there are certainly similarities. All the talk about height, it seems to be a red herring. There is another bridge to go under....unless they stretch that one, it matters not.
I am familiar with dolphins, did not want confuse the conversation more. Seems premature analysis at this point but experts do know more. I would wager the protection this time will be as big as possible. Knee jerk reaction but the way it works. Look at pics of the Sunshine before and after. Significant change, if memory serves.
Depends who it is. They sure better be. One of my past lives was with reinsurers (had the Sunshine contract). They best have really deep pockets and be really cash rich. Hope it ain’t Merck.
Neither do I. Hope I am all wet in my procrastination. Clearing the shipping lane is one thing. Removing all the old bridge is huge. Then start the build. That is a long road to hoe.
Agreed, there is absolutely zero change of getting a new bridge in a year. I doubt that they could clear all the pieces (not just the shipping channel) in that time (which will be the number one priority once rescue and recovery are completed).
It has been a while, but I do not remember a ton of options like 5 open docks, and there are contracts for things like that....but all options are a good thing, especially right now.
My guess is that they are totally focused on this week’s debark. The domino affect of following weeks cruises will closely follow, certainly an option.