Jump to content

Aurora Borealis Viewing


1eja
 Share

Recommended Posts

When it's dark

So, in the Northern hemisphere, sometime in December closer to the winter solstice.

usually very early in the morning like 2 -4 AM

It's also varies depending on solar flare activity

Helps to be up near or above the Arctic Circle

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Either Northern or Southern Hemisphere - from End of September to beginning of April - October and March has highest solar activity- hence the best months for Northern lights inside the Arctic Circle.

Viking Ocean and Fred Olsen does have Northern Light cruises - another option is Hurtigruten Coastal Voyages along the Norwegian coast.

Quite many options.

Edited by hallasm
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As you probably know, it's never a guarantee; if you see them, it's an incredible bonus. Still on my bucket list. 😊

 

Alaska cruises may provide you some viewing but again, nothing's certain. Last year (September) we were cruising when activity was "high" and we were so excited! Got up at 1 am and went out on deck and so did 100 other people. Sadly, it was not meant to be that time. Just for future and for anyone who is interested, here is an excellent website resource for Alaskan Aurora Borealis forecasting:

 

https://www.gi.alaska.edu/monitors/aurora-forecast

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, klfrodo said:

When it's dark

So, in the Northern hemisphere, sometime in December closer to the winter solstice.

usually very early in the morning like 2 -4 AM

It's also varies depending on solar flare activity

Helps to be up near or above the Arctic Circle

Hurtigruten, a Norwegian based line, guarantees you'll see it/them through March or they'll give you a free cruise the following season. We sailed them in March last year.

IMG_6756 - Edited (2).jpg

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hurtigruten, a Norwegian based line, guarantees you'll see it/them through March or they'll give you a free cruise the following season. We sailed them in March last year.
492289032_IMG_6756-Edited(2).thumb.jpg.7a635681db34c8f976de373d135c90d9.jpg


Clo, that is a heart-stopping photo! Was it taken with a plain old smartphone camera, or with the real thing? (My money is on the real thing, but it's nice to dream...)

Puppycandu-- my mom saw them in Vermont around 30-40 years ago. Freak occurrence. I was sooooo jealous!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, zauberflote said:

 


Clo, that is a heart-stopping photo! Was it taken with a plain old smartphone camera, or with the real thing? (My money is on the real thing, but it's nice to dream...)

Puppycandu-- my mom saw them in Vermont around 30-40 years ago. Freak occurrence. I was sooooo jealous!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

It's an eight year old, size of a pack of cigarettes, point and shoot camera. And it looked better in the photos than in person.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, clo said:

It's an eight year old, size of a pack of cigarettes, point and shoot camera. And it looked better in the photos than in person.


wow. DH has one of those, but he also recently broke down and replaced his overworked, underpaid 6-yr-old smartphone with one that has a phenomenal camera. Someday we will cruise in cold Arctic areas!! 
Wonder why they look better in photos? I've heard that before. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, zauberflote said:

Wonder why they look better in photos? I've heard that before. 

 

In general, cameras have a few features that let them handle low light well.  Digital cameras have variable sensitivity to light (ISO) that enables them to change how the sensor perceives incoming light.  In general, high ISO means you get more detail in low light, but with more image quality issues.  If you look at the images in this this thread on a sufficiently high resolution screen, you will see a grainy, fuzziness to them.  It is most noticeable in the darker areas.  That is the result of using high ISO.  Low ISO would produce a lot less of that fuzz, but wouldn't collect as much light--thus the aurora itself would be less impressive.

 

Depending on the camera, the sensor can also be quite large, meaning more area to collect light.  One weakness of cell phone cameras is the sensors need to be very small.  Manufacturers spend a lot of time and money on the software that processes the image the sensor takes in order to improve the quality as much as possible.

 

There are some other options available to take photos of dim objects, but the don't apply to most point and shoot cameras or cell phones.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
In general, cameras have a few features that let them handle low light well.  Digital cameras have variable sensitivity to light (ISO) that enables them to change how the sensor perceives incoming light.  In general, high ISO means you get more detail in low light, but with more image quality issues.  If you look at the images in this this thread on a sufficiently high resolution screen, you will see a grainy, fuzziness to them.  It is most noticeable in the darker areas.  That is the result of using high ISO.  Low ISO would produce a lot less of that fuzz, but wouldn't collect as much light--thus the aurora itself would be less impressive.
 
Depending on the camera, the sensor can also be quite large, meaning more area to collect light.  One weakness of cell phone cameras is the sensors need to be very small.  Manufacturers spend a lot of time and money on the software that processes the image the sensor takes in order to improve the quality as much as possible.
 
There are some other options available to take photos of dim objects, but the don't apply to most point and shoot cameras or cell phones.


Wow thank you! I have never studied up on the similarities between old film and new digital. For Mr ZF's SLR from the 60's or 70's we'd buy film of different ASA's, and set the (blessedly mechanical!) settings appropriately. It was expensive family photography, eh?
Apparently the three-lens new iPhone camera, and a similar Android one, are excellent for low light photography. He hasn't let me play with it yet [emoji6]


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
 Share

  • Forum Jump
    • Categories
      • Welcome to Cruise Critic
      • ANNOUNCEMENT: Set Sail Beyond the Ordinary with Oceania Cruises
      • ANNOUNCEMENT: The Widest View in the Whole Wide World
      • New Cruisers
      • Cruise Lines “A – O”
      • Cruise Lines “P – Z”
      • River Cruising
      • ROLL CALLS
      • Cruise Critic News & Features
      • Digital Photography & Cruise Technology
      • Special Interest Cruising
      • Cruise Discussion Topics
      • UK Cruising
      • Australia & New Zealand Cruisers
      • Canadian Cruisers
      • North American Homeports
      • Ports of Call
      • Cruise Conversations
×
×
  • Create New...