Project_gal Posted January 16, 2011 #26 Share Posted January 16, 2011 Buried in our eDocs for our 19 February sailing it says that the Vietnam visa is available on board and will cost US$45. I will update after our cruise to confirm if the price has increased. Sue Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Albert Ross Posted January 16, 2011 #27 Share Posted January 16, 2011 Have just got off the Quest Singapore to Hong Kong - the cost of the Visas for Vietnam was $30 and for Cambodia $28 all organised by the ship. Please note that you are required to provide two passport photos and these can be arranged on the ship for $10. If you are staying off the ship overnight (for whatever reason) you will need to notify the front desk as there is a higher charge for a visa in this case. The process is very simple and seems to appy to all nationalities. When asked before people said that you definitely Did Not need photos for the Vietnam visa. Please can you clarify if they were used for your Cambodian visa instead of the Vietnam one.......otherwise a trip to the photo booth is needed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christine Frances Posted January 16, 2011 #28 Share Posted January 16, 2011 When I spoke with Le Club Voyage they said that the Vietnam Visa's were $28 and one photo was needed. We had to supply a photo when we applied for our Chinese Visa as well. (pre cruise land tour) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bpos Posted January 18, 2011 #29 Share Posted January 18, 2011 When asked before people said that you definitely Did Not need photos for the Vietnam visa. Please can you clarify if they were used for your Cambodian visa instead of the Vietnam one.......otherwise a trip to the photo booth is needed. We had to supply two passport photos - but cannot be sure if two were needed for the Vietnam visa or one for each visa. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.