Jump to content

Carnival loses "slip-and-fall" lawsuit


tef43

Recommended Posts

I thought the settlement was quite fair, actually. None of the amounts seemed out of the ordinary. Not having ALL THE FACTS in the case makes it difficult for any of us to look at it very objectively, I'll concede.

 

This can and most likely will be appealed. It will drag on for some time IMHO. Finally, if and when it is paid it will have already been absorbed into Carnival's bottom line. 20 some ships multiplied by 52 weeks per year since 2009 . . . its peanuts by comparison to Carnival's gross receipts.

 

And, dawgonnit, those decks are slipperier than cat poop. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A "win" and a "settlement" are two different legal things. In this case, the plaintiff WON the lawsuit...it was not "settled" between the plaintiff and Carnival. The OP did indeed say "won"...some other folks in this thread started using "settled"..which would be incorrect.

 

And without knowing all the facts, it would be hard to say that it will set any sort of precedent for other such suits in the future. The very brief summary *does* say that Carnival was aware that the surface was very slippery...apparently unusually so, for a surface surrounding a pool.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I won't comment on this particular case BUT I will say that not just CCL but all ships I have been on (except, I think for Celebrity...I don't recall that being slippery...) have decking around the pools that is like ice when wet.

I do NOT understand that at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I told my adult son that my greatest fear on cruise ships is falling down and getting injured. I have seen some serious accidents on ships when people fall down the stairs or just walking around the outside decks.

 

One lady I knew slipped as she walked out onto the outside deck.

She fell and broke a part of her leg in half. That was a serious injury. I don't know if she ever sued Carnival. That type of fall can happen to anybody.

 

I try to avoid the stairs as much as possible. I hold on with two hands when I do have to walk up or down the stairs. I just don't want to fall

if my foot gets caught on something or I miss a step.

 

I prefer to stay safe than get injured on a ship. They can keep their money. My health is more important.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While I feel for the woman who slipped by accident, I feel that the settlement is absolutely absurd!

 

Why? The article says she has had six operations and more to follow. That's pretty bad. I was in a car accident. Spent 5 days in the hospital, had surgery, 3 weeks missed work and had to use a walker for about a month and a half. That was 5 years ago and I still have pain from it. Accidents can affect your life forever. How do you put a dollar amount on permanant pain and suffering?

 

I bet 99% of people would do exactly as she did. Sue and the court determines the amount.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why? The article says she has had six operations and more to follow. That's pretty bad. I was in a car accident. Spent 5 days in the hospital, had surgery, 3 weeks missed work and had to use a walker for about a month and a half. That was 5 years ago and I still have pain from it. Accidents can affect your life forever. How do you put a dollar amount on permanant pain and suffering?

 

I bet 99% of people would do exactly as she did. Sue and the court determines the amount.

 

That's a good question. How do you? As I said, I feel sorry for her accident. I continue to feel that the award is absurd. You can't put a dollar amount on any type of pain and suffering, but you can award a reasonable amount for an accident. To me, the amount is not reasonable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While I feel for the woman who slipped by accident, I feel that the settlement is absolutely absurd!
Not a "settlement," but damages awarded by the Court after trial.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sounds to me like this judge was upset that Carnival didn't act as the result of prior accidents and put this passenger and future passengers at risk. This award is meant to force Carnival to do something about it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sounds to me like this judge was upset that Carnival didn't act as the result of prior accidents and put this passenger and future passengers at risk. This award is meant to force Carnival to do something about it.

 

Yep...exactly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's a good question. How do you? As I said, I feel sorry for her accident. I continue to feel that the award is absurd. You can't put a dollar amount on any type of pain and suffering, but you can award a reasonable amount for an accident. To me, the amount is not reasonable.

 

We don't know her specifics to know for sure. But the cost of multiple operations can be in the hundreds of thousands of dollars. Assuming she has insurance why should they foot the bill? Has she missed work? Plus the unknown of what future medical procedures might cost. I don't know if the amount is reasonable or not, but you might feel different if you were in her shoes. Or would you tell the judge no thanks to 2 million? Somehow I doubt it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That seems like a lot of money to me, but she proved her case in court and won fair and square. Individuals don't often win against a large corporation, there must have been quite a lot of evidence in her favor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

A jury is normally composed of 12 ignorant people who figure that it is not their money so "lets hurt the cruise line where it counts." By the time the appeals are over and the lawyers get their cut, she will be lucky to get $20,000 which is probably what she was offered in a settlement at the beginning.

 

DON

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually, she did not prove her case in court. During discovery Carnival admitted liability. That is why the trial was only to set the amount. Appeal is not terribly likely in such a case unless a point of law is being contested.

 

Bill

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Forum Jump
    • Categories
      • Welcome to Cruise Critic
      • Hurricane Zone 2024
      • New Cruisers
      • Cruise Lines “A – O”
      • Cruise Lines “P – Z”
      • River Cruising
      • ROLL CALLS
      • Cruise Critic News & Features
      • Digital Photography & Cruise Technology
      • Special Interest Cruising
      • Cruise Discussion Topics
      • UK Cruising
      • Australia & New Zealand Cruisers
      • Canadian Cruisers
      • North American Homeports
      • Ports of Call
      • Cruise Conversations
×
×
  • Create New...

If you are already a Cruise Critic member, please log in with your existing account information or your email address and password.