taxmantoo Posted August 9, 2011 #1 Share Posted August 9, 2011 Another positive step in the right direction... Easier to see every day who will eventually come up on top of this battle :D Citing changing passenger preferences, Norwegian Cruise Line has announced that it will prohibit smoking in cabins. The new policy takes effect January 2012. Smoking on balconies will still be allowed; however, cigar and pipe smoking in cabins and on balconies will be prohibited. NCL's announcement comes less than two months after Carnival Cruise Lines, Holland America and Princess Cruises revealed that more restrictive smoking policies were on tap. Norwegian's smoking policy already prohibits lighting up in all indoor spaces except the casino, where ashtrays and appropriate signage are displayed. Naturally, cigarette, cigar and pipe smoking will still be allowed in enclosed cigar bars found on Norwegian Epic, Norwegian Gem, Norwegian Pearl, Norwegian Dawn and Norwegian Spirit. Additionally, per current policy, passengers are allowed to smoke cigarettes, cigars and pipes in outdoor public spaces and open decks, where designated by the appropriate signage. This will not change. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrCruze Posted August 9, 2011 #2 Share Posted August 9, 2011 This is the way things are moving. My province in Canada has been smoke free for about a decade and it is always a shock when I travel because I am so used to everything being smoke-free. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krazy Kruizers Posted August 9, 2011 #3 Share Posted August 9, 2011 Thanks for the information. Just wish HAL would stop ALL smoking on the balconies/verandahs. All of our restaurants here can't even have smoking out on their patios -- it is the law. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tip Posted August 9, 2011 #4 Share Posted August 9, 2011 Thanks for the information. Just wish HAL would stop ALL smoking on the balconies/verandahs. So do I. It is the 21st Century. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CinWin Posted August 10, 2011 #5 Share Posted August 10, 2011 I also wish HAL would forbid smoking on verandas. I've had a couple of cruises spoiled for me when the smoke from the people next to our cabin seemed to be always out smoking on their veranda when we were on ours. :eek: The next cruise we take after this one on Nieuw Amsterdan will be on a ship whose cruiseline does not permit smoking on verandas. Cindy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eh2zed Posted August 10, 2011 #6 Share Posted August 10, 2011 NCL may be responding to their customer preferences but I suspect it has everything to do with Carnival family of cruise lines recent announcements. With all other major NA lines including RCi's RCCL , Celebrity and Azamara,being more restrictive, NCL simply could not afford to become the preferred line for smoking clientele. This would have started a downward spiral of non smokers leaving and smokers arriving from and to their line. This is the same reaction that has occured in other hospitality industries in regards to shifting smoking policies. NCL's decision is pre-emptive and defensive. Its simply good business. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Himself Posted August 10, 2011 #7 Share Posted August 10, 2011 I am a non smoker and have been for over 19 years. That being said, I think the Pendulem is swinging too far to one side. We have gone from the extreme that one could smoke anywhere to smokers can smoke no where. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IRL_Joanie Posted August 10, 2011 #8 Share Posted August 10, 2011 I am a non smoker and have been for over 19 years. That being said, I think the Pendulem is swinging too far to one side. We have gone from the extreme that one could smoke anywhere to smokers can smoke no where. Thank you!! My thoughts also:( Joanie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richie2pies Posted August 10, 2011 #9 Share Posted August 10, 2011 It would seem some people want to ban smoking EVERYWHERE. If it happens, they will find some other cause to espouse. These same people would be the first to complain if something THEY liked were to be frowned upon. Too much "Big Brother" going on in this world. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beebob1 Posted August 10, 2011 #10 Share Posted August 10, 2011 Seems clear as a bell to me! If anyone doesn't want to smell smoke on a balcony then don't book one, if you do then don't complain. It is clear as a bell where smokers can smoke. Leave balconies for smokers or those who don't mind. NCL has set the rules take the matter up with them not a smoker. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bramcruiser Posted August 10, 2011 #11 Share Posted August 10, 2011 It seems this topic is always being discussed ad infinitum. Its old and so are the constant discussions that go in circle until one of these threads get locked. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rare erewhon Posted August 10, 2011 #12 Share Posted August 10, 2011 Thanks for the information. Just wish HAL would stop ALL smoking on the balconies/verandahs. It would have been very easy for HAL to ban smoking on balconies/verandahs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
