny window cabins to save some money. Then everyone can dine on the same hot dishes with overcooked meat together, and do overpriced communal excursions. Or, non-drinkers, non-gourmets, people who always do their own excursions, or people who do not need or expect individualized pampering, can enjoy the benefits of a clean, small ship with pleasant decor, comfortable seating, and decent entertainment.

DH and I, however, will be going back to luxury lines, where securing flavorful and interesting food, dining room service, ability to customize, and attention to detail, without outrageously priced extras, are less likely to be an issue (though even there, there is no certainty anymore, see my other reviews). We are unlikely to retry Oceania in the near future for these prices, and if we do, it would be on the newer ships Oceania and Riviera, perhaps the food is better there.

Oceania is definitely not for you. Nice you have other choices

Our experiences have been quite different from yours. Our first seabourn cruise, e.g., was a huge disappointment.

Sent from my iPhone using Forums

Catlover54,

Thank you so much for this review.

I personally love Oceania and will travel with them again, but I totally share some of your observations.

It's great to read non-cheerleader reviews.

I love your writing style and your wit. Are you by any chance originally from the east coast?

Catlover54,

Thank you so much for this review.

I personally love Oceania and will travel with them again, but I totally share some of your observations.

It's great to read non-cheerleader reviews.

I love your writing style and your wit. Are you by any chance originally from the east coast?

I am definitely not originally from the east coast, but moved around a lot as a child, and was raised by immigrant parents from eastern Europe. They loved life, but tended to be blunt, direct, had a sense of the absurd, and spent their first years in post-WW2 America in NYC, so likely some of that rubbed off on me :)

We were on Regatta in April and it's amazing how different perspectives can be!

Catlover54, I absolutely love your style of writing with "tell it like it is", with some wit infused! Which is precisely why we do not take 7 day Alaska cruises in the summer, and avoid Spring Break like the plague! I think you may find a more sedate, and more "typical" O cruise clientele and atmosphere when school is back in session, and longer cruise durations. We have tried SS , and had a very bad experience during a holiday cruise, several years ago, and was told the same thing by one of their regular posters, however, we have not been back to try them again (off season). It's a shame, but I think first impressions do stick with you. We tend to have 1 fuzzy weak drink apiece on a cruise, so for us, all inclusive alcohol or not signing, is lost on us. Food hasn't been that bad in the past, I assume it's a one-off, but have heard other critical observations this summer about the quality....hmmmm. Enjoy whichever cruise line you fancy...life is too short to not live it to the fullest.

https://www.cruisecritic.com/memberreviews/memberreview.cfm?EntryID=584144

You are published. Photos are lovely. I am so glad you wrote such a thorough review. I do think the food is one of big draws to O which they themselves hype. So if they don't deliver then people will move on. When we cruised the food was excellent but the service was spotty so we sail with them again of course at a much lower price point. We do carry on wine so your comments about that service is bothersome.

Thank you for taking the time to share.

Catlover54,

Thank you for taking the time to post this very complete and unbiased review.

The fact that we don't always agree is irrelevant as we all like/prefer different things.

We cruised on the new Seabourn Encore this Spring and with the sole exception of the TK Grill we find Oceania's food far more varied and better than our Seabourn experience (especially on Marina/Riviera, where one has the additional options of Jacques & Red Ginger). As many have stated before, food is VERY subjective.

At least you now know that there are other lines that suit your tastes (food and otherwise) better. It is indeed a luxury that we have so many choices. Fortunately, we don't all like the same cruise line as if that were the case they would be the only cruise line left in business and it would be difficult to get reservations :D

Enjoy your future cruises, wherever they may be and thank you again for your comprehensive review - it will be very helpful to those who are trying Oceania for the first time. I say first timers because those that have already sailed on Oceania before have mostly made up their minds - they either liked the experience well enough to return or like you, will move on.

And that is just as it should be :)

As we all say, everyone has their own perspective.

We'll be taking the same trip August 7. I'll get back with my review and comparison -- but it'll be shorter!

We took Oceania Sirena on Panama Canal last December, then Seabourn on the transatlantic in April. So we should be in good position to make a valid comparison once again.

I'm glad to see that those of us who come back to Oceania again and again can accept a not-so-positive review. So many things about a cruise are subjective -- not just the food! Contrary opinions should always be considered. (When I see a review that is overwhelmingly positive or negative, I tend to reject it. I love Oceania, but I can see its faults too.)

Regatta is the ship we've been on most, going back to our first Renaissance cruise when it was the R2) but we haven't been on her for several years. As I think about it, it's been five years! (But we were on two other "R" ships last July and October, although kitchens are different even if the menus are supposed to be the same.) While I remember wonderful cuisine, things could well have changed. I can't know if I would have had the same reaction, of course!

Wishing Catlover happy cruising in the future, wherever it takes you. (I'm another catlover myself ...)

Mura

And yet it does appear to be a good choice for some. Most people on board seemed to love their cruise including the food. Pax appeared to be for the most part down to earth, easy to please middle Americans enjoying a special, but casual, family or couples vacation, something that is a little nicer than what mainstream lines offer. Oceania offers a smaller ship, on average cheaper and smaller cabins per person per day, and seems to save by avoiding over-the-top luxury food and service. Entry level cabins on small ship lines like Seabourn and Silversea are more expensive per diem. Parents or grandparents can book themselves a nice PH suite on Oceania, and then put their young adult kids or grandkids into inside cabins or tiny window cabins to save some money. Then everyone can dine on the same hot dishes with overcooked meat together, and do overpriced communal excursions. Or, non-drinkers, non-gourmets, people who always do their own excursions, or people who do not need or expect individualized pampering, can enjoy the benefits of a clean, small ship with pleasant decor, comfortable seating, and decent entertainment.

