Jump to content

Convince me.


jonthomas
 Share

Recommended Posts

Don’t think I’ve ever said anything about these measures being in place “indefinitely “. I agree with you pinotlover. The social impact of it going on too long is disastrous.

if we have a difference of opinion (and I’m not sure we have much), it’s in how long these measures can remain. They are all we have at the moment however. They should stay in place long enough to flatten the curve (and so allow the medical system to cope) but I agree with you wholeheartedly - the effects on society are immense and so at the earliest time possible, they should be relaxed.

Edited by DeanoNorthPerth
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Paulchili said:

Is that all? Just exactly what kind of schools do you envision without teachers and staff?

Somehow, Sweden's primary  schools are operating like normal.  Shouldn't each state's head of education look into that?  I don't think they are operating online schools like some of the colleges.  Brazil's primary schools are operating normally.  It is more of a question of how to protect the most-at-risk, not locking everyone up in their residences to protect them.  Vast majority of the population really do not need protection.  They should go back to work before there are no jobs to go back to.  This will be my last entry for this thread.  It seems that CC have already lock up one of the thread which I was active in and deleted some of my entries in another thread.  Don't want to have this thread locked up or entries deleted.  See some of you on other threads.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, deadzone1003 said:

Brazil's primary schools are operating normally. 

Brazil also has the most COVID cases in S America (more than triple the next country) and I am sure it will get much worse before it gets better - maybe they should re-think their philosophy

 

48 minutes ago, deadzone1003 said:

Somehow, Sweden's primary  schools are operating like normal

Maybe they were much better prepared than we were. Look at how well countries like S. Korea. Taiwan, Singapore and some others have handled this epidemic compared to us. Hence we cannot compare ourselves to Sweden or other countries than handled this much better than we did - we are not in the same position as yet.

Even Wuhan itself is now out of lock down - can we do that now?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I doubt Brazil was better prepared. NO one was prepared. All are doing the best they can.

Under communist/dictatorial /socialist  govts it is much easier to tell people what to do and those who criticize better beware of the consequences.

Not so easy to tell Americans what to do. We will criticize any decision to death. As it is  our right to do so.  That right can stand in the way of decision making. 

It can be paralyzing. No matter what decision is made it will be the wrong one according to many. 

Edited by jonthomas
spacing
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, jonthomas said:

Under communist/dictatorial /socialist  govts it is much easier to tell people what to do and those who criticize better beware of the consequences.

You are only partially correct. S. Korea, Taiwan and Singapore (mostly) are not any of the types of governments you listed above and have done very well.

You are also right in that we are OT. Back to the topic now.🙂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, Paulchili said:

Brazil also has the most COVID cases in S America (more than triple the next country) and I am sure it will get much worse before it gets better - maybe they should re-think their philosophy

 

Maybe they were much better prepared than we were. Look at how well countries like S. Korea. Taiwan, Singapore and some others have handled this epidemic compared to us. Hence we cannot compare ourselves to Sweden or other countries than handled this much better than we did - we are not in the same position as yet.

Even Wuhan itself is now out of lock down - can we do that now?

I thought my last entry was going to be the last, but I couldn't let Paul give you misinformation.  Yes, Brazil has the most Wuhan virus cases in South America.  Yes, 3 time more than the next country.  But, Paul didn't tell you that the country had only 1/10 of the population of Brazil.  (That country should be either Ecuador or Chile).  We should be asking how other countries are succeeding and if we can replicate that effort or protocol.  The reason for the lockdown is so that the disease do not overwhelm our hospital system.  The logical goal is to lockdown those people who are candidates for the ICU and let the others get back to work.  Some of those who go back to work will get sick with the virus, but they are the prime candidates who are not going to die or get to the ICU. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How bout Deadzone, Susie, Pinot and other liked minded individuals agree to be exposed, and if they need hospitalization it NOT be provided, only quarantine. If they survive then they've helped the herd immunity, or not, if they don't survive then they've sacrificed themselves for the greater good. 

 

You guys want to sign up under those terms? I don't. 

 

Oh, DZ, you really don't understand why your posts get deleted and threads locked? For someone as bright as you think you are it shouldn't be too hard to figure out. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

OMG

 How do you know who will get it & who will not

Young  healthy people are  dying from it

 

They are closing food processing  plants  where people have the virus

People are handling the food you eat   so how do you know  if you may catch it from infected meat/poultry/fish products ??

 

where does it end

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, deadzone1003 said:

but I couldn't let Paul give you misinformation.  Yes, Brazil has the most Wuhan virus cases in South America.  Yes, 3 time more than the next country.  But, Paul didn't tell you that the country had only 1/10 of the population of Brazil.  (That country should be either Ecuador or Chile).

Yes, that is true today but the final chapter for Brazil has not been written yet.

Lest we forget, as of March 14, 2020 (less than a month ago) US had only TEN deaths/day - look at what we have today. Much of it because of our late response to strict social distancing (like Brazil is doing now). Places that started early (Seattle, SF) are doing much better.

