betcat Posted September 1, 2006 #1 Share Posted September 1, 2006 How about the new 50.00$ per person tax on all passenger comming or going on Alaska cruise ships. It was in the USA Today fridays paper. That will be a extra 100. dollars for 2 and 200. dollars extra for a family of 4. Add port charges and taxes. Alaska is wanting too much money. If they get away with that I bet others islands or countries will start charging that too. The price of a cruise is going to be to much. Count Alaska out for me. Time to start sending e-mail to Alaska and tell them that they won't be seeing my money. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GoinCruisin Posted September 1, 2006 #2 Share Posted September 1, 2006 Just how would one go about emailing "alaska" :p ROFLMAO!!! It wouldn't bother me... cruise prices have been LOW the last several years. It's going to take more than $50 to get the prices "expensive" again... And since I don't know the basis for this additional $50, I really can't add much... but it likely wasn't just a whim. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
betcat Posted September 1, 2006 Author #3 Share Posted September 1, 2006 I guess you don't mine paying more money to the goverment. But the goverment takes too much money now. And I forgot you have to explain details to some people. You send e-mails to the Alaska Visitors Bureau, TravelAlaska.com. No it was not a wim. The goverment did it so they don't have to tax the people that live there. As the USA today said " it is the ultimate taxation without representation". It was voted on in Alaska and past by 52%. and takes effect in 90 days. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GoinCruisin Posted September 1, 2006 #4 Share Posted September 1, 2006 I guess you don't mine paying more money to the goverment. But the goverment takes too much money now. And I forgot you have to explain details to some people. You send e-mails to the Alaska Visitors Bureau, TravelAlaska.com. No it was not a wim. The goverment did it so they don't have to tax the people that live there. As the USA today said " it is the ultimate taxation without representation". It was voted on in Alaska and past by 52%. and takes effect in 90 days. No, you don't have to explain every detail to people, but when you post something like this, a link, or a LITTLE bit of information would be helpful... If you could give us any information, that might help those of us that haven't read it to understand. As far as paying money to the government, that is a fact of life. There are MANY factors that I would want to see before getting upset over this $50... right now, all I know about it, is that it passed by 52%... Believe me, $50 is not going to stop people from traveling there, I guarantee it... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zaandam_2 Posted September 1, 2006 #5 Share Posted September 1, 2006 it will end up being much more than $50 per person. there were also provisions for a corporate income tax and a 33% tax on casino revenues. of course those will be added to the price of a cruise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stanimal Posted September 1, 2006 #6 Share Posted September 1, 2006 I guess you don't mine paying more money to the goverment. But the goverment takes too much money now. And I forgot you have to explain details to some people. You send e-mails to the Alaska Visitors Bureau, TravelAlaska.com. No it was not a wim. The goverment did it so they don't have to tax the people that live there. As the USA today said " it is the ultimate taxation without representation". It was voted on in Alaska and past by 52%. and takes effect in 90 days. It's not exactly taxation without representation, as it is a voluntary tax. Nobody is forcing you to cruise to Alaska. And honestly, if $50 a head is going to break the bank, you can't afford the vacation to start with. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
selucrey Posted September 1, 2006 #7 Share Posted September 1, 2006 Maybe the state needs the $$$.:D Because of the state revenue from petroleum, Alaska does not have a personal income tax. There is also no sales tax on a statewide basis, although counties may charge a sales tax. There are property taxes in some areas, but not all, and it is not a state tax. Alaska does not charge an intangible personal property tax. Overall, property taxes are very low. Alaska can do this because of the natural resources it has. Additionally, the low taxes are an incentive for people to move to the state. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BirthdayGirl30 Posted September 1, 2006 #8 Share Posted September 1, 2006 Just wanted to say that at $50 a head, my vacation would be $250 more expensive (three kids). That's a pretty penny, but I don't have an issue with paying it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sea_u_onboard Posted September 1, 2006 #9 Share Posted September 1, 2006 Just posted this to the Alaska thread - but thought I would follow up here. I just got a response from an email I sent to my PVP (who is a supervisor) a week or so ago. She told me the fees will be added to final payment and that I should be getting an email today from Carnival. $200 more for me - oh well. I'm holding onto the email and anything else related to this because if this does get shot down and the cruiselines don't have to pay it I want my money back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