startwin Posted August 10, 2011 #13 Share Posted August 10, 2011 Seems clear as a bell to me! If anyone doesn't want to smell smoke on a balcony then don't book one, if you do then don't complain. It is clear as a bell where smokers can smoke. Leave balconies for smokers or those who don't mind. NCL has set the rules take the matter up with them not a smoker. So using your logic, the balconies are off-limits to non-smokers and those who prefer fresh air. That kind of smokers attitude is prevalent all around us... roads, beaches, sidewalks, parks - cigarette butts everywhere. Clear as a bell.... leave the balconies for those who enjoy fresh air. Keep the pollution inside your own home. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beebob1 Posted August 10, 2011 #14 Share Posted August 10, 2011 So using your logic, the balconies are off-limits to non-smokers and those who prefer fresh air. That kind of smokers attitude is prevalent all around us... roads, beaches, sidewalks, parks - cigarette butts everywhere. Clear as a bell.... leave the balconies for those who enjoy fresh air. Keep the pollution inside your own home. Not my logic NCL made the rules about balconies. Take it up with them :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rare JamesEM Posted August 10, 2011 #15 Share Posted August 10, 2011 I live in the smoking free zone of the US, SC, where there are very few restictions on smoking, yet most business restict smoking. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tip Posted August 10, 2011 #16 Share Posted August 10, 2011 So using your logic, the balconies are off-limits to non-smokers and those who prefer fresh air. That kind of smokers attitude is prevalent all around us... roads, beaches, sidewalks, parks - cigarette butts everywhere. Clear as a bell.... leave the balconies for those who enjoy fresh air. Keep the pollution inside your own home. Well said! It is certainly not "Big Brother" to expect clean air! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Topsham Posted August 10, 2011 #17 Share Posted August 10, 2011 I do not understand why the casinos on board HAL ships remain smoking areas. As the non smokers definitely outnumber those that do I wonder why HAL effectively giver over one of their major revenure earning areas to the smaller group? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
catl331 Posted August 10, 2011 #18 Share Posted August 10, 2011 ... yet most business restict smoking.Most likely because smoking costs many if not most businesses in a variety of ways. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LorraineP Posted August 10, 2011 #19 Share Posted August 10, 2011 On a couple cruises on adjoining balconies we found it annoying to sit on our balcony while next to us there was cigarette and cigar smoking. Why not have the balconies on one side of the ship for smokers so they don't annoy those who pay for the fresh ocean air and not secondhand smoke. Nothing like sitting on your balcony having morning coffee and next balcony over someone is smoking a cigar. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
secrui Posted August 10, 2011 #20 Share Posted August 10, 2011 I do not understand why the casinos on board HAL ships remain smoking areas. As the non smokers definitely outnumber those that do I wonder why HAL effectively giver over one of their major revenure earning areas to the smaller group? In answer to your question, my wife and I took a cruise on the CARNIVAL PARADISE when it was an entirely non-smoking ship. We are nonsmokers and enjoyed the cruise. However, you could have rolled a bowling ball through the bars and casino, and hit almost nobody. CARNIVAL at some point returned the PARADISE to a smoking limited ship. I was told that, in general, a significantly greater percentage of smokers frequent bars and casinos than nonsmokers. Even though you correctly observe that nonsmokers definitely outnumber smokers, it's not enough to make up the lost revenue that comes from banning smoking in casinos. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charles4515 Posted August 10, 2011 #21 Share Posted August 10, 2011 I do not understand why the casinos on board HAL ships remain smoking areas. As the non smokers definitely outnumber those that do I wonder why HAL effectively giver over one of their major revenure earning areas to the smaller group? I think they might believe the stereotype that non smokers don't gamble. I don't use the casino on HAL only because I can't stand the smoke and smell. I have been on one Celebrity cruise since they made their casinos non smoking and the casino was packed on that Celebrity ship. And the casino was much larger than the Veendam casino. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sail7seas Posted August 10, 2011 #22 Share Posted August 10, 2011 I live in the smoking free zone of the US, SC, where there are very few restictions on smoking, yet most business restict smoking. :rolleyes: What a shock. :eek: Private businesses have more sense than government. ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sail7seas Posted August 10, 2011 #23 Share Posted August 10, 2011 I think they might believe the stereotype that non smokers don't gamble. I don't use the casino on HAL only because I can't stand the smoke and smell. I have been on one Celebrity cruise since they made their casinos non smoking and the casino was packed on that Celebrity ship. And the casino was much larger than the Veendam casino. If they are counting how many smokers vs non-smokers use the casino, they have to know they are getting a skewed number. MANY non-smokers do not use the casino ONLY because they can't stand the smoke. I always used to play slot machines and sometimes roulette and had fun doing so. I no longer use the casino at all as the smoke chases me out. If I could play without getting hit with that stench, I would play again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flashopper Posted August 10, 2011 #24 Share Posted August 10, 2011 I do not smoke and hate the smell. I will never use the casino or other smoking area where the cruiseline makes their most money. I understand that some people have to have their addiction. It is very sad that they feel this is a "right" My sister died because of a smoker that felt it was her rught. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wayfairers Posted August 10, 2011 #25 Share Posted August 10, 2011 Most other things that are deadly are completely banned... asbestos, driving without a seatbelt... why not smoking? That is why I think it should be banned. I understand that it is a very addictive habit and many who currently smoke started smoking before anyone knew of the health problems associated with smoking. But, I don't understand why people my age (40s) and younger started smoking when they know it can kill you or shorten your life or degrade your life significantly. My father-in-law quit smoking about 20 years ago as soon as the doctor found early signs of lung damage. Now he has COPD. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.