jimbo5544

There are more than some that like them, which is fine. Icon is butt ugly.

Another entire issue…..yuck

Groan

Enjoy the perks. On our first, when we boarded and they said “welcome home” it meant as much to us as the other perks.

Seems like a plan to me. IF only…..

There are changes coming, what there are is certainly up for speculation. You raise a legitimate option (and possibly the easiest to implement. What makes one question all this is that they have had an eternity to modify the plan and as to date, have not. I would venture a guess that the reason is that is so is two fold. The first is building, testing and impl,ementing the system tht controls the new plan. Having come from a technology past I can tell you thinga like this take time, precious, expensive time. The second is selling ot to their faithful (a some less faithful posting on this very thread). Just MHO.

I have seen it done with cheers and bubbles programs literally hundreds of times. You will not have a problem.

Interesting report. Hope to hear more from those that experience it.

The dilemma you describe has been on growing, the increase in the level of repeat cruisers does have consequences, They say they are working the problem (the only way is the raise the bar), we shall see.

It is always interesting to read others views on topics. Sometimes they bring facts either not considers to the table or new or different views on the subject matter. I would agree that Carnival stayed out of the monstrosity of the seas, or the Epic mistake or what ever. Most cruise lines are public companies and work for their stockholders (equity and hopefully profitable earnings). Of course, the notable exception is MSC. How and why the Carnival Corp decides to play on the behemoth race (among their many lines) is in fact an interesting decision. As it has been stated, there are drawbacks to this huge class of ships (port capabilities, no tender capability, the remoteness to the sea, etc). In the case of Carnival (the corp) they have variables that the smaller, sometimes leaner companies simply do not have. https://www.carnivalcorp.com/corporate-information/our-brands Some may think their decision on whether to play or when to enter into the “fray” of the super builds is a detriment, some think it is wisdom. I look at wonder and icon and shake my head (not so much in wonder but of what cruising has become, one totally over the top ugly behemoth after another), and even cringe a little at Carnival having to finally get into the market. All that said, their (the corp, and the brand) reluctance to do so, maybe the best thing this mgt team ever did.

If the debate of “better” is offering the most to do, then I guess monstrosity (you determine the flavor of the week namesake) will always win. Your level and meaning of experience, is just that yours. Stating it as fact….well not in my view. It has been said many times, bigger (Oasis, Wonder, Icon, et al.), simply are not better to me. Not even close. Not for the robbery they are charging to sail a boring cruise on Icon or free on Oasis….JMHO, butt I will not state it as fact…

How amazing is that……

Gotta love CC, totally unrelated bashing…. Simply amazing. Is bashing hijacking a topic? Hmmmmm. Topic ship collides with pier, suddenly line (cruise line not mooring lines ) comparison comes up.

Fair point….

Now that sounds like a plan

yup

Good info.

Yes, I meant in comparison.

Sounds like a deal to me~!

JR, it is a “sitting fee”. They also call it lipstick on a pig.

Maybe we should wait for Carnival to make official comments.

You summed it up pretty well. I did not go into detail, and frankly did not know that the ship missed a refurb, but I thought she was in really good shape. Nice pics.

Amen to that

VERANDA in 11 port side.

WOW, you just made my day. I hope reading my review brought you a little joy. YOU can still cruise in your mind. Remember, memories are the ties that bind.