megavfm Posted July 17, 2016 #1 Share Posted July 17, 2016 Having returned from an Alaskan 7 day cruise onboard NA not that long ago, I thought I might offer a comparison of my experience with Cunard’s Queen Victoria from March this year. They’re fairly similar in size with CC stats of 2106 pax for NA and 1988 pax for QV. QV was only our 2nd ever cruise and NA was our 3rd. Boarding experience; similar for both – find your own way to your stateroom. The ship; I thought both appeared well maintained and the public areas were kept very clean. Both have promenade decks allowing you to circumnavigate the ship; there were small drink tables next to many of the deck-lounges on QV – on NA one rested your drink on the deck. Gyms were comparable. Food; I thought the food (Lido, MDR and casual outlets) quality and variety was far superior on NA compared to QV. NA’s ‘As you wish’ dining option was also a plus over the set dining times on QV. I had lurked on the CC HAL board prior to our Alaskan trip and was concerned about many posts lamenting the deteriorating quality of HAL meals, but as a newbie on HAL we thought it was very good to excellent (it must have been outstanding in the good old days!). One thing we thought QV did better than NA was better hand hygiene enforcement. On QV there were staff standing with hand sanitisers at the entrances of the Lido and MDR. It was difficult to walk by without having it squirted into your hands, whereas on NA there were hand sanitiser units on stands at the entrances and most people I observed just ignored using them. QV’s afternoon tea though had a far better setting in the Queen’s room than NA’s Dutch high tea in a cordoned off section of the MDR. Henry in NA’s Explorations Café was excellent. Entertainment; I can only agree with the many posts about how comparatively poor HAL’s shipboard entertainment is, with BB Kings being a saving grace. Even the limited entertainment on Paul Gauguin was better. Digital workshop onboard NA was useful. Cabin; we had balcony/verandah cabins on both ships. Had great cabin stewards on both ships. Both ships were similarly comfortable and spacious enough with NA winning the bathroom size stakes – but still not as good as our experience on Paul Gauguin. However, a big shout-out to those CC posters who recommended the HAL aft cabins. On NA we had VB 7143 and the panoramic view from the stern coupled with the fresh air of Alaska (when people weren’t smoking) was truly wonderful. We only experienced some minor vibration once when the ship was manoeuvring in dock (I can’t even remember which port it was). Overall; there’s a lot to like about the NA when compared to QV. However, our other concern from lurking on the CC HAL board was HAL’s smoking policy. Thanks to the CC board we booked fully informed about HAL’s smoking policy, but still decided to take our chances with a verandah cabin. Alas, we rolled the dice and sometimes we won (we could enjoy the verandah smoke-free), but more often we had to quickly retreat into our cabin because of smokers nearby. Ok well, it was only our 3rd ever cruise so we don’t have high status with any cruise line. Time to try another cruise line, but it brought home to us that a verandah non-smoking policy is a necessity, for us at least. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Queen of DaNile Posted July 17, 2016 #2 Share Posted July 17, 2016 Thanks for the comparison between the two ships. Did you sense a more "formal" ambiance on the Queen Vic? Totally agree that smoke free verandahs would be a huge plus for us as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tampa Girl Posted July 17, 2016 #3 Share Posted July 17, 2016 Having just sailed on the QM2 from Southampton to NYC in May, I fully concur about the food being better on HAL, at least to my taste. I thought the food on the QM2 was bland, and the Kings Court (Lido) was unappetizing. I cannot envision taking a long cruise on Cunard for that primary reason. The QM2 is a larger ship than the Vista class of the other two Queens, and it is a beautiful ship and handle the rough waters like a knife going through butter. But we are not interested in sailing any of the Cunard ships again. Unless their menus improve. But, again, food is so subjective, and that is just my opinion. The one item that was outstanding, however, were the lamb chops. Delicious! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
megavfm Posted July 17, 2016 Author #4 Share Posted July 17, 2016 Hi Queen of DaNile My perception was that the QV was elegant and formal in a classic British sense, but NA was also classy in its own art deco way. They were similar but yet dissimilar.......I think I might not be making much sense here and it's easy to slip into sterotypes and generalisations - I'll stop here! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SeaDays Posted July 17, 2016 #5 Share Posted July 17, 2016 Since these two ships are structurally similar, and of course owned by the same corporation, your observations were unique and well appreciated. Thank you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rare erewhon Posted July 18, 2016 #6 Share Posted July 18, 2016 Thank you for comparing the two ships. Did you comment about the HAL balcony smoking on your survey after the cruise? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
