shadowfox7 Posted March 3, 2005 #1 Share Posted March 3, 2005 Anyone have any picutes of BA 8676 on the NCL Star aft balcony. I have seen other BA's (including the ones on deck 10) and suites and outside picutures. On the deck plans it looks like the deck 8 BA is wider than the Deck 9 and 10 BA's on the stern. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sdirector77 Posted March 4, 2005 #2 Share Posted March 4, 2005 Check out cruiseone.com and take a 360 tour. Hope this helps. ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shadowfox7 Posted March 4, 2005 Author #3 Share Posted March 4, 2005 Thanks for the info. I have seen pretty much all the generic photos of the BA's. I'm looking for a pesonal photos of the specific cabin 8676 on the stern. They are slightly different from what I hear. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
immargaret Posted March 5, 2005 #4 Share Posted March 5, 2005 I would love to see any photos of the Aft BA cabins as well. We are staying in 8676 the week after shadowfox7. I agree that the BA balcony's on deck 8 aft appear wider than the other BA aft cabins, but do not look as deep as the ones up on 10. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shadowfox7 Posted March 7, 2005 Author #5 Share Posted March 7, 2005 Well NCL sure must want me to upgrade.:eek: After a 5th offer in a month for an ugrade I finally took their offer for a AD Romance Suite on the stern of Deck 10. We really just wanted to keep our BA on the stern of deck 8 but after figuring extra cost for champagne, which is included in the Romance Suite plus other goodies like cavier etc...and having breakfast each morning and dinners (both are full menus) in our room on a regular table out on the deck, first tender option in port, etc...I figured it was worth $200 per person. Never say never I suppose...Happy cruising who ever gets our original BA stern cabin! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.