Travelcat2 Posted June 7, 2017 #26 Share Posted June 7, 2017 Good question. Perhaps they just wanted to differentiate the two restaurants. Or, maybe because they wanted to have the decor in chartreuse and name the restaurant after the decor (highly doubtful), I guess that the same thing can be said about Pacific Rim. Regent had an Asian-fusion restaurant for a long time - Latitudes (which IMO was much better than Pacific Rim but Regent decided to give the new restaurant a new name. I find it interesting that they have not as yet changed Signatures to Chartreuse on the Mariner. It would seem that changing the menu would have been fairly easy. Perhaps they are waiting until they put in the special chartreuse decor? P.S. If I was making steak tartare, I would offer some to our cats. However, they are like me and don't care for raw meat -- only raw seafood:D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eliana Posted June 7, 2017 #27 Share Posted June 7, 2017 Thanks again Travelcat. My memory is no longer as it was but I wonder if Regent inherited the names Signatures and Latitude from Radisson and have taken a long time in Regentising them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rarin2go Posted June 7, 2017 #28 Share Posted June 7, 2017 Didn't Signatures also have a tie-in with Cordon Bleu which ended and might have prompted the rebranding? Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Travelcat2 Posted June 7, 2017 #29 Share Posted June 7, 2017 I didn't think about the Le Cordon Bleu affiliation. When Regent discontinued their association with Le Cordon Bleu, I do recall that the menu changed (still miss the mushroom soup - the new version is good but not excellent). It is certainly a good reason to change the name, Having sailed on Oceania twice and loving their French restaurant, it makes me wonder why Oceania has an affiliation with Jacques Pepin and Regent doesn't. There were many people that did not like Signatures and some that do not care for Chartreuse, so, if Regent paid for the rights to serve some Jacques Pepin dishes, I feel that it would be a hit with Regent customers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaveFr Posted June 7, 2017 #30 Share Posted June 7, 2017 One other difference is that Signatures rotated three menus on a weekly basis while Chartreuse appears to only have a single menu that never changes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flossie009 Posted June 7, 2017 #31 Share Posted June 7, 2017 One other difference is that Signatures rotated three menus on a weekly basis while Chartreuse appears to only have a single menu that never changes. Yes, the lack of any menu change is certainly a drawback on longer cruises :( We never had the pleasure of dining in Latitudes but were intrigued to find that on Voyager (post refurb) signage from the crew areas still includes Latitudes, not Signatures or Chartreuse (we were taken through the crew access following lifeboat drill). This must cause confusion for new crew members :confused: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mocamps Posted June 7, 2017 #32 Share Posted June 7, 2017 All is now clear! Thanks. I can relax - as I've got my 2 reservations sorted! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Travelcat2 Posted June 7, 2017 #33 Share Posted June 7, 2017 Yes, the lack of any menu change is certainly a drawback on longer cruises :( We never had the pleasure of dining in Latitudes but were intrigued to find that on Voyager (post refurb) signage from the crew areas still includes Latitudes, not Signatures or Chartreuse (we were taken through the crew access following lifeboat drill). This must cause confusion for new crew members :confused: Latitudes made quite an impression on many passengers. I still have the menu from there and share it with crew members that fondly remember the dining venue. It brings back great memories for all of us. The servers in Latitudes were all women which gave it a different atmosphere. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CarrieAP Posted June 27, 2017 #34 Share Posted June 27, 2017 Deleted Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
msmillie Posted June 27, 2017 #35 Share Posted June 27, 2017 I didn't think about the Le Cordon Bleu affiliation. When Regent discontinued their association with Le Cordon Bleu, I do recall that the menu changed (still miss the mushroom soup - the new version is good but not excellent). It is certainly a good reason to change the name, Having sailed on Oceania twice and loving their French restaurant, it makes me wonder why Oceania has an affiliation with Jacques Pepin and Regent doesn't. There were many people that did not like Signatures and some that do not care for Chartreuse, so, if Regent paid for the rights to serve some Jacques Pepin dishes, I feel that it would be a hit with Regent customers. Although, we like some items in Chartruese, i.e. The cheese soufflé, I agree contracting with Jacques Pepin to serve some dishes would please more customers. Angie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now