Jump to content

seaknots

Members
  • Posts

    214
  • Joined

Posts posted by seaknots

  1. 5 hours ago, Host Jazzbeau said:

    I'm sure the refugees totally understand why your disappoint is greater than their basic needs.

    not sure why you feel it necessary to shame a cc member over their disappointment in having a cruise cancelled

    ambassador & scottish government made a business arrangement to the detriment of ambassador guests. there are many other alternatives for housing the refugees 

    • Like 5
  2. 4 hours ago, tryber said:

    How it is a slap in the face to you, to give someone else a benefit?  And why is its bad thing for them to want to boost sales by offering incentives to Crystal loyalists? 

    duh - it is a seabourn loyalty scheme advertised by sb as ".......enjoyed by those and only those who have sailed with us, as members of our exclusive Seabourn Club"

     

    benefits now likely to be downgraded

  3. On 6/25/2022 at 11:03 PM, les37b said:

    you've attempted to disprove and now arguing it's simply a good idea.

    so sorry you felt my posts to be arguing 

    not my intent

    I was giving information

     

    On 6/25/2022 at 11:03 PM, les37b said:

    Maybe this CLIA could organise it 

    unlikely as it is the clia members who decided to no longer arrange testing at embarkation

  4. On 6/18/2022 at 5:23 AM, les37b said:

    Viking no longer test to board and have gone from the strictest testing regime, to nothing needing (outside of general country entry requirements.)

    viking still recommends testing before departure for all cruises as well as requiring tests for specific countries

     

    21 hours ago, les37b said:

    Not even sure what CLIA is

    cruise lines international trade association

     

    21 hours ago, les37b said:

    they are aware it's not a mandate but something they want to do

    there is no problem with cruise lines taking a careful approach by following CDC & EU health advice

     

    21 hours ago, les37b said:

    Just dont claim it's a government instruction when it's a CL preference.

    does silversea or other cruise lines say this in writing? 

    cl preference? I am sure all cruise lines want to be rid of all covid measures for crew and passengers but still need to take a cautious approach

     

     

    • Like 1
  5. 5 hours ago, les37b said:

    It is neither expressing the opinion or a requirement of the EU

    it is used by eu member states to formulate their rules & guidance

    also accepted by clia & most cruise lines to base their protocols & advise crew & passengers when in europe - saves constant checks with every country & port

     

     

    viking is not a clia member

     

     

     

    • Thanks 1
  6. On 6/18/2022 at 5:23 AM, les37b said:

    I'm not convinced there even is an EU requirement for boarding with a valid negative test result.

     

    On 6/18/2022 at 5:23 AM, les37b said:

    I rather suspect the "it's not us, it's the EU" is to lay the blame for the requirement and cost elsewhere.

     

    On 6/18/2022 at 5:23 AM, les37b said:

    If anyone can show an official EU site that stipulates this extra boarding requirement, I would be grateful.

     

    https://www.healthygateways.eu/

     

    https://www.healthygateways.eu/Portals/0/plcdocs/EUHG_Operational_guidelines_CoV_June2022.pdf?ver=2022-06-10-140149-413

     

     

  7. 14 hours ago, FengShui@Sea said:

    I have a cruise in October that I have applied five different admin fees to, so that is a total of $1,000 as the $100 fee is charged per person.

    so regent had work of 5 booking & 5 cancellation with no fee & 5 cabins blocked

×
×
  • Create New...