Jump to content

Testing Tapatalk


boblerm
 Share

Recommended Posts

I was wondering about photo quality... It seems my pictures were much more clear when I used Tapatalk.  So if you don’t mind my doing a test here too...  🙂

 

Posted Moon from  CC on Safari:

 

BD41093F-267C-45B4-91B1-2F9AB766F880.thumb.jpeg.472f28fa18ca31f09e8dd58248ae63c8.jpeg

 

59C7EE01-D4F6-4C94-AFE0-90D55EB2A0ED.thumb.jpeg.791c367546b540f02094ff024cabd331.jpeg

 

Posted sun from CC Safari:

4642136E-5778-4D54-8129-D5726256BEE2.thumb.jpeg.99a04a4b4b5c123d0d3b6ed5c15d982a.jpeg

 

66AB81E0-FF4E-403A-A938-0A481129675D.thumb.jpeg.822d7c9b15ba182af2039f62bc21fe28.jpeg

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

2 hours ago, APDMOM said:

Safari posts a lower kilobyte version of the photo. It is not obvious in the result though.

Beautiful pictures, APDMOM. They look the same to me whether tapatalk or the web version. I don't see the letters and numbers of which you speak.

 

I am finding tapatalk to be virtually unusable since it seems that I have to log on each and every time that I want to use it, do you have that problem?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you, Bob!

Yes, I have to log in every time. It also does not load full forums. It seems to only load the first page of the threads on a forum.

Pictures uploaded on the web version of CC display with letters and numbers on Tapatalk. So, if we only use the web version, it is not a problem. I agree that the current state of Tapatalk is not what it used to be. If CC is no longer going to limit the number of attachments we can upload, I will probably just use the web version. I like that you have more font options that way too. [emoji846]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, APDMOM said:

If CC is no longer going to limit the number of attachments we can upload, I will probably just use the web version. I like that you have more font options that way too. emoji846.png

I actually like the web version just fine, I find many advantages over tapatalk.  The main reason I am interested in tapatalk is that some posters have mentioned that posting pics onboard, with slow wi-fi, is more difficult with the web version than it was with the app.

I guess we'll find out in the next few months, I see your cruise is coming up in March, we are sailing next month on Silversea.

Have a wonderful cruise!

Bob

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I actually like the web version just fine, I find many advantages over tapatalk.  The main reason I am interested in tapatalk is that some posters have mentioned that posting pics onboard, with slow wi-fi, is more difficult with the web version than it was with the app.
I guess we'll find out in the next few months, I see your cruise is coming up in March, we are sailing next month on Silversea.
Have a wonderful cruise!
Bob

Thank you! Same to you [emoji846]

Yes, it was excruciatingly slow on Equinox in December. We will see how it goes on Brilliance.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
 Share

  • Forum Jump
    • Categories
      • Welcome to Cruise Critic
      • ANNOUNCEMENT: Set Sail Beyond the Ordinary with Oceania Cruises
      • ANNOUNCEMENT: The Widest View in the Whole Wide World
      • New Cruisers
      • Cruise Lines “A – O”
      • Cruise Lines “P – Z”
      • River Cruising
      • ROLL CALLS
      • Cruise Critic News & Features
      • Digital Photography & Cruise Technology
      • Special Interest Cruising
      • Cruise Discussion Topics
      • UK Cruising
      • Australia & New Zealand Cruisers
      • Canadian Cruisers
      • North American Homeports
      • Ports of Call
      • Cruise Conversations
×
×
  • Create New...