diy dave Posted June 1, 2012 #1 Share Posted June 1, 2012 Has this experiment been a success, has anyone found the queues shorter and more efficient when boarding. Or is it still a bit too early to say? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ceejay3377 Posted June 1, 2012 #2 Share Posted June 1, 2012 Which cruise line are you referring too? P&O have been doing this from OPT, Barangaroo and Portside, but I'm not sure that other cruise lines offer staggered boarding. HAL didn't in December last year at OPT as far as I'm aware ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sandielle Posted June 1, 2012 #3 Share Posted June 1, 2012 Which cruise line are you referring too? P&O have been doing this from OPT, Barangaroo and Portside, but I'm not sure that other cruise lines offer staggered boarding. HAL didn't in December last year at OPT as far as I'm aware ... Princess does, also. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
diy dave Posted June 1, 2012 Author #4 Share Posted June 1, 2012 I didn't think it was a cruise line trial, I thought it was a trial by the OPT management. It was supposed to start in March this year. If it is an individual Cruise line trial then I refer to RCCL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gbenjo Posted June 2, 2012 #5 Share Posted June 2, 2012 Hi Dave It was a RCCL trial, nothing to do with the OPT management. RCCL have tried quite a few changes to the check in process in an effort to overcome the shortcomings of the terminal building itself which is the main cause of the problems. Actually it is not even Royal Caribbean staff that do the "turnaround" functions but a separate company and P&O, Princess, HAL and all the other cruise lines have different companies handling these port side operations for them. ( I actually work for the company that does the RCCL turnarounds) Getting back to your original question, yes, the staggered check ins did work, along with a total reconfiguration of the check in process. They /we have basically reversed the steps and made the actual check in first, then customs, then security, whereas before it was security customs then check in which seemed to cause more delays. There are now dedicated lines for priority check in (Crown & Anchor, & suites) which are available right from the start not like before when priority lines were only available after security and customs which meant there was no real priority lines and guests would still have to join the long queue outside the building regardless of "status". I believe there will be more changes/improvements next season especially considering the fact that the Voyager of the Seas ,with its 3000 plus passengers will create "issues" as the OPT is not designed for such numbers. Unfortunately there is no alternative berth available on a regular basis so we will have to persevere with what we have got. Believe me RCCL do not like having guests wait in line to check in for long periods of time and if there were ways to eliminate these delays they/we certainly would use them. (Any suggestions???) Hope this info helps ... enjoy your cruise on the Voyager...and come and say hello when you check in Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
diy dave Posted June 2, 2012 Author #6 Share Posted June 2, 2012 Hi DaveIt was a RCCL trial, nothing to do with the OPT management. RCCL have tried quite a few changes to the check in process in an effort to overcome the shortcomings of the terminal building itself which is the main cause of the problems. Actually it is not even Royal Caribbean staff that do the "turnaround" functions but a separate company and P&O, Princess, HAL and all the other cruise lines have different companies handling these port side operations for them. ( I actually work for the company that does the RCCL turnarounds) Getting back to your original question, yes, the staggered check ins did work, along with a total reconfiguration of the check in process. They /we have basically reversed the steps and made the actual check in first, then customs, then security, whereas before it was security customs then check in which seemed to cause more delays. There are now dedicated lines for priority check in (Crown & Anchor, & suites) which are available right from the start not like before when priority lines were only available after security and customs which meant there was no real priority lines and guests would still have to join the long queue outside the building regardless of "status". I believe there will be more changes/improvements next season especially considering the fact that the Voyager of the Seas ,with its 3000 plus passengers will create "issues" as the OPT is not designed for such numbers. Unfortunately there is no alternative berth available on a regular basis so we will have to persevere with what we have got. Believe me RCCL do not like having guests wait in line to check in for long periods of time and if there were ways to eliminate these delays they/we certainly would use them. (Any suggestions???) Hope this info helps ... enjoy your cruise on the Voyager...and come and say hello when you check in Thank you for putting me straight, boy was I on the wrong page.Good to hear they are trying new ideas. Keep a lookout for me on 8thdec, I'm the one with the grey hair. Lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gbenjo Posted June 3, 2012 #7 Share Posted June 3, 2012 Thank you for putting me straight, boy was I on the wrong page.Good to hear they are trying new ideas. Keep a lookout for me on 8thdec, I'm the one with the grey hair. Lol Oh so your THE guy with the grey hair going on a cruise.... I must have met you before then ;););):D:D:D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sandielle Posted June 3, 2012 #8 Share Posted June 3, 2012 Oh so your THE guy with the grey hair going on a cruise.... I must have met you before then ;);):D:D: LOL! Very droll. :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.