Rare MicCanberra Posted September 17, 2013 #26 Share Posted September 17, 2013 Looking at this diagram - it is just as well that somebody had the presence of mind to take the ship into shallow waters - otherwise there may have been a much greater loss of life Barry Interesting, I suppose you are right but we will never know. What I don't get is why the Captian decided to leave the ship before it was evacuated.:D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aus Traveller Posted September 17, 2013 #27 Share Posted September 17, 2013 Interesting, I suppose you are right but we will never know. What I don't get is why the Captian decided to leave the ship before it was evacuated.:D Didn't you know? He didn't decide to leave ..... he "fell" into a lifeboat. :D:D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
karmac Posted September 17, 2013 #28 Share Posted September 17, 2013 What an amazing operation it was. It was a very late night for me:eek:. I must say though, I was surprised at how much damage there was to the starboard side. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rare MicCanberra Posted September 17, 2013 #29 Share Posted September 17, 2013 Didn't you know? He didn't decide to leave ..... he "fell" into a lifeboat. :D:D Thats right, and then his crew wouldn't listen and take him back to the ship.:D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aus Traveller Posted September 17, 2013 #30 Share Posted September 17, 2013 What an amazing operation it was. It was a very late night for me:eek:. I must say though, I was surprised at how much damage there was to the starboard side. A lot of the damage could have happened when she settled onto the rocks on her side. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Big_M Posted September 17, 2013 #31 Share Posted September 17, 2013 A lot of the damage could have happened when she settled onto the rocks on her side. Yes, that's what I'd expect. Plus she's been there for 20 months, so with a lot of weight on parts that aren't designed to take that for an extended period of time, and the regular wave motion to keep pushing things down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rare MicCanberra Posted September 17, 2013 #32 Share Posted September 17, 2013 Yes, that's what I'd expect. Plus she's been there for 20 months, so with a lot of weight on parts that aren't designed to take that for an extended period of time, and the regular wave motion to keep pushing things down. Mother nature wouldn't be gentle either, they would have had some big storms, I am sure.:D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rare TLCOhio Posted September 17, 2013 #33 Share Posted September 17, 2013 From CNN within the last hour this morning, they have this headline: "Costa Concordia righted after massive salvage effort" with lots of good and interesting visuals. Much video coverage this am on several TV networks. Here are the story highlights: "Engineers succeeded Tuesday in righting the Costa Concordia cruise liner off the Italian island of Giglio, where it had capsized when it ran aground in January 2012, killing dozens of people. 'She is standing upright better than anyone thought she would be,' said Nick Sloane, the senior salvage master, about the vessel three football fields in length. In an unprecedented and painstaking process that involved massive pulleys, cables and steel tanks, the 500-person salvage crew from 26 countries rolled the 114,000-ton vessel off the rocks on which it had rested since it ran aground. By midnight, despite delays caused by thunderstorms and the need to tighten a slack cable, the ship had been hauled off the rocks and upward about 25 degrees. That was far enough for the salvage crew to start drawing water into massive steel boxes attached to the exposed side of the hull and then use the weight of that water to finish rolling the hulk onto a steel platform built off the sea floor. There appeared to be no sign of leaks, Gabrielli told reporters -- a promising sign, as the wrecked liner is full of spoiled food and chemicals in material such as paint and lubricants. Authorities will temporarily take back possession of the site to look for the bodies of two crew members still missing, Sloane said. A robotic submarine equipped with surveillance cameras will survey the damaged side of the ship and create models needed in planning for the next phase of operations -- the attachment of more buoyancy chambers called sponsons to the starboard side. Organizers expect the ship won't be towed away for dismantling until the summer of 2014. Tuesday's predawn accomplishment was met with applause from the people of Giglio, a tiny island that was transformed by the disaster." Full story at: http://www.cnn.com/2013/09/15/world/europe/italy-costa-concordia-salvage/index.html THANKS! Enjoy! Terry in Ohio Did a June 7-19, 2011, Celebrity Solstice cruise from Barcelona that had stops in Villefranche, ports near Pisa and Rome, Naples, Kotor, Venice and Dubrovnik. Enjoyed great weather and a wonderful trip. Dozens of wonderful visuals with key highlights, tips, comments, etc., on these postings. We are now at 142,064 views for this live/blog re-cap on our first sailing with Celebrity and much on wonderful Barcelona. Check these postings and added info at: http://www.boards.cruisecritic.com/showthread.php?t=1426474 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
voyager70 Posted September 17, 2013 #34 Share Posted September 17, 2013 Looking at this diagram - it is just as well that somebody had the presence of mind to take the ship into shallow waters - otherwise there may have been a much greater loss of life Barry Actually, after the collision and the ship became disabled, she drifted out into much deeper waters only to have a change of wind direction blow her back into shallow waters near shore. Had this not occurred, it might well have been a modern day Titanic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Australian family Posted September 17, 2013 #35 Share Posted September 17, 2013 Heard this morning that they intend going through every cabin and trying to recover passengers items out of mini safe etc. Hopefully they will be able to return some possessions. Will be horrific though finding the 2 bodies, if they find them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rare MicCanberra Posted September 17, 2013 #36 Share Posted September 17, 2013 Heard this morning that they intend going through every cabin and trying to recover passengers items out of mini safe etc. Hopefully they will be able to return some possessions. Will be horrific though finding the 2 bodies, if they find them. Yes, it will be a sad time for many families. I hope they find the bodies.:( Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Big_M Posted September 18, 2013 #37 Share Posted September 18, 2013 Actually, after the collision and the ship became disabled, she drifted out into much deeper waters only to have a change of wind direction blow her back into shallow waters near shore. Had this not occurred, it might well have been a modern day Titanic. Thanks for the confirmation. I thought that was the case, but couldn't remember the detail. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Australian family Posted September 18, 2013 #38 Share Posted September 18, 2013 Just heard they have recovered two bodies. At least the families will be able to have closure now. Very sad and traumatic for the families. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rare MicCanberra Posted September 18, 2013 #39 Share Posted September 18, 2013 Just heard they have recovered two bodies. At least the families will be able to have closure now. Very sad and traumatic for the families. I agree, I am so glad that they can no have a proper burial for them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.