Jump to content

Norwegian Cruise Line to Build Separate Smoking Area in Casino on its New Cruise Ship


LauraS
 Share

Recommended Posts

Wonderful!!! Now the smokers have their small area like the non smokers use to have. This is good for everyone...smokers can still smoke, non smokers can enjoy the casino and MORE IMPORTANTLY, non smokers can enjoy the area around and above the casino.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Right now it is apparently not planned for the older ships, but write to Mr. Stuart and Mr. Del Rio asking them to reconsider.

 

 

It is most likely an issue with casino square footage on the older ships. And the inability to install the air cleaners that would do the job. And, a matter of the economics for such a conversion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm actually surprised that NCL (other than Celebrity) is taking an active approach addressing this issue.

 

It's been my experience that the casinos on NCL are among the smokiest at sea. Other than feeling that their suites were a bit overpriced, this is one thing which kept me from booking again with NCL... and that's even with discounts which their casino offers.

 

I'll have to look a bit closer at the Escape now. The fact that this is not going to change anything on the smaller ships is a non-issue to me, as I have zero interest is any of their pre-Epic ships! Been on the Pearl and Sky (a couple of times), and they're just dated/worn/tired IMO.

 

Tom

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seems like the decision to make a separate enclosed smoking area should make both smokers and nonsmokers happy. Both get what they want.

 

Non-smokers who now invade the smokers area are now chastised, and pretty much told if you don't like it leave. Now that smokers are going to be confined to what is probably going to be a smaller space than before (virtually the entire casino with a few machines for nonsmokers) it will be interesting to see how happy they are and how many of the smokers (although they now cannot smoke) invade the non-smoking areas to have access to more machines, tables, and more space. Trust me.....we non-smokers know how you feel.

Edited by LadySpoilt
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The fact that the investment in securing a separate enclosed area kind of proves there is financial gain to keep smokers in a casino.:)

 

That's what I have been saying all along. The smoking section of the Breakaway is always packed, non smoking side.....eh not so much

 

Why do I get the feeling that it's more about keeping the Non Smokers in the casino vs keeping the Smokers. After all, the casinos were already largely Smoking, and the smokers were all happy, so why spend big money to enclose them? The only unhappy people were the non smokers who would like to gamble and draw a breath of fresh air at the same time.

 

Because, as limmie says, the smoking side was packed and the non smoking (smokey) side, not so packed. So, IMO, they are hoping that by enclosing the smokers, many non smokers who refused to enter, or couldn't take it long in there, will return and spend more time and money.

 

And, I think they tired of the "stinky ship" reputation they got from complaints about the smoke smell that permeated the atrium area.

Edited by punkincc
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seems like the decision to make a separate enclosed smoking area should make both smokers and nonsmokers happy. Both get what they want.

 

Non-smokers who now invade the smokers area are now chastised, and pretty much told if you don't like it leave. Now that smokers are going to be confined to what is probably going to be a smaller space than before (virtually the entire casino with a few machines for nonsmokers) it will be interesting to see how happy they are and how many of the smokers (although they now cannot smoke) invade the non-smoking areas to have access to more machines, tables, and more space. Trust me.....we non-smokers know how you feel.

 

It will be interesting to see where they put this new enclosed area. I can only reference Getaway. Wasn't there an area off to one side that had card tables? It always struck me it wasn't ever full and on the opposite side of the restaurant on the deck below.

 

The main complaint will likely be about the choices available in the new confined area. On other ships I've ventured to non smoking slots to get variety, but don't always stay there long.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It will be interesting what the find out when they see the new smoking section on the Escape. Will they see a lot of smokers crammed in there or will they see a small amount of people. I think what they do see, will have an impact as to what we might see on the smaller ships in the future. If they see that there are very few smokers, then I would venture to guess that they might go non-smoking on the ships that they won't be retrofitting.

 

What I do like, is that it will not just be an open section on the Escape, but a walled off room, which should corral the smoke in that area. I do, however, feel sorry for the crew members who have to work in there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great compromise! I hope it works out. In the spirit of elevating cleanliness & quality of space (per Mr. Del Rio in his recent USA Today interview/article), cleaning up the air we breathe is imperative. Seriously. On the Getaway when we walked past the atrium just as you got by the guest services area the stale smell would pick up. The air carries it so far. Very off-putting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why do I get the feeling that it's more about keeping the Non Smokers in the casino vs keeping the Smokers. After all, the casinos were already largely Smoking, and the smokers were all happy, so why spend big money to enclose them? The only unhappy people were the non smokers who would like to gamble and draw a breath of fresh air at the same time.

 

Because, as limmie says, the smoking side was packed and the non smoking (smokey) side, not so packed. So, IMO, they are hoping that by enclosing the smokers, many non smokers who refused to enter, or couldn't take it long in there, will return and spend more time and money.

 

And, I think they tired of the "stinky ship" reputation they got from complaints about the smoke smell that permeated the atrium area.

 

I don't think it's only to get non smokers there. I think it's more to contain the smoke from travelling through the casino and out into that open area and down to the next level.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's what I have been saying all along. The smoking section of the Breakaway is always packed, non smoking side.....eh not so much

 

That is because non smoking sections are still smoky so people who are bothered by it stay away.

 

Now NCL's casino revenue will increase and the atria won't smell like smoke. The gaming industry is in decline because healthy people won't sit in a pit of smoke for hours. In ten years most Vegas casinos will be smoke free as smoking rates continue to decline.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally, I don't think it's about the non-smokers in the casino, but more about the non-smokers in the other venues like the Atrium or Le Bistro. Let's be honest, the smoke is so bad at times, it reaches O'Sheenan's, La Cucina and the Speigel Theater. High rollering smokers in the casino are important but so are non-smokers that are buying stuff like dining in the decks 678 too - can't alienated neither group.

 

Sent from my SM-N910T3 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So it can be done after all!!! many posters seemed to think it was not possible to have 2 casinos

 

Bravo Ncl. I'm buying another cruise credit.

 

 

It's not going to be two casinos they are just going to enclose the smoking side with possibly making it smaller. It will still be just one casino.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The fact that the investment in securing a separate enclosed area kind of proves there is financial gain to keep smokers in a casino.:)

 

I don't think it's only to get non smokers there. I think it's more to contain the smoke from travelling through the casino and out into that open area and down to the next level.

 

Yep, that's what I said. But your first statement above would make more sense if it said "proves there is financial gain to keep 'gamblers' in a casino" rather than "smokers". This change is not about the smokers. The casino was already full of them. This change is about making the non smoking gamblers happy, as well as non smokers throughout the central areas of the ship.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep, that's what I said. But your first statement above would make more sense if it said "proves there is financial gain to keep 'gamblers' in a casino" rather than "smokers". This change is not about the smokers. The casino was already full of them. This change is about making the non smoking gamblers happy, as well as non smokers throughout the central areas of the ship.

 

Yes, you worded it better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

  • Forum Jump
    • Categories
      • Welcome to Cruise Critic
      • Hurricane Zone 2024
      • Cruise Insurance Q&A w/ Steve Dasseos of Tripinsurancestore.com June 2024
      • New Cruisers
      • Cruise Lines “A – O”
      • Cruise Lines “P – Z”
      • River Cruising
      • ROLL CALLS
      • Cruise Critic News & Features
      • Digital Photography & Cruise Technology
      • Special Interest Cruising
      • Cruise Discussion Topics
      • UK Cruising
      • Australia & New Zealand Cruisers
      • Canadian Cruisers
      • North American Homeports
      • Ports of Call
      • Cruise Conversations
×
×
  • Create New...