OnTheJourney

Oh my. With all due respect, I'll stick to sailing with Viking, RCL, and X. Not into any sort of formal dressing for cruises anymore.

Yes. IF there's something there to see, I can see it, but of late I've been corresponding with someone who turns out to have a signature that I otherwise would have never known about. There's simply nothing there on my end. Weird.

Yes...have that turned on. I can see some, but apparently not all.

Not mine. Tried it again this morning.

In conversing with someone who is a member it became apparent that I can’t see her signature which lists pasts and future cruises. Why is that? I get the same result whether using my iPhone or MacBook.

Another reply on Trip Advisor: "A cruise ship will be fairly constrained by its port schedule, and it can't, on a whim, just sail from the Westfjords to, say, the Reykjanes peninsula on short notice. Where we were -- in Hamilton, Ontario, people hopped in their cars and drove to where the radar predicted the clearest skies."

Interesting. The recent one was 115 wide. 186 is a large area for sure. Well, with any luck. A longer-range trip to look forward to and get excited about anyway. Always seems, when first booking a few years out, that it's so far away, and then as it approaches I always find I'm not quite ready for it.

Latest response to my inquiry on Trip Advisor - this first one from a destination expert in Iceland: "I cannot imagine trying to see anything from Isafjordur. When we were there last summer, our kayaking guide said flights in/out of there are cancelled all the time due to weather. So for this summer, I made sure to have several days buffer for the trip for this reason alone, to give you an idea. I agree with the others that a cruise for Iceland is the worst way to see the country." And the other one.... "When the onland tour companies take people out to chase the Northern Lights, they are in contact with each other and can fairly get to a new location. For the eclipse, I am sure that they will have the latest sky conditions when they leave Reykjavik and know if there are clear areas. I simply do not believe that a huge cruise ship can move faster than a vehicle." So, my final word on it (from where I sit anyway), if I wanted to do this just for the cruise - which is surely attractive - I'd go (and might if it wasn't in summer), but I've ruled it out as an eclipse chase. The idea was exciting for awhile at least. That said, there's always a chance. Mother Nature ultimately rules.

That's the way to do it - really drive to wherever the weather sounds the best. I didn't have the time nor the inclination to invest that much in it, and actually hadn't thought much about the eclipse until just a few weeks ago. Too many other things happened between Christmastime and over the winter that needed full attention. Then, however, when my daughter started talking about her driving from CA to AR to see it, that got me thinking that I should make at least some sort of marginal attempt. We did, I and feel it was a worthy one with it being only 300 miles to a location either right outside or else right inside the path. We got what we got. I'll always remember it. The best way was to remain flexible with the travel plans. I saw people interviewed on the news who live in FL and decided, almost on the spur of the moment, to drive to ME since it started to look like (and turned out to be) some of the best weather in the east.

Maybe they will yet. Call 'em up. That was actually my original intention in starting the thread, thinking more along the lines of something in the Med for viewing in Spain.

...based on your experience or otherwise knowledge of the general weather patterns there during summer? Just curious. I got several replies on trip advisor relative to a question I asked about doing this: 1)Go on the cruise because you want to do that. Don’t go solely to see the eclipse as there wil be a strong chance it will be cloudy. No one can second guess what the weather may be. Iceland sits in the North Atlantic just below the Arctic Circle. It’s a maritime climate which is not stable. Cruises are not ideal way to see Iceland. There is little infrastructure in small ports to support passengers. IMHO they are a rip off.Go to Iceland by land to see this amazing country & manage expectations regards the eclipse. 2) Do *not* book a cruise to try and watch an eclipse. You lose the ability to chase the clear weather. This past eclipse, a lot of people went to Niagara Falls, paid exorbitant costs for hotel rooms, and were disappointed by cloudy skies. However, if you could drive out of Niagara Falls, there were beautiful views only about an hour away (where we were). Cruises aren't the best way to view Iceland anyway. You're much better off driving. For what it's worth anyway. I replied that I had read the exact opposite relative to chasing eclipses via cruise - that the ship (unlike on land) can maneuver to places for better viewing, which would make sense, but then I have no experience with such. I know a Princess ship got great views of the recent eclipse during a Mexican Riviera cruise. Point well taken though, especially confirming the weather issues. The one person who replied lives in the UK.

For sure.. I tend to believe it based on everything I've been reading. I was really quite taken with the idea of this cruise, and actually still am - if for no other reason than having never been to any of the places that it's going - but logistically, for several reasons, it presents some difficulties. Fall or early spring, different story. Good luck!

That'd be my pick. Here's one: https://www.eclipsetours.com/tour/eclipse-tour-55-total-solar-eclipse-spain/ Eclipse day is in Burgos. What I don't like about this guy's programs is the amount of nonrefundable money invested up front. I'd advise a good CFAR travel policy.

My apologies! I see the ones I came across at the start of the thread are all Iceland / Greenland. Maybe they know something we don't (?) I don't know. I got sort of snookered just traveling 300 hundred miles only to have totally overcast skies this past Monday (although still an amazing experience at 99.5% magnitude and right outside the totality path). Not sure I want to invest the money, time and especially the hassles I'd need to go through to have someone manage my property during the hottest part of the year and wind up possibly (again!) getting denied a viewing experience. But, hey, even WITHOUT the eclipse it looks like a great cruise, and one I've admittedly considered to use my vouchers from the Mississippi cruise...if it wasn't in August. I can't see doing it without an extension at the end, having never been in Reykjavik, but that'd complicate things even moreso for me with being away a few extra days. It's just not a good fit overall.

Hate to be a party-pooper, but I don't think I'd hedge too many bets on good visibility in Iceland. All the other cruises I came across - that are especially eclipse oriented - are banking on Spain.