portofrome Posted July 18, 2016 #7 Share Posted July 18, 2016 Thanks for your comparisons. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rare Scrapnana Posted July 18, 2016 #8 Share Posted July 18, 2016 Interesting comments (not just from the OP) about the food. Having sailed on QE (food cannot be that different from QV or QM2), I did not find that much difference between HAL food and Cunard food. I do think that HAL caters more to North American foods while Cunard more to British (makes sense as to the percentage of passengers on each). HAL also usually had more choices than Cunard and list the "always available" on the menu which Cunard does not do in the Britannia Restaurant. As mentioned by the OP, the afternoon tea on Cunard beats HAL's teas hands down. Part of it might be the elegance of the two story Queens Room which HAL has now introduced on Koningsdam. With the exceptions of the evening dress code and the smoking policy, I find the two lines very much alike. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
megavfm Posted July 18, 2016 Author #9 Share Posted July 18, 2016 Hi erewhon Yes, we certainly did register our disapointment about HAL's balcony smoking policy in our post-cruise survey. Not sure if it was of any use, as I had previously scanned the smoking thread here and it seemed plenty of others had complained with little or no effect. It's a contentious topic. Anyway, we're happy to sample other cruise lines; far easier for us to change than change company policy......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bernie5 Posted July 18, 2016 #10 Share Posted July 18, 2016 Thank you for taking the time to write this comparative review. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rare erewhon Posted July 18, 2016 #11 Share Posted July 18, 2016 Hi erewhonYes, we certainly did register our disapointment about HAL's balcony smoking policy in our post-cruise survey. Not sure if it was of any use, as I had previously scanned the smoking thread here and it seemed plenty of others had complained with little or no effect. It's a contentious topic. Anyway, we're happy to sample other cruise lines; far easier for us to change than change company policy......... Thank you for your reply. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carnevale Posted July 18, 2016 #12 Share Posted July 18, 2016 Many thanks Megavfm for doing this comparison. We've enjoyed sailing on the QM2 as we love to do ballroom dancing. It's been a while since we were on Cunard so we are wondering if you happened to notice how the opportunities for ballroom compared on the two ships. Any insights into this you can offer will be greatly appreciated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vagporto Posted July 18, 2016 #13 Share Posted July 18, 2016 Thank your for your comparison. I am also a recently converter cruiser and I also found more similarities than differences between the two lines. However, in QV I always hesitated between two or more entrees, while at HAL I was happy when at least one entree sounded good on paper. And I also think that the food presentation is better at Cunard (particularly deserts). But bottomline, MDR food is very similar in quality and preparation. It was good to hear your comments on both... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir PMP Posted July 18, 2016 #14 Share Posted July 18, 2016 'but still not as good as our experience on Paul Gauguin.' Thks for the comparison, but isn't the Gauguin a lot more expensive..? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
megavfm Posted July 18, 2016 Author #15 Share Posted July 18, 2016 Hi Carnevale Unfortunately, we’re (well I'm not) not ballroom dancers so I didn’t seek out this particular activity onboard NA; other HAL experts might be able to assist with your enquiry though. Hi Sir PMP You’re quite correct, Paul Gauguin is more expensive. For our first cruise we were tossing up going on a megaship with all the bells & whistles or a smaller less frenetic ship and chose the latter. Yes, it did set a high benchmark and as you can tell our subsequent few cruises have been on ships that a relatively a bit more modest in cost. Would love to try a Regent, Silverseas or Crystal cruise sometime when our budget expands! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carnevale Posted July 18, 2016 #16 Share Posted July 18, 2016 Hi CarnevaleUnfortunately, we’re (well I'm not) not ballroom dancers so I didn’t seek out this particular activity onboard NA; other HAL experts might be able to assist with your enquiry though. Many thx for getting back to me! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now