B35 Posted February 14, 2017 #851 Share Posted February 14, 2017 btw.. I can't believe some people are saying it's a band aid repair. Absolute nonsense..CAN'T BELIEVE anyone would say that about NCL .......they use Elastoplast in Oz 😈😜 Sent from my SM-G935F using Forums mobile app An Elastoplast for repair and a Tim Tam for energy! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VK3DQ Posted February 14, 2017 #852 Share Posted February 14, 2017 An Elastoplast for repair and a Tim Tam for energy! And dont forget a good lie down and a bex will fix most things :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chrisb74 Posted February 14, 2017 #853 Share Posted February 14, 2017 There will be a formal investigation - it will be interesting to read. Unfortunately these things take months. http://www.atsb.gov.au/publications/investigation_reports/2017/mair/329-mo-2017-003/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chengkp75 Posted February 14, 2017 #854 Share Posted February 14, 2017 There will be a formal investigation - it will be interesting to read. Unfortunately these things take months. http://www.atsb.gov.au/publications/investigation_reports/2017/mair/329-mo-2017-003/ Looking forward to it, I've got a file of cruise ship incident reports, interesting to note that no mention was made in the summary of previous propulsion problems, or the fact that the ship sailed with only one azipod. While this will definitely be discussed in the report, if it was an overriding concern, it would have been listed in the summary of events. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rare richstowe Posted February 14, 2017 #855 Share Posted February 14, 2017 I don't regard it as impossible for both NCL and John to be wrong. Do you?I do but John has no history of lying to me . Plus I'd rather insult a cruiseline then another CCer .;) Love the symmetry of that wake! [emoji106] Sent from my iPhone using Forums Your right . I hadn't even thought to notice that although if it wasn't symmetrical it would be noticed . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chengkp75 Posted February 14, 2017 #856 Share Posted February 14, 2017 Star dropped the pilot about a half hour ago, and is now doing 19 knots. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaja Posted February 14, 2017 #857 Share Posted February 14, 2017 Star dropped the pilot about a half hour ago, and is now doing 19 knots. Good news...! And I wish to thank you for always sharing your expertise with us....I do really appreciate your posts on all the threads..;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rare insidecabin Posted February 14, 2017 #858 Share Posted February 14, 2017 Lets hope that will this other stuff going on they remembered to put enough gas in the tanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B35 Posted February 14, 2017 #859 Share Posted February 14, 2017 A question for the tech guys. When using two azipods, does it stress them less than using 1? Would they have ran 1 at full throttle but 2 on half throttle each? I'm wondering if running on 1 caused too much stress on it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chengkp75 Posted February 14, 2017 #860 Share Posted February 14, 2017 A question for the tech guys. When using two azipods, does it stress them less than using 1? Would they have ran 1 at full throttle but 2 on half throttle each? I'm wondering if running on 1 caused too much stress on it? If the itinerary needed only half power to make the speed, then yes, they would run two pods at half power. A shut down pod causes drag, requiring more power to get the same speed. The units are designed to run at 100% rated power (there is always a safety factor designed in) indefinitely. So, no, running one azipod at full power would not over stress it. Most itineraries are planned for less than full speed/power, just to save fuel, but a month or two running at full power should not have any deleterious effects. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ew101 Posted February 14, 2017 #861 Share Posted February 14, 2017 This is the latest media statement: The technical issues relating to Norwegian Star’s azipod propulsion system have been repaired and the ship was cleared for sailing by the classification society and the local authorities. Norwegian Star departed from Melbourne on February 14 at 2:00 p.m. local time and will proceed directly to Auckland, after completing a short sea trial period. The ship is expected to arrive in Auckland on the morning of February 18. Guests embarking on Norwegian Star’s February 18 cruise will be contacted in the next 48 hours to confirm the ship’s embarkation time on February 18. Norwegian Cruise Line would like to extend our sincerest appreciation to our guests for their patience and understanding during this cruise and to the ship’s crew for ensuring that all guests were able to make the most of their amended journey. #### Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JVilleGal Posted February 14, 2017 #862 Share Posted February 14, 2017 Did they really sail at 2pm?? I didn't think that was the case at all. Curious nothing else as I have followed this from the beginning Sent from my iPhone using Forums Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