babs125 Posted September 1, 2006 #10 Share Posted September 1, 2006 And that $200 could have bought a lot of DODs!! ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yogimax Posted September 1, 2006 #11 Share Posted September 1, 2006 I would have thought that an additional charge would only be added to new bookings. If you already have booked at a certain rate, isn't that locked in? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yogimax Posted September 1, 2006 #12 Share Posted September 1, 2006 I would have thought that an additional charge would only be added to new bookings. If you already have booked at a certain rate, isn't that locked in? Sorry, for the double post! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sea_u_onboard Posted September 1, 2006 #13 Share Posted September 1, 2006 If fees and such change they can adjust. Normally they don't as port fees only change slightly - BUT - $50 per cruiser is a lot. It's in the contract. If you were outside cancellation period then they probably would wave it - but no one cruising Alaska is within cancellation period. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
L2J Posted September 1, 2006 #14 Share Posted September 1, 2006 How about the new 50.00$ per person tax on all passenger comming or going on Alaska cruise ships. It was in the USA Today fridays paper. That will be a extra 100. dollars for 2 and 200. dollars extra for a family of 4. Add port charges and taxes. Alaska is wanting too much money. If they get away with that I bet others islands or countries will start charging that too. The price of a cruise is going to be to much. Count Alaska out for me. Time to start sending e-mail to Alaska and tell them that they won't be seeing my money. As a native of Alaska please let me say...don't let the door hit you in the fanny on the way out. As Dan has already stated, Alaska doesn't need your money and as Stanimal has stated if it's going to break the bank you should consider other vacation options.:rolleyes: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zaandam_2 Posted September 1, 2006 #15 Share Posted September 1, 2006 As a native of Alaska please let me say...don't let the door hit you in the fanny on the way out. As Dan has already stated, Alaska doesn't need your money and as Stanimal has stated if it's going to break the bank you should consider other vacation options.:rolleyes: not much of an incentive to visit alaska, if this is the attitude up there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GoinCruisin Posted September 1, 2006 #16 Share Posted September 1, 2006 not much of an incentive to visit alaska, if this is the attitude up there. Only natural when people start attacking your country... patriotism comes in many forms. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
L2J Posted September 1, 2006 #17 Share Posted September 1, 2006 not much of an incentive to visit alaska, if this is the attitude up there. Do you go for the people or the scenery/wildlife? Just because there are some a-holes in NY doesn't mean I won't go there.:rolleyes: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
derf5585 Posted September 1, 2006 #18 Share Posted September 1, 2006 FBI raids Alaska lawmakers, including U.S. senator's son from http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/09/01/alaska.lawmakers.raid.ap/index.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zaandam_2 Posted September 1, 2006 #19 Share Posted September 1, 2006 Do you go for the people or the scenery/wildlife? Just because there are some a-holes in NY doesn't mean I won't go there.:rolleyes: both, actually. i find it nice to chat with the locals. i lived in colorado for many many years. i've climbed several 14,000 mountains and traversed glaciers. a trip to alaska would be more than just 'scenery' for me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zaandam_2 Posted September 1, 2006 #20 Share Posted September 1, 2006 Only natural when people start attacking your country... patriotism comes in many forms. what does patriotism have to do with this, mr rumsfeld? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
salty dingo Posted September 1, 2006 #21 Share Posted September 1, 2006 To the OP who got so upset: this is nothing new. Cities have been taxing travelers for a long time. Look at any big city "hotel tax" and you will see what I mean. The problem Alaska is trying to address is all the cruise passengers descending into town, and not spending enough money to cover the port overhead, infrastructure, etc. Sure, they can tax tour operators, but what about the people who do not take tours, and just walk around town? Should they not share in the costs? Yes they should. I think if you dig deeper you will find a tax of equal proportion on a lot of things you already do. Why is this noteworthy? I say forget about taxes and port charges, and just look at the total price of the cruise and decide if that is worth it. If you have not noticed, an airline ticket to Europe can have over $200 per person in taxes. Maybe Alaska is just catching up to where they should be. I have no problem with that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
selucrey Posted September 1, 2006 #22 Share Posted September 1, 2006 Only natural when people start attacking your country... patriotism comes in many forms. State, GC, State. Texas is the only State that was itself an independant country.;) :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GoinCruisin Posted September 1, 2006 #23 Share Posted September 1, 2006 State, GC, State. Texas is the only State that was itself an independant country.;) :D ROFLMAO, happy hour started at noon Dan... Lucy not got smarts so good :p:p Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
selucrey Posted September 1, 2006 #24 Share Posted September 1, 2006 ROFLMAO, happy hour started at noon Dan... Lucy not got smarts so good :p:p Remember the Alamo !! Remember Goliad !! :D Have one for me, this is a looooong day.:( Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ahoys Posted September 1, 2006 #25 Share Posted September 1, 2006 The two Ahoys are going to Alaska next June. So, we'll be paying an extra $100--just add that to the budget. We're going to enjoy everything about our trip, and we won't let a new tax cause us worries. As my students say, "Stop harshing my mellow." It's Friday, I'm beginning a three-day weekend in an hour, and I'm going to relax and have a good time. Have a happy! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.