Jump to content

Conditional sailing order lifting


Recommended Posts

It means the d is getting out of the cruise monitoring business. They will still provide travel guidance to the population, but none of it is binding.

 

The cruise lines will police themselves and come up with their own health protocols. They will be bound to the ports of call's government requirements to disembark passengers.

 

My guess is that things will continue as they have been for quite some time till the lines feel its in their business interests and liability protection to lax their current health protocols.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, binro01 said:

The cruise lines will police themselves and come up with their own health protocols.

 

This isn't entirely accurate. What the CDC has said is that participation will become voluntary. So some cruise lines may decide to come up with their own, but they will also have the option to continue working with the CDC and following their guidelines.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Tolkmit said:

 

This isn't entirely accurate. What the CDC has said is that participation will become voluntary. So some cruise lines may decide to come up with their own, but they will also have the option to continue working with the CDC and following their guidelines.

And the USCG, with guidance from CBP and CDC, will continue to be able to deny access to US ports for ships that the CDC feels could pose a serious threat to public health.  That is the "stick" holding the "carrot" of voluntary CSO compliance.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmm, since the overall US rate is 1.5%, it would be hard to say that a ship with a 1.2% rate would be a serious threat to public health. Unless CDC is worried that the overall rate would go DOWN. 😄

 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, SRF said:

Hmm, since the overall US rate is 1.5%, it would be hard to say that a ship with a 1.2% rate would be a serious threat to public health. Unless CDC is worried that the overall rate would go DOWN. 😄

 

Or, if the cruise line decided to abandon most mitigation methods, as they would be voluntary and costly, and had an outbreak well above the national average.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/12/2022 at 8:51 AM, chengkp75 said:

Or, if the cruise line decided to abandon most mitigation methods, as they would be voluntary and costly, and had an outbreak well above the national average.

My post was somewhat tongue in cheek.

 

The whole testing to travel is insane.  It makes sense to keep a disease out of a certain country, but COVID is everywhere.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
 Share

  • Forum Jump
    • Categories
      • Welcome to Cruise Critic
      • Hurricane Zone 2024
      • New Cruisers
      • Cruise Lines “A – O”
      • Cruise Lines “P – Z”
      • River Cruising
      • ROLL CALLS
      • Cruise Critic News & Features
      • Digital Photography & Cruise Technology
      • Special Interest Cruising
      • Cruise Discussion Topics
      • UK Cruising
      • Australia & New Zealand Cruisers
      • Canadian Cruisers
      • North American Homeports
      • Ports of Call
      • Cruise Conversations
×
×
  • Create New...

If you are already a Cruise Critic member, please log in with your existing account information or your email address and password.