Jump to content

Haoie

Members
  • Posts

    1,173
  • Joined

Posts posted by Haoie

  1. I think it's been rumored for a while now, but it was just confirmed the other day on Facebook and the main website.

     

    https://www.carnival.com.au/promotional/carnival-splendor

     

    Funny thing, I was actually scheduled to sail on her in late 2010 as my first cruise. Some of you may recall she had an engine fire, needed to be towed back to Long Beach, and was out of action for months! I went on the Paradise instead [4 nights instead of 7]. I missed out in a big way!

  2. There is a poster here on CC that has decades of crew experience including being a Chief Engineer...and we hope he posts on this thread. So forget about money, amenities, etc. There are numerous life and safety rules, many of which fall under SOLAS (Safety of Life as Sea) that become a big problem for older vessels. Grandfathering only goes so far and eventually most older ships most be brought into compliance with the latest safety standards. And it gets worse for ships that must pass US Coast Guard Inspections (which only apply to ships that call at a US port) or inspections in the EU.

     

    In many cases, bringing a ship into current compliance is not cost efficient. And the older power plants are also inefficient compared to the latest systems, Older ships like HAL's Prinsendam require a higher crew to passenger ratio because of the design. So many of those older ships cost more, per passenger day, to operate.

     

    And then there are the passengers. For example, an outside cabin on an older HAL vessel might cost as much as a balcony cabin on a newer vessel (the older ships have very few balconies). The reality is that many passengers simply do not want to cruise on older ships.

     

    Hank

     

    That'd be Chengkp75 [AKA the Chief], and I see he's already offered his thoughts. Always insightful!

×
×
  • Create New...