Also, I remember what a big fan of hydroxy-Chloroquin you are. Two countries (Brazil and Sweden) have now stopped their clinical trials due to high toxicity, side effects and deaths (Google it if you wish)

BTW - as for population comparisons - we now have 7 times the number of cases reported in China (and seven times the deaths) and China  has 4 times our population  - think about that.

Edited by Paulchili
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Paulchili said:

- as for population comparisons - we now have 7 times the number of cases reported in China (and seven times the deaths) and China  has 4 times our population  - think about that.

What many miss is that key word "reported"   Trusting in what china says is a very dangerous road to take..   China denied the disease even existed in December..  China denied CDC and western  help and as recent as  this week denied US medical researchers to any involvement   What China says is "propaganda" designed to serve china !

Too some embassy people reported that the Chinese government recently took delivery of 60,000 cremation urns.... Any guess....maybe plant roses in?   

 China is a communist dictatorship  who will say anything to win........Trusting  a government like that  is a mistake that Nevil Chamberlain made in 1939..

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Hawaiidan said:

What many miss is that key word "reported"   Trusting in what china says is a very dangerous road to take.

That is very true.

This coin has another side to it. We have absolutely no idea of how many cases we actually have as we rank very low (44th last time I heard) in number of tests/mill of population. That could be considered as under counting as well.

Edited by Paulchili
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Hawaiidan said:

What many miss is that key word "reported"   Trusting in what china says is a very dangerous road to take..   China denied the disease even existed in December..  China denied CDC and western  help and as recent as  this week denied US medical researchers to any involvement   What China says is "propaganda" designed to serve china !

Too some embassy people reported that the Chinese government recently took delivery of 60,000 cremation urns.... Any guess....maybe plant roses in?   

 China is a communist dictatorship  who will say anything to win........Trusting  a government like that  is a mistake that Nevil Chamberlain made in 1939..

and don't forget about China centric WHO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Hawaiidan said:

What many miss is that key word "reported"   Trusting in what china says is a very dangerous road to take..   China denied the disease even existed in December..  

I agree completely.  I do not trust for one minute what China is reporting.  There is no way that the US has 7 times the number of cases as China.  Censorship reigns in China. The government is manipulative and controlling.  For the number of deaths and new cases to drop off suddenly like they would like the world to believe is extremely unlikely.  How could it be if their incinerators have been running constantly?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, sunlover12 said:

I agree completely.  I do not trust for one minute what China is reporting.  There is no way that the US has 7 times the number of cases as China.  Censorship reigns in China. The government is manipulative and controlling.  For the number of deaths and new cases to drop off suddenly like they would like the world to believe is extremely unlikely.  How could it be if their incinerators have been running constantly?

Don't forget the cruise ship that was kept from docking in SF to keep the numbers down. I wouldn't say the US is as pure as the driven snow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah hard to let this go. 

 

You guys were supposed to convince me to cancel my new years cruise on the Riviera for Dec/Jan for 2020.

Well the price of it has come down, instead of cancelling I now have a new invoice for it. What a fool am I?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, clo said:

Don't forget the cruise ship that was kept from docking in SF to keep the numbers down. I wouldn't say the US is as pure as the driven snow.

The number on the ship was reported....that is why the princess ship was kept in " isolation"  so that the very vulnerable  population in San Fran and their  huge homeless population would not become a giant breeding ground......  Ya,  it was a pretty honest and transparent action. by the US. if you look at it honestly.......come on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Hawaiidan said:

The number on the ship was reported....that is why the princess ship was kept in " isolation"  so that the very vulnerable  population in San Fran and their  huge homeless population would not become a giant breeding ground......  Ya,  it was a pretty honest and transparent action. by the US. if you look at it honestly.......come on.

I like the numbers being where they are': Trump remarks on Grand Princess passengers – video

 

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/video/2020/mar/07/i-like-the-numbers-being-where-they-are-trump-video

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, Paulchili said:

That is very true.

This coin has another side to it. We have absolutely no idea of how many cases we actually have as we rank very low (44th last time I heard) in number of tests/mill of population. That could be considered as under counting as well.

A test is just that.  We know who is sick and can very well count those people.  Can't very well hide them in the closet, can we?   Have a very good idea of the numbers.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
 Share

  • Forum Jump
    • Categories
      • Welcome to Cruise Critic
      • ANNOUNCEMENT: Save $2,000 & Sail Away to Australia’s Kimberley
      • Hurricane Zone 2024
      • New Cruisers
      • Cruise Lines “A – O”
      • Cruise Lines “P – Z”
      • River Cruising
      • ROLL CALLS
      • Cruise Critic News & Features
      • Digital Photography & Cruise Technology
      • Special Interest Cruising
      • Cruise Discussion Topics
      • UK Cruising
      • Australia & New Zealand Cruisers
      • Canadian Cruisers
      • North American Homeports
      • Ports of Call
      • Cruise Conversations
×
×
  • Create New...

If you are already a Cruise Critic member, please log in with your existing account information or your email address and password.