Jump to content

Elite Princess Cruiser tries NCL


azdmelani
 Share

Recommended Posts

Hi fellow cruisers!  My mom and I are back from sailing the Norwegian Star.  We had to work around her vacation schedule for work, and sadly were a week too early for the Sky Princess.  Wanted to post a review in the hopes it helps someone making a decision between the two cruise lines.

 

The Star is an older ship (debuted in June 2000) and though was recently refurbished still showed her age.  The cruise was round trip from Venice with stops in Kotor Montenegro, Corfu, Santorini, Mykonos, Argostoli in Greece and Dubrovnik in Croatia over one week.  Sadly due to recent events in Venice and the harbormaster we missed our stop in Kotor. Instead it was replaced with a "technical" two hour stop in Bar Montenegro, assuming to let staff embark/disembark.  We did not receive any credit for port taxes to our account (Princess has done this in the past).

 

Cabin:

We had an inside cabin and it was tight.  Princess handles the closet situation much better, with an open closet and shelves that allows for access without moving hanging items.  We missed the bathroom shelves for organization.   NCL gets points for the shower having a sliding door and not the dreaded clingy curtain.  Our steward was able to get us robes and extra hangers, which we also receive on Princess when requested.  No chocolates on the pillow each night.

 

The TVs were ancient with one, maybe two english movie channels.   Even the old Princess TV channels before the on demand system were a marked improvement.

 

Food:

This is a subjective category, so YMMV.  But food was so hit or miss (and mostly miss) on this ship.  We were offered one "free" item when booking and opted for the three free specialty restaurants.  I'm so glad because the main dining room food varied from average to inedible. The buffet was more spread out and clearly labeled than Princess but had the same food every day.  Most days there was no dining room open for lunch, just a pub like venue.  We tried it once, again fine.   Specialty restaurants were good (we tried Cagneys, agreed it was better than Crown Grill, Le Bistro and the Teppanyaki restaurant).  I'm glad our itinerary allowed for meals in port so we had a breaks to breakfast and lunch in the buffet.

 

While i appreciated that we can make reservations for our dinner before sailing, I didnt like scheduling my meals months in advance.  We spoke to others who were not informed they needed to book the specialty dining in advance and were only provided with 9-10PM options.

 

The buffet also closed by 10, with the pub open 24 hours and room service available (for a charge of 7.95).   No grab and go options like the international cafe.   Coffee for purchase was starbucks and similar to my sbux NYC prices.   No coffee card available, and even if you purchased the drink package was not included.

 

Ports:

This is really where NCL went downhill.  It was not the actual ports per se, but the way we arrived.  Time in ports was shorter than the normal Princess schedule, we knew this going into the cruise.   We knew we would tender in Santorini.  But we also had to tender in Mykonos and Dubrovnik (on previous cruises with Princess we docked in these ports).   That meant three mornings of waking up very early to wait in line for tender tickets as we had private excursions.  Do we really need to be in line for tender tickets at 7:30AM if we arent arriving in port until 2PM?  The last morning for Dubrovnik,  we were 4th in line, but the first person grabbed 42 (!) tickets which meant anyone behind them was put into Group 2.  They had issues with receiving tenders and despite being ready at 7 when we docked didnt make it ashore till 7:45 for an 8AM excursion.   The cruise line also shortened the (already short) time in Dubrovnik so we had to be back on board by 12 instead of 12:30.   

 

I am also used to the nice Port Guides Princess prepares and sticks in the Patter the night before a stop.  If you're sailing NCL, I would recommend downloading some offline maps because they do not provide any port guides in their daily information.  

 

I know this review sounds overly critical of NCL, but after 20 cruises on Princess I guess I have gotten used to a certain standard of cruising.  Maybe the newer NCL ships have better quality rooms with more storage space, better/additional food venues and more bang for your buck.  But if I can avoid it I would gladly never cruise NCL again.

 

 

 

Edited by azdmelani
spelling
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I totally understand.  We've tried NCL 4 times over the years, the last being Breakaway to Bermuda three years ago.  My DH and I said never again NCL.  We were disappointed in mostly everything.  Princess is in a completely different class in comparison.  Never been disappointed in our Princess cruises.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Lady Arwen said:

I totally understand.  We've tried NCL 4 times over the years, the last being Breakaway to Bermuda three years ago.  My DH and I said never again NCL.  We were disappointed in mostly everything.  Princess is in a completely different class in comparison.  Never been disappointed in our Princess cruises.

