KPfromCT Posted April 11, 2016 #1 Share Posted April 11, 2016 of the Anthem and that huge storm? Was he cleared of any wrongdoing? Is he back on the ship, or A ship? Never heard anything after that whole fiasco. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cruisinfanatic Posted April 11, 2016 #2 Share Posted April 11, 2016 of the Anthem and that huge storm?Was he cleared of any wrongdoing? Is he back on the ship, or A ship? Never heard anything after that whole fiasco. As far as I know, he never left the ship Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KPfromCT Posted April 11, 2016 Author #3 Share Posted April 11, 2016 As far as I know, he never left the ship Hmmmmmmmmm. I thought the last I had read on that HUGE thread was that he was down in Miami for questioning. I could be wrong. Glad to hear that if that's the case. Thanks!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ONECRUISER Posted April 11, 2016 #4 Share Posted April 11, 2016 Hmmmmmmmmm.I thought the last I had read on that HUGE thread was that he was down in Miami for questioning. I could be wrong. Glad to hear that if that's the case. Thanks!!! Not sure where article is but included: USCG cleared him of any wrongdoing, in fact, commended him for a job well done in the storm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KPfromCT Posted April 11, 2016 Author #5 Share Posted April 11, 2016 Not sure where article is but included: USCG cleared him of any wrongdoing, in fact, commended him for a job well done in the storm Great to hear! Thank you for the update! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FloGaleRNTX Posted April 11, 2016 #6 Share Posted April 11, 2016 Heinrick Sorensen was the captain on the March 27th Anthem sailing. Not sure if he was on during the storm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ryano Posted April 11, 2016 #7 Share Posted April 11, 2016 (edited) Heinrick Sorensen was the captain on the March 27th Anthem sailing. Not sure if he was on during the storm. Captain Claus Andersen was the Captain during the storm. According to what crusenfever post a couple weeks ago, Capt Claus "is on vacation". Even though a Rep from Bayleys office reassured us Capt Claus would be returning, I have a feeling vacation in this case means the same thing Forrest Gump's mom thought it did. "Where you go somewhere and you dont ever come back" Edited April 11, 2016 by ryano Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chengkp75 Posted April 11, 2016 #8 Share Posted April 11, 2016 Hmmmmmmmmm.I thought the last I had read on that HUGE thread was that he was down in Miami for questioning. I could be wrong. Glad to hear that if that's the case. Thanks!!! As per company policy, he was taken off the ship to aid in the investigation as to whether the company's policies needed revision, not really "for questioning". He was part of the decision to expand the shore staff storm monitoring system. As stated, the USCG has commended him for his actions during the storm, and had no jurisdiction to question the decision to sail. That belongs to the Bahamas Maritime Authority, which has asked for assistance from the USCG, but their report on whether either RCI's passage planning procedures needed revision, or whether the IMO's ISM best practices requirements need revision has not been submitted yet. The BMA has not brought any investigation into the Captain's actions, either in the decision to sail, or in his actions during the storm. Last I heard he had returned to the ship a couple to three weeks after the storm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Merion_Mom Posted April 11, 2016 #9 Share Posted April 11, 2016 As per company policy, he was taken off the ship to aid in the investigation as to whether the company's policies needed revision, not really "for questioning". He was part of the decision to expand the shore staff storm monitoring system. As stated, the USCG has commended him for his actions during the storm, and had no jurisdiction to question the decision to sail. That belongs to the Bahamas Maritime Authority, which has asked for assistance from the USCG, but their report on whether either RCI's passage planning procedures needed revision, or whether the IMO's ISM best practices requirements need revision has not been submitted yet. The BMA has not brought any investigation into the Captain's actions, either in the decision to sail, or in his actions during the storm. Last I heard he had returned to the ship a couple to three weeks after the storm. He did not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cruisinfanatic Posted April 12, 2016 #10 Share Posted April 12, 2016 Hmmmmmmmmm.I thought the last I had read on that HUGE thread was that he was down in Miami for questioning. I could be wrong. Glad to hear that if that's the case. Thanks!!! He did go to Miami. Then flew right back and was on next sailing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ryano Posted April 12, 2016 #11 Share Posted April 12, 2016 Then flew right back and was on next sailing That is not correct. Not only is he NOT on Anthem, he is not even listed to relieve the Captain that is currently on there. Im guessing that Captain Claus will quietly "disappear" just as Captain Tengelsen did after the Brilliance accident. