EVALUATOR Posted December 23, 2011 Author #51 Share Posted December 23, 2011 I don't disagree about the Monarch having a really bad inspection. I'm happy to read that the manager in charge is no longer there. The only point I was trying to make is that 2 different inspectors will come up with 2 different scores. Kind of like appraisals. From some of the problems reported - Monarch would hopefully have been failed by any inspector. I agree. And as I posted earlier, I hope Monarch's goal is a 100, and not just to pass the next inspection. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
time4u2go Posted December 23, 2011 #52 Share Posted December 23, 2011 Maybe it's just me, but nothing sounded "that bad" to me. No gross outs. No mice, cockroaches, moldy food. I'm sure it was a one-off. Not that bad? Really? Refrigerators not cold enough. Food not cooked to the proper temperature. Do you think mice, cockroaches, and moldy food are the only things that can cause sickness in food? Maybe not "gross", but very unsafe, and very bad, at least to me! :eek: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rare orville99 Posted December 23, 2011 #53 Share Posted December 23, 2011 Maybe it's just me, but nothing sounded "that bad" to me. No gross outs. No mice, cockroaches, moldy food. I'm sure it was a one-off. Everything listed is considered to be a major contributor to bacterial and viral propegation that are the primary causes of food poisoning and foodbourne infections such as noro. It's not coincidental that the incidence of noro outbreaks on ships has declined steadily since these types of inspections and tightening of the rules have increased. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
critterchick Posted December 23, 2011 #54 Share Posted December 23, 2011 I agree. And as I posted earlier, I hope Monarch's goal is a 100, and not just to pass the next inspection. And remember that she hasn't had anything under 92 or 93 (I looked at the history a couple of days ago) in many years. I think this report is an anomaly, but it's gone viral and all of those good scores are now forgotten. I'd sail on her tomorrow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brfan Posted December 23, 2011 #55 Share Posted December 23, 2011 I agree. And as I posted earlier, I hope Monarch's goal is a 100, and not just to pass the next inspection. While that is nice a 100 is not possible to obtain, since they automatically take off one point for older ships. So the highest mark the Monarch can get is 99. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
poncho1973 Posted December 23, 2011 #56 Share Posted December 23, 2011 Maybe it's just me, but nothing sounded "that bad" to me. No gross outs. No mice, cockroaches, moldy food. I'm sure it was a one-off. Remind me to never eat at your house. You don't find food at unsafe temps "that bad"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
time4u2go Posted December 23, 2011 #57 Share Posted December 23, 2011 Maybe it's just me, but nothing sounded "that bad" to me. No gross outs. No mice, cockroaches, moldy food. I'm sure it was a one-off. Apparently it's just you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canadian Tyler Posted December 26, 2011 #58 Share Posted December 26, 2011 Haha. Christmas dinner at my place? I'm just saying, compared to land restaurants which I imagine to be a lot worse, but maybe I'm wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mommabean Posted December 26, 2011 #59 Share Posted December 26, 2011 Gina, we sailed on another RCI's ship last week and the subject of that particular inspection did come up in a conversation with someone in charge of the 'food department' ( not going give you any details about that person's position or job discription ), I was informed that the person responsible for the failed inspection on Monarch was fired the next day. RCCL considers anything below 93 as a failure. I know they do have a new F&B on MN now. Gina Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PH8 Posted December 26, 2011 #60 Share Posted December 26, 2011 I know they do have a new F&B on MN now. Gina Seems everytime I go on there,there is a new F&B Mgr..:p Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scotty G Posted December 26, 2011 #61 Share Posted December 26, 2011 Seems everytime I go on there,there is a new F&B Mgr..:p Chet was the last regular F&B. He and Havva moved to Indy this year. When Chet went on vacation, Seamus would move up and take his place. Don't know who is who now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cello56 Posted January 5, 2012 #62 Share Posted January 5, 2012 Does anyone know what actions were taken regarding this poor performance? How long until the CDC re-inspects the Monarch? I am taking my elderly Mother-In-Law on this ship at the end of the month, and would like to know that everything has been brought up to appropriate standards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TBone2K Posted January 10, 2012 #63 Share Posted January 10, 2012 Does anyone know what actions were taken regarding this poor performance? How long until the CDC re-inspects the Monarch? As we were disembarking, the inspectors were coming on and doing their thing. Long story short, she passed: http://www.cruisecritic.com/news/news.cfm?ID=4703 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EVALUATOR Posted January 23, 2012 Author #64 Share Posted January 23, 2012 The new inspection report is available on line. No fruit flies.:) The corrective action report has not been submitted yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.