 

I was disappointed in every way, aspect, manner and form of cruising the Princess Grand a couple years back including leaky pipes in the aft bar area. Party at the SF Pier when she leaves next year.

 

But we did cruise Regal and was a better experience. We also cruised NCL Bliss last year and had a blast.

DSC02760.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, need2cruisesoon said:

 

I was disappointed in every way, aspect, manner and form of cruising the Princess Grand a couple years back including leaky pipes in the aft bar area. Party at the SF Pier when she leaves next year.

 

But we did cruise Regal and was a better experience. We also cruised NCL Bliss last year and had a blast.

DSC02760.jpg

Isn't it lovely that there is a cruiseline for everyone!   What works well for some, is a huge disappointment for others.  To each their own!

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

   My DH and I took an NCL cruise on the Breakaway from NYC to Bermuda.

We are Platinum on Princess. I am noting this only to explain that we are quite used. to Princess and appreciate how they do cruises.

     The one good thing about Breakaway was that it took us to Bermuda .

After this cruise,we took a Princess repositioning cruise from NYC to FtLauderdale. 

We were so very glad to return to Princess. No more NCL for us.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We were recently on NCL Escape to Bermuda and had a fabulous time.  While the mini suite was smaller than on a Princess ship: the entertainment, food and staff were much better on the Escape.

We are just getting off the Caribbean Princess and were not happy with quite a lot on this sailing.  The one thing we were shocked about was that there were lobsters served in the buffet tonight.  They were great and unexpected!!!

 

We will try NCL again in the future and will be on another Princess Cruise too.  
 

One last thing:  the meet and greet on NCL was amazing.  They have a bar set up with food and drinks and 7 officers come to it as well.  Princess kept canceling our M&G on this cruise.  Pretty crappy!

Edited by cheeseclan
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Lady Arwen said:

I totally understand.  We've tried NCL 4 times over the years, the last being Breakaway to Bermuda three years ago.  My DH and I said never again NCL.  We were disappointed in mostly everything.  Princess is in a completely different class in comparison.  Never been disappointed in our Princess cruises.

I'm impressed you made it 4 times!  Thanks for your feedback!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, need2cruisesoon said:

 

I was disappointed in every way, aspect, manner and form of cruising the Princess Grand a couple years back including leaky pipes in the aft bar area. Party at the SF Pier when she leaves next year.

 

But we did cruise Regal and was a better experience. We also cruised NCL Bliss last year and had a blast.

DSC02760.jpg

There are so many subjective factors for a cruise.  Regal Princess is one of my favorite ships and I'm glad you enjoyed!  My first Princess cruise was during the inaugural season on the Grand.  She is showing her age now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, cheeseclan said:

We were recently on NCL Escape to Bermuda and had a fabulous time.  While the mini suite was smaller than on a Princess ship: the entertainment, food and staff were much better on the Escape.

We are just getting off the Caribbean Princess and were not happy with quite a lot on this sailing.  The one thing we were shocked about was that there were lobsters served in the buffet tonight.  They were great and unexpected!!!

 

We will try NCL again in the future and will be on another Princess Cruise too.  
 

One last thing:  the meet and greet on NCL was amazing.  They have a bar set up with food and drinks and 7 officers come to it as well.  Princess kept canceling our M&G on this cruise.  Pretty crappy!

Good to know.  We missed the M&G on our cruise due to another activity we wanted to enjoy.   Thanks for adding your feedback.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you for your honest review. I too feel same as you.  We tried NCL 14 night out of Venice.  We enjoyed it; but most likely won't go back.  Why?  Their cabins are smaller than Princess, food was ok. My wife and I felt they tried to put out a good product, but for some reason we felt they just could not match the good feeling like we have with Princess.  As for Mykonos.  Only one ship can dock; so if you don't get there first, you have to tender. Dubrovnik is same;  they have room for two ships at the dock; then the rest of the ships tender by the walled city

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, azdmelani said:

Hi fellow cruisers!  My mom and I are back from sailing the Norwegian Star.  We had to work around her vacation schedule for work, and sadly were a week too early for the Sky Princess.  Wanted to post a review in the hopes it helps someone making a decision between the two cruise lines.