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chengkp75 Posted April 12, 2016 #12 Share Posted April 12, 2016 That is not correct. Not only is he NOT on Anthem, he is not even listed to relieve the Captain that is currently on there. Im guessing that Captain Claus will quietly "disappear" just as Captain Tengelsen did after the Brilliance accident. I would really hate to see this Captain thrown on the altar of PR. Given that NO regulatory agency has even once questioned the decision to sail, that even RCI has never said that he did wrong, but that THEIR procedures, which he followed, were in need of revision (which has still not been called for by any regulatory agency, it is the company's voluntary action), to throw this 17 year career with RCI down the drain is a shame. While there is spin to everything, I recall seeing that the Brilliance's Captain was older and closer to retirement, and that he publicly stated that he felt bad for the experience the passengers had, and decided he didn't want to possibly have to do that again, so retired. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ryano Posted April 12, 2016 #13 Share Posted April 12, 2016 (edited) I would really hate to see this Captain thrown on the altar of PR. Given that NO regulatory agency has even once questioned the decision to sail, that even RCI has never said that he did wrong, but that THEIR procedures, which he followed, were in need of revision (which has still not been called for by any regulatory agency, it is the company's voluntary action), to throw this 17 year career with RCI down the drain is a shame. While there is spin to everything, I recall seeing that the Brilliance's Captain was older and closer to retirement, and that he publicly stated that he felt bad for the experience the passengers had, and decided he didn't want to possibly have to do that again, so retired. I would hate to see it too. Captain Claus is my favorite Captain so far. His Q&A session on Radiance was the most infomative Ive been to and I felt that guests safety is VERY important to him. Ive never, for even a second, believed that was his solely his fault. I think he did a wonderful job keeping his guests safe and damage to a minimum on that voyage. Bayleys office has reassured many of us that Captain Claus would be back. Maybe they are just letting things settle down longer. I guess we will wait and see. Thanks for the information about Captain Erik. Ive heard so many stories. Edited April 12, 2016 by ryano Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rubrrick Posted April 12, 2016 #14 Share Posted April 12, 2016 I would really hate to see this Captain thrown on the altar of PR. Given that NO regulatory agency has even once questioned the decision to sail, that even RCI has never said that he did wrong, but that THEIR procedures, which he followed, were in need of revision (which has still not been called for by any regulatory agency, it is the company's voluntary action), to throw this 17 year career with RCI down the drain is a shame. While there is spin to everything, I recall seeing that the Brilliance's Captain was older and closer to retirement, and that he publicly stated that he felt bad for the experience the passengers had, and decided he didn't want to possibly have to do that again, so retired. I truly believe that if Mr. Bayley's office said that he is still around, he is. It was my understanding that he was temporarily re assigned to the Ovation team. Having sailed with Claus for many years, it would be a shame if they just quietly swept him under the bus. Only time will tell. Rick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chengkp75 Posted April 12, 2016 #15 Share Posted April 12, 2016 Very likely that he would not be back to Anthem, just for PR reasons, but a transfer to another Quantum or an Oasis class ship would be understandable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul65 Posted April 12, 2016 #16 Share Posted April 12, 2016 Very likely that he would not be back to Anthem, just for PR reasons, but a transfer to another Quantum or an Oasis class ship would be understandable. The incident was only two months ago, so I wouldn't be surprised if he's still involved with an investigation team reviewing procedures and policies, etc. Nothing from the company, during the time it was making news, seemed to indicate that they were pointing fingers at the Captain. