navybankerteacher Posted July 24, 2008 #1 Share Posted July 24, 2008 As I am booked on Norwegian Dream in August, I am concerned by some of the negative reviews. I am also curious about the crew/passenger ratio reported by Cruise Critic in its Review of Dream. They indicated 483 crew to 1754 passengers (that's the figure for double occipancy - if triples and quads are fully utilized, the passenger number would be 2000 or more). At 483 to 1754, there would be less than .3 crew per passenger, compared with an industry norm of .4 or better. That .1 difference applied to 1754 passengers means an understaffing of at least 175; which would go a long way towards explaining reports of unsatisfactory service. I have asked both Crtuise Critic and NCL for verification of Cruise Critic's figures, but have not received a reply. If anyone has reasonably verifiable figures, either proving or disproving, I would appreciate your posting your sources. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sail7seas Posted July 24, 2008 #2 Share Posted July 24, 2008 IF that number is correct, it seems like a very bad crew/passenger ratio. I just read an article yesterday that said Veendam (June, 2008) had 556 crew for 1,200 (+ /- ) guests. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
navybankerteacher Posted July 24, 2008 Author #3 Share Posted July 24, 2008 IF that number is correct, it seems like a very bad crew/passenger ratio. I just read an article yesterday that said Veendam (June, 2008) had 556 crew for 1,200 (+ /- ) guests. 556 crew for 1200 passengers gives a ratio of .46 crew per passenger. Using Cruise Critic's figures, the following crew-per-passenger ratios appear: Island Princess .45 MSC Lirica .46 RC Freedom of the Sea .37 Carnival Victory .39 Costa Atlantica .34 Celebrity Century .47 Queen Elizabeth 2 .51 Norwegian Dream .49 One variable is that, since bridge and engine room crew are likely to be comparable regardless of passenger load (that is one reason why lines are moving to ever larger ships), the ration of crew to passenger sholud be higher on ships carrying 2000 or fewer passengers than those carrying 3000 plus. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sail7seas Posted July 24, 2008 #4 Share Posted July 24, 2008 You didn't say what they said about crew level on any HAL ship. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PennyAgain Posted July 24, 2008 #5 Share Posted July 24, 2008 Some people who work in passenger service areas and depend on trips are complaining tips are down. If SEARCH was working...... If people can't make money, they won't work on a ship. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
navybankerteacher Posted July 24, 2008 Author #6 Share Posted July 24, 2008 You didn't say what they said about crew level on any HAL ship. They reported Maasdam with 557 crew for 1258 passengers for a ratio of .44 crew per passenger. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
navybankerteacher Posted July 24, 2008 Author #7 Share Posted July 24, 2008 Interesting question. NCL lists the passenger capacity as 2159 (probably for triples included).... and a crew of 700. On www.*****.com under ships/reviews it says 1748 for passenger size with a crew of 700. If NCL's figure of 700 crew and 2159 passengers is correct, the ratio would be .34 -- .1 below Maasdam. My concern is, that with Dream going out of service this Fall, they might be simply letting the crew shrink through attrition - just not replacing members as contracts expire. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.