Pcardad

I see this across the board on all major cruise lines. I think they would lose more than they would save by forfeiting the port fees just to save a bit of fuel......plus the PR risk is off the chart. The math doesn't add up. To be clear, shaving an hour off a port to once in a while is a coincidence...shaving it off most runs is evidence. I will find out.

Anything at or above 175% earns double nights... *Single guests earn double nights when traveling at 175% or higher single supplement" https://www.rssc.com/seven-seas-society

And you will get twice the nights credited to your RSS account.

This is basically accusing NCLH of fraud....by cancelling ports with no reason and not telling the guests, eating the port charges, and hoping to make up that lost cost in reduced fuel savings. You feel this is the most likely scenario?

In order to save money by "skipping ports" they would need to cancel the port with enough notice (months) that they get their money back for the port reservation. However, if you look on the port schedules for the ports, the ships are still scheduled to dock. So if they are NOT cancelling and recovering their money, how are they saving money?

I an not sure which rep you saw - but if you are in GA, it was probably either K.R. or L.T. (depending on your TA's agency). I have worked with both. Mike left the end of January and has not yet updated his Linkedin profile but I certainly wish him the best - he is a great guy. If it makes any difference, my experiences indicate that all cruise lines are still having issues Post Covid for a variety of reasons. Even Viking is seeking financing to cover debt and now, this just in, seeks an IPO to raise additional money. Viking Holdings files confidential draft for IPO 01:47 PM | Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. (NCLH) | By: Amy Thielen, SA News Editor Viking Holdings Ltd. confirmed on Friday that it has filed a confidential draft registration with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission for an initial public offering. The number of shares to be offered has not yet been determined. The cruise operator has reportedly engaged Bank of America (BAC), J.P. Morgan (JPM), UBS Group (UBS), and Well Fargo (WFC) as advisors, according to Bloomberg. The offering could be conducted as early as Q2 this year. Viking Cruises, based in Basel, Switzerland, provides river, ocean, and expedition cruises under three divisions. The company was founded in 1997 in St. Petersburg, Russia by Torstein Hagen. The company has raised $1B in funding over two rounds, the most recent $500M from private equity firm TPG and the Canadian Pension Plan Investment Board. More on CCL Industries Inc., Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings, etc. CCL Industries Inc. (CCDBF) Q4 2023 Earnings Call Transcript CCL Industries Inc. 2023 Q4 - Results - Earnings Call Presentation Royal Caribbean: Blowing Past Base Case Royal Caribbean Cruises prices upsized notes offering of $1.25B Royal Caribbean Cruises added as new long idea at Hedgeye

This is a perfect example of a lost opportunity. The cost is next to nothing and the PR would be great. Its been my experience that the redemption people (usually dancers) have instruction to generously round up because it is such a simple and cost-effective way to score lots of goodwill at the END of a cruise - which is the best time to get it. If Regent doesn't capitalize on this easy opportunity, they don't deserve the benefits.

Both Voyager and Mariner are scheduled for 17 days - that is a fairly large time block. I have heard some things and expect the upgrades to be very well received.

December 2025 for 17 days.

I've gotten them often as well as Qatar Airways.

Many states allow a minor to drink in the presence of their parent. https://www.webmd.com/mental-health/addiction/alcohol-laws

No argument from me but I will say it only takes a short time to see if a port is available and to book it vs. booking early enough to make sure you have a guaranteed spot.

No hate from me but I would be curious as to exactly what went wrong and what did the GM say/do about it when you discussed it with them?

The only thing consistent among these opinions is their inconsistency. 🤪

They "forget" to count when you redeem points...they can't very well charge you $1,500 per person per day and then skimp out and not give you a $6 t-shirt.

If guests are remaining on board, it is not a charter.

If they are remaining onboard it isn't a charter...

Probably a private charter...

Due to people in this age group often having foot issues, the crew is understandably lenient with footwear. The shoes you describe are fine.

I see that...but I don't see what the context was as I neglected to quote a particular post. I do know that there have been recent discussions about moving future WC's to the Explorer. I do know that both Mariner and Voyager have drydocks coming next year and that Mariner's was going to be "special". I also know that the next ship will be a new class of ship with a slightly different purpose.

I have no knowledge of that - nor have I posted about it. I could ask but I know Voyager has a drydock scheduled (17 days I think) late next year.

It won't be limited to racing...

Don't sweat it - Voyager is a wonderful ship and I wouldn't hesitate to go on her tomorrow.

Your TA does - that is the only way to delete an excursion.

Agreed! Regent allows and encourages families to cruise together. Seeking to block an age group that Regent allows would be like a guest trying to block those guests over 80. It's just ridiculous. As long as a guest behaves and follows the rules, they should be welcome.