ak1004

For us, our SS cruise in May will be probably the last one. The quality just doesn't justify the current prices. I was willing to book SS when I could get maybe for 10-15% more than O. Now it's 40-50% more, no way. Some SB sailings are very reasonably priced. Explora is still more expensive than SB, and I didn't find any itineraries that are more unique than other lines. I assume things will get better when they roll out more ships, but for now O and SB will probably be our lines of choice, and possibly Windstar. There is just a limit of how much we are willing to pay for a cruise.

SS says they are all inclusive - and yet charge for 2 out of 8 restaurants, premium internet, laundry etc. No line is truly all inclusive. What matters is are the things that important to YOU included? Personally I couldn't care less about adult beverages since we don't drink. But I do care about specialty coffee and tea. I do care about specialty restaurants etc. So I don't care that O is called premium and SS is called luxury - to me they are in the same category.

There are few things worth mentioning. First, the Essential fares are non refundable. Not only the deposit - you have to pay the whole amount at the time of booking, and it's 100% non refundable. The pricing of Essential is similar to previous pricing of P2P, just now it excludes excursions and fully non refundable. The pricing of P2P and D2D went up by 25-30%. SS prices are now around 40-50% higher compared to O when you look at Essential prices, and the inclusions are almost the same (the cost of the drink package on O is offset by the excursions credit more or less, so the only thing not included on O is gratuities). When you compare SS to SB which is in the same class, and have similar inclusions, SS is now more expensive by at least 10-15% for the Essential fare which is non refundable. But at least they are relaxing the dress code..

Completely agree. I could never understand why some people are so obsessed with what other people wear..

Well, if the dress code is the criteria, then I guess Regent, SB, Explora and Crystal are all mass market lines!

On our two previous sailings (Dawn and Spirit) jackets were enforced only in the dining venues. You could see may men on the theater without jackets on informal and even formal nights. Hopefully it will stay this way.

So this is what I read: For people who sailed on the Nova, is this enforced? I know that even with the current dress code, people would still have dinner in the Grill without a jacket, but if I want to go to one of the lounges or see an evening show, will they turn me down?

I think there is a huge disconnect between corporate actions and on board experience, and this is true for most lines. Just look at Oceania, Regent etc. We did 2 SS cruises so far, both post Covid. I cannot compare to what it was before Covid and before the acquisition, but overall we had a great time. It was not perfect, we did notice some service issues, but we would gladly sail on SS again given the right itinerary and pricing. Food was not as good as O in my opinion, but still very good overall. So I guess it's all relative - people who can compare with how it was few years ago, probably notice some cutbacks, but this is probably true for all lines. P.S. What was the “you can’t eat your caviar here” incident in the lounge?

I think you are right - just tried to do a booking online and there is no option to take air credit, only upgrade to business class.

If this is the case, then there is no point to take D2D with air credit, even if this is possible. From what I see, the price difference between D2D and P2P is always more than the cost of economy air, and since P2P now has the same cancellation policy, and also qualifies to Venetian society, what's the point to take D2D if you want to book your own flights?

Agree. But there are currently many complaints across most lines. Carnival is destroying SB, and NCL is destroying Regent and Oceania, etc. At the end of the day, we look at value for money and try to separate the management style/decisions from on board experience, otherwise we would be staying at home and stop cruising. Based on our 2 cruises with SS, they still offer excellent on board experience, but with the new pricing, it just doesn't make sense to book them. To me, they are not 50-60% better than O, so I'm not willing to pay 50-60% more.

It depends. The Nova photo opp was a disaster, there is no argument here. Introduction of a new fare that doesn't include excursions is a positive because many people prefer to book their own excursions. However, since those fares are 100% non refundable, they have to be discounted (like previous P2P pre paid) - but in reality, not only they are not discounted, they are actually similar to previous P2P pricing, but now without excursions and 100% non refundable. The devil is in details. The intention was good (maybe), the implementation terrible. But of course everything they do, the main goal is to benefit their bottom line. No different than any other business. Looks like our upcoming SS cruise in May will be our last one.

Yes, but those fares are 100% non refundable, and they used this change for massive price increase. D2D and P2P increased by 20-30%, and the new Essential fares are now similar to previous P2P fares, but without excursions and non refundable.

The cruise starts from Fusina.

Probably, but Essential fare excludes air and excursions, and looks like it's still priced higher than previous P2P. Anyway, the competition will take care of the pricing. We book based on itinerary and pricing. If SS inclusions are similar to SB with Essential fare, but prices are significantly higher, personally I won't book SS anymore unless there is another promotion.

This is a very good change, with more flexibility. However, it seems like Essential prices are now similar to what used to be P2P, but exclude excursions. So in terms of inclusions, Essential is similar to SB, but with prices at least 10-15% higher. For example, European cruises now start at $550-600 per night, with no excursions. SB has many sailings around $500 or less.

We are on the same cruise. We asked for quote and SS quoted us almost the same price per person as the price for the room, so basically almost double. With all potential changes, and significantly higher prices, why people still book hotels via cruise lines? I understand that you also get transfers, but transfers in places like Venice are peanuts compared to what you overpay compared to booking independently.

Like you, I cannot express an opinion about cruise lines I haven't sailed on such SB, Regent or EJ. All I'm saying is that my opinion is that O has the best food out of 12 lines we sailed on.. and this includes SS, Crystal and Azamara plus few mass market lines. I don't care much about their advertising slogan, in the same way I don't care much about their other advertising BS (like 2 for 1 fares, FREE excursions, FREE wines etc.) SS markets itself as all inclusive line, but charges extra for 2 out of 8 restaurants, premium internet, laundry etc. I base my opinion on my experience, not advertising slogans or other people's opinions. And yes, O's food isn't objectively the best at sea, it's the best based on my opinion, which I don't pretend to be objective. Maybe after our first cruise on SB in September this title will go to SB, and then to EJ (assuming their prices will come down to earth - and if not, there are more than enough excellent choices).

We did. Still much better than big ships, but not as good as O. But it was in 2019, so things might have changed. I might be not the best person to ask because I like very specific food, and O fits my taste the best. But my wife agrees with me (well, kind of..)

Well, we haven't sailed on SB or EJ yet, so I cannot comment. O was our first cruise line after sailing on mass market (Celebrity, Princess, HAL etc). I think food in the MDR is in a different league compared to MDR on the mass market lines (not suites). I agree that Specialty restaurants on Celebrity are pretty good, but they also cost extra. Then we sailed on Azamara, Old Crystal and SS. I still think that O is marginally better than Crystal and SS, but again, that's my opinion. I know many people who sailed with Crystal and SS and still prefer O food, so I don't think I'm completely off. Personally Red Ginger was my least favorite specialty restaurant, but it's because I like European food more than Asian. So it really comes to personal preferences. For example, I consider O rack of lamb one of the best I had in any restaurant, including some of the top rated restaurants on land.

Except for EJ?

Which cruise line would you consider having better cuisine than O?

If I sailed based on the reviews, I would stay home for the rest of my life.. The only opinion that matters is yours. Some of the reviews are so absurd and ridiculous.

After 2 cruises on SS (Dawn and Spirit), this was not our experience at all. While we liked food on Oceania better, food on SS was overall very good in all venues. I would gladly sail on both given the right itinerary and price.

Good point. We sailed on SS twice, and SS has passenger to crew ratio almost as good as EJ (around 67), and I didn't see significant different between SS and O in terms of crowds. Don't forget that O average cabin size is 25% smaller than EJ, so public areas are not necessarily larger per guest.