Jump to content

jimbo5544

Members
  • Posts

    41,060
  • Joined

Everything posted by jimbo5544

  1. Why would they do that? The facts over time and history is a great example is that they do NOT sell well (at least in comparison to Carnivals other markets). Add to that, the limited itineraries and we get the answer, at least the answer Carnival believes.
  2. Dead presidents rule in this case. Best market gets the new iron, because it sells better.
  3. Do not disagree, I would need to see the numbers for bookings. If she sails at 70% that logic goes out the window.
  4. Princess says they “own” Alaska and HAL goes places on the “land” package side that no-one else goes.
  5. They like it becaus eit their STRONGEST market. I feel the same as you but 8 million people (and 3 of the 7 largest cities in the US) dictates other wise.
  6. Carnival already has two brands that are firmly entrenched in Alaska, Princess and HAL.
  7. They may not think cheapest is best….your opinion may vary
  8. Sounds like a plan. While I am not a fan of duck, Emeril's version was a home run.
  9. I would be interested in your thoughts on the new menus when you try them. I loved them.
  10. Here is the link https://boards.cruisecritic.com/topic/2986050-live-experienced-cruisers-try-celebrity-14-day-cruise-to-antartica-on-the-eclipse/
  11. Been on 62 cruises and 5 lines. I would think your analogy is spot on.
  12. Never bought into the “open space” scenario. I see no problem at all in Carnival announcing a phase 2 for a new cruise port. Matter of fact, it seems like a good idea.
×
×
  • Create New...

If you are already a Cruise Critic member, please log in with your existing account information or your email address and password.