Vampire Parrot Posted February 20, 2013 #1 Share Posted February 20, 2013 Some news regarding the Star Princess apparently ignoring a boat adrift at sea: Recently released video footage of the rescue at sea of the Fifty Cent has confirmed that it was not the same boat that was photographed by passengers on the Star Princess. Alan Buckelew (Princess Cruises CEO) said “while this remains a tragic story, we are gratified to have scientific confirmation that the Star Princess was never in the vicinity of the adrift boat and that the boat photographed by our passengers was not the adrift Fifty Cent." “Nevertheless, ” he added, “we have used this as a valuable learning opportunity and have strengthened our bridge reporting procedures to ensure that all messages of concern from passengers or crew are carefully evaluated by our senior bridge officers.” Princess Cruises, referring to the photographs taken by the passengers says that “their photos depict a small white boat similar to Panga boats used by local fishermen in Central America. In contrast, the video footage of the Fifty Cent’s rescue shows a markedly different boat.” Source: Issue 220 of "The Sea" VP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TorontoTL Posted February 20, 2013 #2 Share Posted February 20, 2013 That is good news, but it doesn't surprise me that Princess didn't ignore a distressed ship. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sunsetbeachgal Posted February 20, 2013 #3 Share Posted February 20, 2013 I can only imagine what the Captain of the Star Princess has gone through during this whole unfortunate ordeal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JWJs Posted February 20, 2013 #4 Share Posted February 20, 2013 That is good news, but it doesn't surprise me that Princess didn't ignore a distressed ship. I agree. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pam in CA Posted February 20, 2013 #5 Share Posted February 20, 2013 As I was on that cruise, I'm not surprised. Amazing the damage that a few well-meaning but ignorant people (and the media) can do. This will always be remembered as the cruise that ignored a distress call and the Captain will always carry the stigma in the media even though none of the claims were true. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trikeman Posted February 20, 2013 #6 Share Posted February 20, 2013 As I was on that cruise, I'm not surprised. Amazing the damage that a few well-meaning but ignorant people (and the media) can do. This will always be remembered as the cruise that ignored a distress call and the Captain will always carry the stigma in the media even though none of the claims were true. Where are all the talking heads now with this piece of information that clears the Captain and the ship of any wrong doing.:mad: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billco Posted February 20, 2013 #7 Share Posted February 20, 2013 Why is this news when Princess released this information last August? http://www.princess.com/news/press_releases/2012/08/New-Evidence-Proves-Princess-Cruises-Did-Not-Fail-to-Rescue-Adrift-Fishermen-as-Alleged.html#.USTsqFp1T84 Have the lawsuits been dropped? Have the results of investigations by Panamanian and Bermuda authorities been released? It seems like the issue just disappeared when Princess released their press release. Not everyone accepted the Princess version. http://www.cruiselawnews.com/tags/star-princess/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cherylandtk Posted February 20, 2013 #8 Share Posted February 20, 2013 I don't think this is actually anything new. The quote from Mr. Buckelew is identical to the one in the Princess 8/30/12 press release which also discussed the differences in some recent (at that time) video footage. http://www.princess.com/news/press_releases/2012/08/New-Evidence-Proves-Princess-Cruises-Did-Not-Fail-to-Rescue-Adrift-Fishermen-as-Alleged.html#.USTrD2t5mSM I think "The Sea" is just a bit behind on reporting their news. Eta- I see billco and I were thinking the same thing at the same time ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pam in CA Posted February 20, 2013 #9 Share Posted February 20, 2013 Where are all the talking heads now with this piece of information that clears the Captain and the ship of any wrong doing.:mad:Off spreading other misinformation. It's not sexy nor does it gain viewership to make a retraction or publish a correction follow-up. Hope the birders are happy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cruiserkenn Posted February 20, 2013 #10 Share Posted February 20, 2013 Some news regarding the Star Princess apparently ignoring a boat adrift at sea: Recently released video footage of the rescue at sea of the Fifty Cent has confirmed that it was not the same boat that was photographed by passengers on the Star Princess. Alan Buckelew (Princess Cruises CEO) said “while this remains a tragic story, we are gratified to have scientific confirmation that the Star Princess was never in the vicinity of the adrift boat and that the boat photographed by our passengers was not the adrift Fifty Cent." “Nevertheless, ” he added, “we have used this as a valuable learning opportunity and have strengthened our bridge reporting procedures to ensure that all messages of concern from passengers or crew are carefully evaluated by our senior bridge officers.” Princess Cruises, referring to the photographs taken by the passengers says that “their photos depict a small white boat similar to Panga boats used by local fishermen in Central America. In contrast, the video footage of the Fifty Cent’s rescue shows a markedly different boat.” Source: Issue 220 of "The Sea VP Thanks for posting this. I may have missed all of the details, before. Thanks again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WVBill Posted February 20, 2013 #11 Share Posted February 20, 2013 Off spreading other misinformation. It's not sexy nor does it gain viewership to make a retraction or publish a correction follow-up. Hope the birders are happy. ... and we can be certain that if the Star Princess is EVER in the news again, they will find a way to include: "The ship was alleged to have ignored distress calls from a......". WITHOUT "...which was later proved unfounded"... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.