casofilia Posted February 14, 2017 #863 Share Posted February 14, 2017 (edited) Did they really sail at 2pm?? I didn't think that was the case at all. Curious nothing else as I have followed this from the beginning Withdrawn Edited February 14, 2017 by casofilia error Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chengkp75 Posted February 14, 2017 #864 Share Posted February 14, 2017 Did they really sail at 2pm?? I didn't think that was the case at all. Curious nothing else as I have followed this from the beginning Sent from my iPhone using Forums I think it was around 5pm local time after the trials. Star is currently off Wilson's Point (southern point of Australia) doing 20 knots, and ETA 0500 2/18 local. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JVilleGal Posted February 14, 2017 #865 Share Posted February 14, 2017 Well good news is that she "seems" to be repaired at last and on her way to Auckland. I feel bad for passengers from the US and other long distances. I know our air tickets are costing far more than the cruise itself. We are really reconsidering our booking. TI would not make anyone whole given this incident as missed Ports and cruiseline mechanical failures aren't covered unless the cruise is cancelled. Safe journey all and thanks for sharing. Sent from my iPhone using Forums Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rare MicCanberra Posted February 14, 2017 #866 Share Posted February 14, 2017 I think it was around 5pm local time after the trials. Star is currently off Wilson's Point (southern point of Australia) doing 20 knots, and ETA 0500 2/18 local. They were still in the bay at 10pm last night, and dropped the pilot at around midnight.:D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VK3DQ Posted February 14, 2017 #867 Share Posted February 14, 2017 Looking forward to it, I've got a file of cruise ship incident reports, interesting to note that no mention was made in the summary of previous propulsion problems, or the fact that the ship sailed with only one azipod. While this will definitely be discussed in the report, if it was an overriding concern, it would have been listed in the summary of events. I too am looking forward to reading the report , however I would prefer not to try to preempt it .... Regards John Fisher LtCmdr RN Retired Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rdnpdx1 Posted February 14, 2017 #868 Share Posted February 14, 2017 They were still in the bay at 10pm last night, and dropped the pilot at around midnight.:D At 0720 local time we are cruising at 20.6 knots on a heading of 65 degrees, well on our way this time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
triptolemus Posted February 14, 2017 #869 Share Posted February 14, 2017 I would prefer not to try to preempt it .... Regards John Fisher LtCmdr RN Retired Which is interesting considering that's exactly what you've been doing in this thread. Your signature keeps getting longer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VK3DQ Posted February 14, 2017 #870 Share Posted February 14, 2017 Which is interesting considering that's exactly what you've been doing in this thread. Rubbish Your signature keeps getting longer. if you have it Flaunt it ;-) Oh BTW do I detect a "split personality" somewhere here ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rare MicCanberra Posted February 14, 2017 #871 Share Posted February 14, 2017 If only they had done this back in December when the issues first arose. Hindsight is a wonderful thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VK3DQ Posted February 14, 2017 #872 Share Posted February 14, 2017 If only they had done this back in December when the issues first arose. Hindsight is a wonderful thing. of Course But taking chances at Sea is asking to die the Sea is not a benign place Always check and double check , before you leave the fairway marker astern if fact do it before you think of casting your warps off the wharf accidents normally have an interesting history of events before they happen ask E J Smith :-) regards John Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JVilleGal Posted February 14, 2017 #873 Share Posted February 14, 2017 Safe Journey All! Sent from my iPhone using Forums Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chengkp75 Posted February 14, 2017 #874 Share Posted February 14, 2017 If only they had done this back in December when the issues first arose. Hindsight is a wonderful thing. The problem is, most likely the parts that were repaired in Melbourne had not failed, nor had given any indication of failure in December. And the part needed in December was not a stock item, and had to be manufactured. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
triptolemus Posted February 14, 2017 #875 Share Posted February 14, 2017 The problem is, most likely the parts that were repaired in Melbourne had not failed, nor had given any indication of failure in December. And the part needed in December was not a stock item, and had to be manufactured. Please... can we have more posts asserting that Corporate Overlord NCL is trying to kill everyone in the name of profit with Gilligan at the helm of the Norwegian Minnow... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now