Jump to content

Joebucks

Members
  • Posts

    5,497
  • Joined

Posts posted by Joebucks

  1. On 6/2/2024 at 10:22 AM, mz-s said:

     

    The entire Virgin experience is elevated, and yes they do charge for that. The evening shows aren't just dancers singing karaoke in front of a screensaver like on Carnival for example. As I said options and choices are a good thing.

     

    I don't care if Michael Jackson himself came back to life and sang on stage there. I'm not sailing Virgin to save on Wifi costs. 

    • Haha 2
  2. On 6/2/2024 at 12:54 PM, jimbo5544 said:

    2 cruise lines (built and run similarly) vs 9 cruise lines that are part of a parent that are very different, in the way they are run, in the way they sell and are priced, in the clientele they serve .  

     

    Sure there may be challenges. However, I think we are reading too much into this. It doesn't need to be all or nothing. It doesn't need to be an exact 1:1. It doesn't need to be all brands. No, "undesirable" Carnival cruisers aren't going to overrun Princess. Most lines have your general theme of base line, next level, next level, top, etc. 

     

    Just give something.

  3. 22 hours ago, jimbo5544 said:

    The issue (may be to strong of a word) is not the desire or even consideration of doing so, it is in the complexity in the accomplishment.   Way more difficult than what RCCL is doing…

     

     

    What are the difficult barriers to overcome?

  4. 12 minutes ago, jimbo5544 said:

    which free stuff are you referring to?

     

    Well, the point was to sail Virgin, so I don't have to pay for wifi. The absolute cheapest Virgin cruise this year is $1368 for an inside cabin to do a 4 day cruise to Key West and Bimini. These conversations always turn into "well the wifi and grats are included." Then when it's still more expensive, I have to learn about the value and the food.

     

    I still don't think it's that much of a fringe opinion that my social media internet was $6-$7 not that long ago, and now it's excessively priced. 

    • Like 1
  5. As with any choice in life, there are pros and cons. Many people love to draw their line in the sand, and that is that. With all things considered, I think it is a smart move for Carnival to do this. No, not just because I base the decision off of my entitlement of being at the center of the universe. I think it is a great way for them to retain and upsell customers, something companies always want to do. Eventually, sailing the same brand dozens of times, can get old to many people. Instead of letting them venture off to the competition, entice them to stay in house on a more expensive brand. 

    • Like 3
  6. 16 hours ago, mz-s said:

     

    Cruise a line like Virgin whose business model was designed this decade - where wifi, a decent wage for the crew without being subsidized by gratuities, and decent food are included in your fare.

     

    Just because this decade likes to "feel" like paying more for free stuff is a better deal, I'd rather not limit my itinerary, ship, and duration choices, in honor of paying more to escape a "fee." 

  7. On 5/16/2024 at 7:20 PM, BlerkOne said:

    Ask and you shall receive. Starlink is raising rates!

     

    https://www.tesla-mag.com/en/spacex-adjusts-starlink-pricing-implications-for-u-s-users-and-the-broadband-market/

     

    but nobody is forced to buy. Entirely optional.

     

    Eh, I'm not usually one to complain about fees or entitlements. However, the price I pay to get internet on a cruise ship in 2024 is borderline excessive. To spend hundreds a week or go without internet seems a bit off. 

    • Like 2
  8. 8 hours ago, jimbo5544 said:

    Bingo!  We have a winner.  It does not change a thing.  I have never met a person who did not know what they paid for a cruise.  If they do not, the answer lies in the mirror.

     

    I've always said that people would rather pay more in a "single price," than god forbid having a clear, mandatory, or even optional "fee." This story only reinforces that point. I can't remember too many announcements that have seen so much universal praise, especially on something with such little substance. Just "feels" that everything is even more "single price."

     

    There's always a trade-off, no matter how many unicorns you've seen. I'm guessing some people will be scared off by the "higher price" when comparing. Many people lack the capacity to look at the bottom line or big picture. It's all about those initial feels. In lighter news, I'm hoping this will deter the price-sensitive cruisers that bring down the experience for everyone, before it encourages them to book more. 

  9. 2 hours ago, Tom-n-Cheryl said:

     

    I can't recall, do any other lines have daily limits?

     

    The thing I like about Royal is that, by being Diamond with them, they put 4 free drinks on your card/account every day - to use where you please. In addition to that, booking in a suite, I can get wine/beer throughout most of the day in the suite lounge - and, from something like 5-7pm (or 8?) they'll include mixed drinks in there too. With that scenario, I'd be hard pressed to consider adding in a drink package !

     

    Celebrity is much the same - though booking a suite with them generally includes a premium beverage package to begin with, so...

     

    Yep - to some degree, the cost of those "included" drinks on both of those lines are built into the cabin pricing. I can see if someone is not a drinker, that they might feel they're paying for something they're not receiving any benefit from.

     

    Tom

     

    I agree that Royal has better benefits and the amount of "included" drinks in that scenario would be sufficient for me, without a drink package.

