kaju Posted September 2, 2010 #1 Share Posted September 2, 2010 Trying to determine what makes most sense. Is it better to go with something like the Regent all inclusive or step up the accomodations in a larger ship and just add on excursions? If you start adding excursions does it put you at the same place? Not sure how much the excursions cost yet and would be for 4 people. Also, is there a preference on the one way cruises whether to start in Alaska or end in Alaska? thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Budget Queen Posted September 2, 2010 #2 Share Posted September 2, 2010 With so many touring options to choose from, I would never go with any "inclusive" cruises, that had all the tours selected and paid for. :) It is simple to find out what is available, take a look at shore excursion lists. Factor out what your tour interests are and costs, and most important, IF they are the SAME as what is in the inclusive. Also important, is ports, time in ports, route, glacier, price. Look at everything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.