Hehe I can relate with this statement. We are traveling soon and my friend travels the luxury lines. He recently sailed seabourn in one of the bigger rooms with wrap around balcony. He always talks about his disapointments with seabourn. Keeps making reference to how much more special his regent sailing was (in an average suite). With that said he booked a room without balcony on oceania. Partly because he will have the room to himself and partly because we believe if you have the $$ for a bigger room you should travel on a line that offers that room at entry level to ensure the food, amenities and service are to your expectations.

We do not have the same budgets as my friend. However we have always discussed going on a trip together. Oceania alows that and fills the void between luxury and mass market.

We are very much looking forward to Oceania and the experience it offers. Primarily for the small ship ambience, access to smaller ports, and good quality cuisine (we have been onboard and enjoy the food)

Thanks for your review. I found it quite helpful, as we are embarking on our fifth Oceania cruise next month after a two year hiatus. Our last cruise in 2015 was fraught with some frustrations including noro virus outbreak and several missed ports supposedly due to weather. I understand your frustration with frequent announcements. Most Oceania CDs are more courteous to passengers and do not make frequent announcements. Unfortunately Dottie Kulasa, while a nice person, is very verbose and her frequent and lengthy announcements are most annoying. I do not know why corporate has not forced her to adhere to Oceania's normal limited announcement policy.

If you enjoyed the ship design despite the weak points of this cruise, you might consider Azamara in the future. Same R-ships (completely updated last year), and IMHO better food, much better service, and more reasonably priced shore excursions (Oceania's are the most expensive we have seen, and as a result are also the most likely to be canceled for lack of interest).

If you enjoyed the ship design despite the weak points of this cruise, you might consider Azamara in the future. Same R-ships (completely updated last year), and IMHO better food, much better service, and more reasonably priced shore excursions (Oceania's are the most expensive we have seen, and as a result are also the most likely to be canceled for lack of interest).

I have indeed been eyeing Azamara, they have some nice itineraries and if their furniture is as comfie as that on the Regatta, the best on any ship I have been on, that would be very nice ( I almost ordered the mattress, as a brochure for that style bed and its linens was put it into our suite later in the cruise, around $3000, but without an 18% mandatory service charge). I would like to do a solo short "test" cruise on them without subjecting DH to it, in case it turns out a bust ( it is harder for him to take off work than for me), but they usually are not solo-friendly on pricing.

If you enjoyed the ship design despite the weak points of this cruise, you might consider Azamara in the future. Same R-ships (completely updated last year), and IMHO better food, much better service, and more reasonably priced shore excursions (Oceania's are the most expensive we have seen, and as a result are also the most likely to be canceled for lack of interest).

Different strokes. For us Azamara is an inferior product in every respect.

Again, nice to have choices

Sent from my iPhone using Forums

We have 11 cruises on Oceania. On 2 of them the food was generally mediocre at best. Apparently this is still happening on some cruises.

I blame the head chef onboard as he/she sets the bar. When they are firing on all cylinders, it's great. The best I've ever eaten? No. But very good.

Sorry this occurred on your first O experience.

And I totally agree re Dottie. My least favourite CD but many rave about her. Generally I don't care who the CD is, but if I could choose based on who that person would be, I would choose anyone but her. Also, I thought her husband was quite mediocre as a comedian. We rarely attend the entertainment, but I try to go the second last night for the crew appreciation parade.

Mo

Sent from my iPhone using Forums

We just returned from the July 7-14 Awe of Alaska cruise. The only complaint we had was the weather...rain! We didn't mind the cooler temps at all...better cool than hot.The cruise was great.

We have traveled with Viking and Royal Caribbean. This was our first Oceania cruise. In our mid-60's, we are fortunate to be active and healthy. This cruise was a perfect fit for us. We enjoyed the laid-back vibe, the country club casual dress, the service, and the food. Great seafood! The open-seating Terrace Café had grilled lobster, shrimp, steak every night..of course other options were available buffet- style. We especially enjoyed the Alaskan dinner (salmon/halibut night). Even Waves had delicious grilled lobster medallions and filet from 11 til 4 every afternoon.

The Oceania excursions are pricey. Our room was on deck 6 and included a balcony. We got a great online promotional deal in March, and we felt our money was well- spent. We took a taxi to/from the airport; cost was $43, plus tip.

We really enjoyed being on a ship with only 675 people...certainly quieter and more relaxed than with thousands of people on the megaships.

The itinerary was good, but Prince Rupert was lacking in things to do. Perhaps the rain had something to do with our not particularly enjoying that city.

We enjoyed getting up early and heading to Horizons on deck 10 to take in the panoramic view. The ship is beautiful, elegant, quiet, and designed well. Overall...We loved our cruise, and we will recommend Oceania to our friends.

The best I've ever eaten? No. But very good.

Mo

Sent from my iPhone using Forums

Mo,

This is probably true for most of us. The question is - you had better food on land or another cruise line?

Obviously, there is a huge difference between comparing cruise line food to land restaurants or other cruise lines.