Jump to content

Mask Policy


need2vaca
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, MsTabbyKats said:

IMHO, anyone so nervous about becoming infected shouldn't be sailing yet.

I'll add to this that if you're so nervous about becoming infected, on a fully vaccinated cruise, because someone isn't wearing a mask, maybe you don't need to be cruising

  • Like 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

NCL will continue to require masks until they figure out it's costing them money.  We cancelled almost $18k in bookings the week following their new masking requirement.  We will not cruise on any ship that requires a mask.

 

Perhaps the cruise lines could adopt this policy:  cruises leaving from a port require masks on the first and third week of the month, cruises leaving on the other weeks don't.  Wonder which would be more popular.

  • Like 4
  • Haha 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, RocketMan275 said:

 

 

Perhaps the cruise lines could adopt this policy:  cruises leaving from a port require masks on the first and third week of the month, cruises leaving on the other weeks don't.  Wonder which would be more popular.

Great idea!

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RocketMan275 said:

Perhaps the cruise lines could adopt this policy:  cruises leaving from a port require masks on the first and third week of the month, cruises leaving on the other weeks don't.  Wonder which would be more popular.

 

I actually think there is a chance we end up with some hybrid model to accommodate the niche markets emerging. Those that want the most strict standards and those that don't ;-).

 

Instead of one week on/one week off, I believe it maybe ship specific. Those of us who have been cruising awhile remember this happened when ships initially went to no smoking. There were smoking ships and non smoking ships while the lines figured out what the market wanted.

 

Regardless, the biggest question remains.... what will save the industry? 

 

Edited by BermudaBound2014
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RocketMan275 said:

NCL will continue to require masks until they figure out it's costing them money.  We cancelled almost $18k in bookings the week following their new masking requirement.  We will not cruise on any ship that requires a mask.

 

Perhaps the cruise lines could adopt this policy:  cruises leaving from a port require masks on the first and third week of the month, cruises leaving on the other weeks don't.  Wonder which would be more popular.

Masking helps mitigate the risk of COVID spread on the ships. No one likes masking, but 10's of thousands of passengers cruise weekly across different cruise lines. There is zero possibility that any cruise line would adopt a "sometimes mask" / "sometimes no mask" policy. Mitigating risk is a big marketing sales item.... saying that they are going to offer "more risky cruises" is not a big seller. 

 

 

  • Like 3
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, BirdTravels said:

Masking helps mitigate the risk of COVID spread on the ships. No one likes masking, but 10's of thousands of passengers cruise weekly across different cruise lines. There is zero possibility that any cruise line would adopt a "sometimes mask" / "sometimes no mask" policy. Mitigating risk is a big marketing sales item.... saying that they are going to offer "more risky cruises" is not a big seller. 

 

 

There are costs associated with masking.  The question is this:  do the benefits outweigh the costs?  I happen to think they don't.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, BermudaBound2014 said:

Instead of one week on/one week off, I believe it maybe ship specific. Those of us who have been cruising awhile remember this happened when ships initially went to no smoking. There were smoking ships and non smoking ships while the lines figured out what the market wanted.

I thought of that but discarded that idea because there are some ports that only have one ship servicing that port.  For example NOLA, has only Breakaway.  If the policy were ship specific, those wishing to cruise from that port would have no choice.  Alternating between weeks provides more choice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, RocketMan275 said:

There are costs associated with masking.  The question is this:  do the benefits outweigh the costs?  I happen to think they don't.

To even the opinion count.

I think they do. Masks required, wear one.

However, like you said we all have choices. Cruise or don't cruise.

  • Like 3
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, BirdTravels said:

Masking helps mitigate the risk of COVID spread on the ships. No one likes masking, but 10's of thousands of passengers cruise weekly across different cruise lines. There is zero possibility that any cruise line would adopt a "sometimes mask" / "sometimes no mask" policy. Mitigating risk is a big marketing sales item.... saying that they are going to offer "more risky cruises" is not a big seller. 

A cruise line that didn't require masking would have a bigger marketing sales item, ie, a cruise you can enjoy.  

  • Like 4
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

  • Forum Jump
    • Categories
      • Welcome to Cruise Critic
      • ANNOUNCEMENT: Set Sail on Sun Princess®
      • Hurricane Zone 2024
      • Cruise Insurance Q&A w/ Steve Dasseos of Tripinsurancestore.com June 2024
      • New Cruisers
      • Cruise Lines “A – O”
      • Cruise Lines “P – Z”
      • River Cruising
      • ROLL CALLS
      • Cruise Critic News & Features
      • Digital Photography & Cruise Technology
      • Special Interest Cruising
      • Cruise Discussion Topics
      • UK Cruising
      • Australia & New Zealand Cruisers
      • Canadian Cruisers
      • North American Homeports
      • Ports of Call
      • Cruise Conversations
×
×
  • Create New...