knittingGal Posted March 24, 2011 #26 Share Posted March 24, 2011 Has anyone use binoculars on the tripod? We are considering this adapter. Not sure it is really necessary. http://www.zen-ray.com/shop/tripodadapter.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cruiseguy1016 Posted March 24, 2011 #27 Share Posted March 24, 2011 You'll find a pair of Bushnell 8 x 42 in my glovebox and they are excellent! And for only $70 or so, won't break the bank... Described as "the best 'pound for pound' wildlife viewing binoculars in the business. They combine value, craftsmanship, technical performance, and a nearly perfect balance of "magnification (8) x field of view (42). They have these Special Features: BaK-4 porro prisms for bright, clear, crisp viewing Multi-coated optics for superior light transmission and brightness Waterproof & Fogproof: O-ring sealed and nitrogen-purged for 100% reliable, fog-free performance Large center focus knob for easy, precise adjustments Non-slip rubber armor absorbs shock while providing a firm grip Twist-up eyecups Large center focus knob for easy, precise adjustments Longer eye relief Weight - 27.2 oz / 770 grams Enjoy! I , too, keep a pair of small, pocket size binoculars in my glove box at all times. When we cruise, they come out of the glove box and go in my (carry-on) suitcase. I have a pair of Bushnell 10 X 50. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tjroadster Posted March 24, 2011 #28 Share Posted March 24, 2011 Has anyone use binoculars on the tripod? We are considering this adapter. Not sure it is really necessary. http://www.zen-ray.com/shop/tripodadapter.html it's easy enough for me to hold the ZRS HD steady with hand. I will be curious too whether the tripod adapter is needed for this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
engrdad Posted March 24, 2011 #29 Share Posted March 24, 2011 Have narrowed down our binocular choices for upcoming Alaskan cruise to the following: Plan to get two pair. First pair will be a Zen-Ray VISTA 8X42 (for my better half) Can't decide on second pair. It is between the following: Zen-Ray VISTA 10X42 2010 ZRS HD (SUMMIT) 10X42 The SUMMIT is about $75 more than the VISTA. I would like to get input on whether it is worth the extra $75. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Excited to go crusing Posted March 24, 2011 #30 Share Posted March 24, 2011 to be honest, we bought a pair of binoculars for our first cruise ( to Alaska) & it was a waste of money, we hardly ever used them. We saw eagles in Juneau, with our bare eyes, (thanks to guides) & DH saw whales at sea ( they announce sighting on loudspeaker) But my eyesight is too damaged to see that far away, & I have a hard time lifting heavy binoculars. Ther is so much to see & do all the time, I did not want to be dragging around a heavy pair. Have fun Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tjroadster Posted March 25, 2011 #31 Share Posted March 25, 2011 Have narrowed down our binocular choices for upcoming Alaskan cruise to the following: Plan to get two pair. First pair will be a Zen-Ray VISTA 8X42 (for my better half) Can't decide on second pair. It is between the following: Zen-Ray VISTA 10X42 2010 ZRS HD (SUMMIT) 10X42 The SUMMIT is about $75 more than the VISTA. I would like to get input on whether it is worth the extra $75. Having owned both, I think summit is better built of the two models. It's slightly more compact than VISTA. The rubber armor is smoother. My wife thinks the summit is slightly lighter. To my eyes, both VISTA and SUMMIT are very clear and bright. But more experienced people may be able to tell the subtle difference between these two. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knorrisb07 Posted March 26, 2011 #32 Share Posted March 26, 2011 I currently have Bushnell Elite2, ZRS HD, and ZEN ED. They are all 8x. The ZRS HD is optically superior to much more expensive Elite. It's noticeably brighter than Elite. I have hard time to figure out the difference between ZRS and ZEN. If I were you, I would get both and see which one works better since everyone sees things differently. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kGCAL Posted March 26, 2011 #33 Share Posted March 26, 2011 we took a pair of 8x42 and a pair of 10x42 with us during our last two trips to Alaska. It's hard to imagine what the trip will be without them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lgerrish Posted March 26, 2011 #34 Share Posted March 26, 2011 ...thanks for your information on the binoculars. I don't know a thing about them and wanted to get a pair for my DH for our upcoming Alaska cruise. Ordered right from Amazon for a good price. Thanks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
larsont7010 Posted April 28, 2011 #35 Share Posted April 28, 2011 I currently have Bushnell Elite2, ZRS HD, and ZEN ED. They are all 8x. The ZRS HD is optically superior to much more expensive Elite. It's noticeably brighter than Elite. I have hard time to figure out the difference between ZRS and ZEN. If I were you, I would get both and see which one works better since everyone sees things differently. I have been thinking about getting the 2010 VISTA. Is ZRS HD significantly better than VISTA to justify the extra $70? Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knorrisb07 Posted May 5, 2011 #36 Share Posted May 5, 2011 I have been thinking about getting the 2010 VISTA. Is ZRS HD significantly better than VISTA to justify the extra $70? Thanks. I bought VISTA so my kids can use them during our trip. It's more than enough for them. I am very picky on binoculars that I don't mind spending $600 on a pair of Bushnell Elite binoculars. To my eyes, the ZRS HD is still a better binoculars, which is worthy that extra cost. But that's very subjective. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rare Gail & Marty sailing away Posted May 5, 2011 #37 Share Posted May 5, 2011 Bring pocket size ones Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dhmom99 Posted May 9, 2011 #38 Share Posted May 9, 2011 Having owned both, I think summit is better built of the two models. It's slightly more compact than VISTA. The rubber armor is smoother. My wife thinks the summit is slightly lighter. To my eyes, both VISTA and SUMMIT are very clear and bright. But more experienced people may be able to tell the subtle difference between these two. I also think the summit is slightly better than the VISTA. It's lighter too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