     

    With that said, passing off a suite on Royal Caribbean as a sort of savings is where you lose me. 

  10. We've done it a few times, and it was overall enjoyable. Most of the time, we don't travel in a group. When we do, there's a few things I stand by:

     

    - Do not stay in the same room, when possible. I absolutely loathe cramming a bunch of people in one room. For any of its perceived benefits, it's overall less enjoyable. 

     

    - Not having to commit to the same plans. We'll do a few things together. However, this is what we're doing. You can come if you want. You can do something else if you want. Plan the important stuff in advance and communicate early.

    • Like 1
  11. On 4/16/2024 at 9:35 AM, ninjacat123 said:

    What's the difference between Blanton's and my current fav Woodford Reserve?  Smokier? Just curious on what you all think.  Yes, I will try it on my next cruise in September😉

     

    As much as I like Blanton's, there's an increased interest over it because it is hard to find. People wouldn't care as much if you could get it anywhere.

     

    At the same time, I feel blanton's old fashioneds are a sin. It should be enjoyed straight. 

    • Like 4
  12. On 4/10/2024 at 1:32 PM, Top_of_the_Cube said:

    Had an acquaintance who worked at Carnival Corp.  He claimed that since HMC is owned and run exclusively by HAL, there wasn't really an option for Carnival Cruise Line to extend their CHEERS package to that island.

     

    Of course, even if CCL did have that option, doesn't mean they would do it.  CHEERS does not work at Amber Cove, which is operated by Carnival Corp.

     

    I still don't understand. They still charge you for drinks and it goes to your S&S, doesn't it?

     

    Regardless, Carnival doesn't have to extend it to anything. I'm sure the real answer contains more complexities. They would likely need to introduce dynamic pricing because included drinks at private islands undoubtably would be a higher expense for Cheers. Only to get complaints by more people who now "know the reason" why their Cheers was so expensive, and wanting a refund if a port is missed. It sounds like more hassle than it's worth as a whole.

  13. Just sailed out of Galveston on Royal recently. Package worked on day 1. They said they could only serve certain liquors that had been taxed out of Texas, or something to that effect. It was not the full menu. 

     

    The argument against Carnival citing laws is a silly one. It absolutely is a law that disrupts their normal offering. Citing a law does not have to mean what you want it to be. 

    • Like 1
  14. On 3/30/2024 at 6:05 AM, CDNPolar said:

     

    With all due respect to your comment "which I have never needed", you just don't know when you will need it.

     

    I once said to my financial advisor when he was suggesting different types of disability insurance, that I did not plan to be disabled.  His response was that no one does plan that.  It happens.

     

    I hear what you are saying, but our credit cards only offer $2,500 per person for a covered reason for cancelling and most of our cruises are over $6K per person.  Huge loss possible there if cancelling was more or less last minute for an unforeseen event.

     

    While your statement is right in theory, there's a reason I said it the way I did. CFAR insurance is really the only thing I'm foregoing. In I don't even know how many trips I've ever taken, never had to use it. It is not something that would bankrupt me. So why would I spend more throughout a lifetime, to insure one of them? 

     

    My card covers up to $10k per person and $20k per trip of cancellation for sickness, severe weather, and other covered events. I will not pay extra "in case I can't go." CFAR doesn't even cover the entire trip either. It covers about 50-75% of expenses that wouldn't be refunded otherwise. So I'd get back port expenses, taxes, and other fees without insurance (and who knows, maybe even something a future credit or something else if I pursue it). With something I have never had to claim, why would I pay hundreds of dollars to get back 40-60% of my cruise? Those numbers do not add up.

     

    Insurance is a lifelong waste to 95%+ of people. There's a reason it is one of the few remaining things we buy that someone is getting recurring commission on. It is extremely profitable. I maintain the minimal amounts to protect myself from catastrophic loss. That is what insurance is supposed to be. Not to solve your every inconvenience. I can't even count how many times I have facepalmed about the amount of people who swear by travel insurance because after years of policies, they saved $500 or so on one event. 

     

    On 3/30/2024 at 6:13 AM, d9704011 said:

    Does that include leisure travel, in addition to business travel?

     

    Yes. Plus, I have money saved in an HSA should I even incur a medical expense. I've grown tired over the years of paying for fear insurance that got me little in return. Instead, I self-insure and pay myself in an account that is always mine. It is never denied because of how or where I get sick, or how I claimed it. 

  15. On 3/30/2024 at 7:29 AM, jimbo5544 said:

    I think your assessment is spot on.  The burgers in windjammer are the worst I ever had had on the seas.  Most was just meh…

     

    Maybe I'm a little biased because burgers and tacos are amongst my favorite foods. Getting great quality ones, complementary, and right there at the lido, just far and away does it for me. Happy as a clam. Not that I didn't find anything good in the windjammer, but I didn't particularly enjoy having the venture into the buffet for my only option.

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...