ChucktownSteve Posted October 21, 2017 Author #26 Share Posted October 21, 2017 (edited) The original post was a snap shot in time as an article on a financial web site that had no bearing on previous or subsequent inspections. Therefore this thread should have been allowed to die as old news and not resurrected as if it were current. Especially since others had followed up with information regarding subsequent inspections. Edited October 21, 2017 by ChucktownSteve Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RJB Posted October 21, 2017 #27 Share Posted October 21, 2017 The original post was a snap shot in time as an article on a financial web site that had no bearing on previous or subsequent inspections. Therefore this thread should have been allowed to die as old news and not resurrected as if it were current. Especially since others had followed up with information regarding subsequent inspections. Agree 100%. Ships always spotless and still being cleaned. :):):) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rare PaulMCO Posted October 21, 2017 #28 Share Posted October 21, 2017 The original post was a snap shot in time as an article on a financial web site that had no bearing on previous or subsequent inspections. Therefore this thread should have been allowed to die as old news and not resurrected as if it were current. Especially since others had followed up with information regarding subsequent inspections. The thread was old new to begin with. Posted at end of June -- after the 2nd inspection where it got a 99.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now