larsont7010 Posted May 9, 2011 #39 Share Posted May 9, 2011 I bought VISTA so my kids can use them during our trip. It's more than enough for them. I am very picky on binoculars that I don't mind spending $600 on a pair of Bushnell Elite binoculars. To my eyes, the ZRS HD is still a better binoculars, which is worthy that extra cost. But that's very subjective. Thanks for the advice. I got a pair of ZRS HD and a pair of VISTA so we both can carry a pair during our cruise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knorrisb07 Posted May 14, 2011 #40 Share Posted May 14, 2011 Thanks for the advice. I got a pair of ZRS HD and a pair of VISTA so we both can carry a pair during our cruise. who gets to use ZRS HD?:D;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FoghornLeghorn Posted June 11, 2011 #41 Share Posted June 11, 2011 I'm not going to Alaska, but wanted some for some upcoming cruises. I went to Brookstone's in the mall today and caught a sale on their brand. Lightweight 10x25 Will these be okay for scanning the shoreline and looking at wildlife close to the ship? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knorrisb07 Posted June 30, 2011 #42 Share Posted June 30, 2011 I'm not going to Alaska, but wanted some for some upcoming cruises. I went to Brookstone's in the mall today and caught a sale on their brand. Lightweight 10x25 Will these be okay for scanning the shoreline and looking at wildlife close to the ship? 10x25 is usable. But unless you spend up to $600 on those compact binoculars, most of them have dim and unstable image. If on a budget, I would rather stick with an inexpensive 8x42/10x42 fullsize waterproof binoculars Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jerseymermaid Posted May 16, 2013 #43 Share Posted May 16, 2013 I have a 10 x 50 bushnell powerview and a 7 x 50 outdoor UV sharper image. Do you think either of there would suffice? Thanks for your advice, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crusinpsychRN Posted May 16, 2013 #44 Share Posted May 16, 2013 Not the junky ones platinum guests got from Carnival! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gator582 Posted May 16, 2013 #45 Share Posted May 16, 2013 Thinking of purchasing ZRS HD 8x42 Summit. What do you think? It's lightweight, water and fog proof, etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gator582 Posted May 17, 2013 #46 Share Posted May 17, 2013 Thinking of purchasing ZRS HD 8x42 Summit. What do you think? It's lightweight, water and fog proof, etc. Anyone have comments on the binoculars above? Thanks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knorrisb07 Posted May 26, 2013 #47 Share Posted May 26, 2013 Anyone have comments on the binoculars above? Thanks! I had SUMMIT binoculars for several years. Prior to that, I bought Bushnell Elite for $560. In my opinion, it is better than the Elite, which I ended up selling it after the bushnell started fogging up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gator582 Posted May 26, 2013 #48 Share Posted May 26, 2013 Thank you. Will probably go with Summit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pdmlynek Posted May 27, 2013 #49 Share Posted May 27, 2013 Bring pocket size ones As usual' date=' we’re sailing away is correct. This thread comes up every couple of weeks. While I have variety of binoculars to chose from at home, for my trip to AK I took 8×22 Steiners, which weigh 117 g (about 4 oz). Each of our kids will had similar type of binoculars. To us, it is important that the binoculars are light weight and compact. Firstly, they are easier to hold for a long time: yes, a person can hold 2 pound binoculars for a long time, but the person wont be able to hold the heavier binoculars as steady as lighter ones. We spent a long time peering at a particular spot in the water to see a whale or a seal or some other creature. Secondly, when we were in an area where there is something to see, the binoculars were always with us around our necks, and were ubiquitous to us in wilderness as cell phones are most times; there was no reason not to have them readily accessible. Thirdly, they are light and easy to pack, taking up a small fraction of space in my carryon of large ones. The disadvantage is that the small objective wont gather as much light as a larger objective. Such compact binoculars are designed for daylight use. No advanced coating in the world will magically gather more light to brighten the view. Luckily the days in AK are long during the summers, so there was no reason to drag binoculars with larger objectives. [/color'] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TanTien Posted June 24, 2013 #50 Share Posted June 24, 2013 Anyone have comments on the binoculars above? Thanks! I have a pair of their larger sister binoculars ZEN ED2 10x43 called by Eagle Optics the "Atlas Intrepid ED" and they are terrific for the price. So I would trust their smaller brethren by extension. But it still would be best to try them out before purchasing--problem is that I know few physical places that have them in stock for trying out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now