 

The Star is an older ship (debuted in June 2000) and though was recently refurbished still showed her age.  The cruise was round trip from Venice with stops in Kotor Montenegro, Corfu, Santorini, Mykonos, Argostoli in Greece and Dubrovnik in Croatia over one week.  Sadly due to recent events in Venice and the harbormaster we missed our stop in Kotor. Instead it was replaced with a "technical" two hour stop in Bar Montenegro, assuming to let staff embark/disembark.  We did not receive any credit for port taxes to our account (Princess has done this in the past).

 

Cabin:

We had an inside cabin and it was tight.  Princess handles the closet situation much better, with an open closet and shelves that allows for access without moving hanging items.  We missed the bathroom shelves for organization.   NCL gets points for the shower having a sliding door and not the dreaded clingy curtain.  Our steward was able to get us robes and extra hangers, which we also receive on Princess when requested.  No chocolates on the pillow each night.

 

The TVs were ancient with one, maybe two english movie channels.   Even the old Princess TV channels before the on demand system were a marked improvement.

 

Food:

This is a subjective category, so YMMV.  But food was so hit or miss (and mostly miss) on this ship.  We were offered one "free" item when booking and opted for the three free specialty restaurants.  I'm so glad because the main dining room food varied from average to inedible. The buffet was more spread out and clearly labeled than Princess but had the same food every day.  Most days there was no dining room open for lunch, just a pub like venue.  We tried it once, again fine.   Specialty restaurants were good (we tried Cagneys, agreed it was better than Crown Grill, Le Bistro and the Teppanyaki restaurant).  I'm glad our itinerary allowed for meals in port so we had a breaks to breakfast and lunch in the buffet.

 

While i appreciated that we can make reservations for our dinner before sailing, I didnt like scheduling my meals months in advance.  We spoke to others who were not informed they needed to book the specialty dining in advance and were only provided with 9-10PM options.

 

The buffet also closed by 10, with the pub open 24 hours and room service available (for a charge of 7.95).   No grab and go options like the international cafe.   Coffee for purchase was starbucks and similar to my sbux NYC prices.   No coffee card available, and even if you purchased the drink package was not included.

 

Ports:

This is really where NCL went downhill.  It was not the actual ports per se, but the way we arrived.  Time in ports was shorter than the normal Princess schedule, we knew this going into the cruise.   We knew we would tender in Santorini.  But we also had to tender in Mykonos and Dubrovnik (on previous cruises with Princess we docked in these ports).   That meant three mornings of waking up very early to wait in line for tender tickets as we had private excursions.  Do we really need to be in line for tender tickets at 7:30AM if we arent arriving in port until 2PM?  The last morning for Dubrovnik,  we were 4th in line, but the first person grabbed 42 (!) tickets which meant anyone behind them was put into Group 2.  They had issues with receiving tenders and despite being ready at 7 when we docked didnt make it ashore till 7:45 for an 8AM excursion.   The cruise line also shortened the (already short) time in Dubrovnik so we had to be back on board by 12 instead of 12:30.   

 

I am also used to the nice Port Guides Princess prepares and sticks in the Patter the night before a stop.  If you're sailing NCL, I would recommend downloading some offline maps because they do not provide any port guides in their daily information.  

 

I know this review sounds overly critical of NCL, but after 20 cruises on Princess I guess I have gotten used to a certain standard of cruising.  Maybe the newer NCL ships have better quality rooms with more storage space, better/additional food venues and more bang for your buck.  But if I can avoid it I would gladly never cruise NCL again.

 

 

 

Ditto to the last sentance NCL was a good line, those days are gone.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
 Share

  • Forum Jump
    • Categories
      • Welcome to Cruise Critic
      • New Cruisers
      • Cruise Lines “A – O”
      • Cruise Lines “P – Z”
      • River Cruising
      • ROLL CALLS
      • Cruise Critic News & Features
      • Digital Photography & Cruise Technology
      • Special Interest Cruising
      • Cruise Discussion Topics
      • UK Cruising
      • Australia & New Zealand Cruisers
      • Canadian Cruisers
      • North American Homeports
      • Ports of Call
      • Cruise Conversations
×
×
  • Create New...