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chengkp75 Posted April 12, 2016 #17 Share Posted April 12, 2016 The incident was only two months ago, so I wouldn't be surprised if he's still involved with an investigation team reviewing procedures and policies, etc. Nothing from the company, during the time it was making news, seemed to indicate that they were pointing fingers at the Captain. Knowing how these ISM "management of change" procedures work, the announced "weather center" and its role, responsibility, and procedures were already determined when it was announced. I believe they have moved on to the next area, since the ISM compliance department of any shipping line is constantly working on items large and small that require attention or addition to the ISM. As I said, no, nothing indicated that he didn't follow established procedures, nor have the Bahamas Maritime Authority (the regulatory agency that would determine his wrong-doing), nor the country of his license (if different from the Bahamas), so any firing or demotion would simply be a PR exercise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ryano Posted April 12, 2016 #18 Share Posted April 12, 2016 Very likely that he would not be back to Anthem, just for PR reasons, but a transfer to another Quantum or an Oasis class ship would be understandable. I realize this was a canned response sent to many of us who wrote in support of Captain Claus and Brittany likely doesnt know much more than we do but here is what was said as far as Captain Claus returning. I got this back on February 18. Dear Mr. L........... Thank you for contacting the Executive Office of Royal Caribbean International. It is my pleasure to respond on behalf of Mr. Bayley. Mr. Bayley cannot thank you enough for sharing your kind words regarding Captain Claus. He has the utmost respect for the Captain and his decades of experience serving our brand. Captain Claus is currently assisting us in Miami with our investigation and will be returning to the Anthem of the Seas shortly. Mr. Bayley greatly appreciates you taking the time to write to him. Thank you for your continued loyalty and support for your brand. Best regards, Brittany Yochum Executive Guest Relations for Michael Bayley, President & CEO 305-539-6455 | BYochum@rccl.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xxHadleyxx Posted April 12, 2016 #19 Share Posted April 12, 2016 I would really hate to see this Captain thrown on the altar of PR. Given that NO regulatory agency has even once questioned the decision to sail, that even RCI has never said that he did wrong, but that THEIR procedures, which he followed, were in need of revision (which has still not been called for by any regulatory agency, it is the company's voluntary action), to throw this 17 year career with RCI down the drain is a shame. While there is spin to everything, I recall seeing that the Brilliance's Captain was older and closer to retirement, and that he publicly stated that he felt bad for the experience the passengers had, and decided he didn't want to possibly have to do that again, so retired. I agree with you. I very much hope RCI is above forcing out a career captain, who appears to have done an exemplary job in a tough situation, over some PR. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wolfcathorse Posted April 12, 2016 #20 Share Posted April 12, 2016 my source, who talked with someone very close to Capt Claus (close as in a family relative) said he's working with the start up team for Ovation now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pipo Posted April 12, 2016 #21 Share Posted April 12, 2016 Some congressmen were pushing for a NTSB investigation. Do they have jurisdiction on this? http://abcnews.go.com/US/ntsb-investigation-royal-caribbean-cruises-weather-troubles/story?id=36835883 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chengkp75 Posted April 12, 2016 #22 Share Posted April 12, 2016 Some congressmen were pushing for a NTSB investigation. Do they have jurisdiction on this? http://abcnews.go.com/US/ntsb-investigation-royal-caribbean-cruises-weather-troubles/story?id=36835883 This is simple headline grabbing by this Senator. No, they do not, for three reasons: There was no damage to the ship or substantial injury to any passengers, therefore, no NTSB investigation The ship is foreign territory. What the Senator was calling for was to investigate the Captain's decision in sailing. This decision was based on RCI's ISM (International Safety Management) system, which is required by SOLAS, and can be inspected by the USCG when the ship is in the US, but it is not approved by any agency in the US, nor can it be investigated by any agency in the US. This is the province of the "flag state" (the Bahamas) and the classification society (insurance underwriter). The NTSB only joins a maritime incident investigation as advisors, if requested by the USCG. Since the USCG had no jurisdiction in an investigation of the decision process, neither does NTSB. I really shake my head that lawmakers are not law "knowers". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
riclop Posted April 13, 2016 #23 Share Posted April 13, 2016 of the Anthem and that huge storm?Was he cleared of any wrongdoing? Is he back on the ship, or A ship? Never heard anything after that whole fiasco. Someone had to be held accountable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thetrail Posted April 13, 2016 #24 Share Posted April 13, 2016 He did go to Miami. Then flew right back and was on next sailingYou are 100 % incorrect....:rolleyes: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul65 Posted April 13, 2016 #25 Share Posted April 13, 2016 You are 100 % incorrect....:rolleyes: Not 100% incorrect. I believe the first sentence was accurate. He did go to Miami. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts