SakeDad Posted March 7, 2020 #801 Share Posted March 7, 2020 Originally they said ALL crew and passengers would disembark at a non-commercial port, be tested and anyone positive would be quarantined. But CNN just reported that the 1100 crew will not be allowed off the ship. No explanation. Wonder what the reason for that would be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cscurlock Posted March 7, 2020 #802 Share Posted March 7, 2020 1 hour ago, fragilek said: I think it will come down to costs (it almost always does). Who picks up the tab for the costs of any quarantine, testing, food, hospital bills, tracing of contacts. Any government could do this as a one off but not if it happens more regularly. Thus I think that covering costs will be part of any discussion - and that may be the bit that puts a halt on cruising. If they do go on in the near future then I think further restrictions on age and health may come into play To be honest the lack of communication here is the problem. The passengers should be told the process on what is going to happen. Considering we are well past the last ships outbreak a plan should have been drawn up on what will happen if someone gets it on a cruise ship. So people and the cruise industry know what the risks are. There should be an form you fill out saying, "I am ok with the risks'" after the medical questionnaire when boarding describing this process and it should be available on the cruise lines web site as well. Right now they don't even have a plan otherwise the crew and passengers would all know what is going to happen to them over the next month. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rare gottagocit Posted March 7, 2020 #803 Share Posted March 7, 2020 I wish people could leave their political views and opinions out of posts on this thread. It has the potential to be a helpful source of info for fellow cruisers. If I wanted to see or hear reports or comments written using only excerpts from a speech or comment by a political leader I would watch the news channel or read the website that supports political leaning. This isn’t a political board and shouldn’t be a place where things said by them is taking out of context to make it sound as though they was nefarious intent or are inept as possible. Can we please save those type of comments for a more political website and not sow them here. 17 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rare LMaxwell Posted March 7, 2020 #804 Share Posted March 7, 2020 8 hours ago, maizer said: Agree about treating them equally. However, if they spread out the 1100 employees across the 3500 total capacity ship, shut down ventilation, try to use balcony cabins only, perhaps being onboard would be adequate. Ships have proven to be excellent incubation grounds. Those measures aren't going to help. How would shutting down ventilation work? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain_Morgan Posted March 7, 2020 #805 Share Posted March 7, 2020 23 minutes ago, cscurlock said: To be honest the lack of communication here is the problem. The passengers should be told the process on what is going to happen. Considering we are well past the last ships outbreak a plan should have been drawn up on what will happen if someone gets it on a cruise ship. So people and the cruise industry know what the risks are. There should be an form you fill out saying, "I am ok with the risks'" after the medical questionnaire when boarding describing this process and it should be available on the cruise lines web site as well. Right now they don't even have a plan otherwise the crew and passengers would all know what is going to happen to them over the next month. I think part of the issue is the hubris which is on display across the industry....much like the infamous notion of the banks being too big to fail... I agree that the lack of communication is what makes any bad situation worse, but the lack of a plan for this sort of situation just magnifies the frustration as its not as if everyone (gov't and companies) haven't had a 'dress rehearsal' of sorts but it seems like a really bade case of deja vu! 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phil the brit Posted March 7, 2020 #806 Share Posted March 7, 2020 9 hours ago, CruisinCrow said: Not enough test kits. Not enough personnel to board the ship and administer 3000 tests. Not enough labs to run the tests. And not enough thought into the "cruise ship problem". What a mess, from no test kits available to not having enough masks. Who does these peoples thinking for them. After the Diamond Princess problem you would think there would be a pallet of masks in the hold. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caymus88 Posted March 7, 2020 #807 Share Posted March 7, 2020 3 hours ago, caribill said: a) Geared up to be able to test hundreds of thousands (or more) people for the virus. b) Arranged for the number of N95 maska that might be needed c) Prepare quarantine facilities on land to handle thousands of people d) Appoint someone to be in charge who is a medical professional with an epidemiological or other appropriate background. A million tests that were produced were defective so couldn’t be used Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
High C's Posted March 7, 2020 #808 Share Posted March 7, 2020 Forgive me if this has been asked (and answered), but I just wonder why we are not hearing about any issues of passengers with fevers and coughs on any other cruise line. Clearly this is not a Princess issue. How is this being handled on the other lines? I admit I don't read every post made on CC for all lines, but I am curious that there is nothing on the news about infected people tracing back to cruise ships other than the two "big" news stories (Diamond and Grand). A friend currently sailing on Azamara reported that they had to miss a port (Madagascar) as it was closed to ALL cruise ships. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoosierpop Posted March 7, 2020 #809 Share Posted March 7, 2020 (edited) 3 hours ago, caribill said: a) Geared up to be able to test hundreds of thousands (or more) people for the virus. b) Arranged for the number of N95 maska that might be needed c) Prepare quarantine facilities on land to handle thousands of people d) Appoint someone to be in charge who is a medical professional with an epidemiological or other appropriate background. a) The testing has been botched, but lack of testing didn’t create the outbreak on the ship. b) There are mask shortages all over the world. That’s not the government’s fault. Is it the government’s job to make sure everyone has a mask? Not to me. And lack of masks did not create the outbreak on the ship. c) why should the government create quarantine facilities to handle people going on cruise ships? And lack of quarantine facilities did not create the outbreak on this ship. d) silly talking point. I’m not saying this ship outbreak was inevitable. It’s possible someone missed something that enabled this to happen. But every person on that ship knew this could happen. And everyone who gets on any future cruises knows this could happen. That doesn’t mean it is their fault. But blaming the government for this situation is misplaced, IMO. Edited March 7, 2020 by Hoosierpop 10 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rare colesc15 Posted March 7, 2020 #810 Share Posted March 7, 2020 14 minutes ago, High C's said: Forgive me if this has been asked (and answered), but I just wonder why we are not hearing about any issues of passengers with fevers and coughs on any other cruise line. Clearly this is not a Princess issue. How is this being handled on the other lines? I admit I don't read every post made on CC for all lines, but I am curious that there is nothing on the news about infected people tracing back to cruise ships other than the two "big" news stories (Diamond and Grand). A friend currently sailing on Azamara reported that they had to miss a port (Madagascar) as it was closed to ALL cruise ships. Generally the demographic on Princess is considerably older than that on Royal Caribbean or carnival. Princess tends to do more exotic destinations as well compared to Royal Or carnival Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kathy49 Posted March 7, 2020 #811 Share Posted March 7, 2020 1 hour ago, phil the brit said: And not enough thought into the "cruise ship problem". What a mess, from no test kits available to not having enough masks. Who does these peoples thinking for them. After the Diamond Princess problem you would think there would be a pallet of masks in the hold. the lack of masks for crew serving and preparing meals is beyond belief. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlaskaBaked Posted March 7, 2020 #812 Share Posted March 7, 2020 Hi all - I discovered that Sirius radio has a new coronavirus station last night (121). I listened for a few hours and thought it was really interesting and pretty helpful. Last night, I felt totally prepared to board our Disney cruise on March 21st. After reading up on the Grand, I’m hesitating again but I think you might enjoy the station. 🙂 2 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
muffydawg Posted March 7, 2020 #813 Share Posted March 7, 2020 Princess and Carnival Corp are holding a media call later today March 7. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kathy49 Posted March 7, 2020 #814 Share Posted March 7, 2020 1 minute ago, AlaskaBaked said: Hi all - I discovered that Sirius radio has a new coronavirus station last night (121). I listened for a few hours and thought it was really interesting and pretty helpful. Last night, I felt totally prepared to board our Disney cruise on March 21st. After reading up on the Grand, I’m hesitating again but I think you might enjoy the station. 🙂 thank you will check it out. To stay current on what is going on I find Steve Lookner Agenda-Free TV very current. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fragilek Posted March 7, 2020 #815 Share Posted March 7, 2020 Another Diamond passenger has died today RIP www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/world-us-canada-51781573 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phil the brit Posted March 7, 2020 #816 Share Posted March 7, 2020 1 hour ago, Caymus88 said: A million tests that were produced were defective so couldn’t be used Well that's not very good is it. Total ineptitude, who employs these people, they let the faulty ones go out as well! 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rare Azulann Posted March 7, 2020 #817 Share Posted March 7, 2020 (edited) The first case of COVID-19 in Minnesota is a person who was on the previous Grand Princess Cruise that is now sitting off CA. Be smart, be safe and aware Edited March 7, 2020 by Azulann 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
resistk Posted March 7, 2020 #818 Share Posted March 7, 2020 (edited) 2 hours ago, phil the brit said: And not enough thought into the "cruise ship problem". What a mess, from no test kits available to not having enough masks. Who does these peoples thinking for them. After the Diamond Princess problem you would think there would be a pallet of masks in the hold. The Grand Princess has really messed up things in California. They have no test kits readily available, so the Goldren State is likely looking at a shut down, I can't imagine cruise lines operating unencumbered anymore. Profit and pleasure over global health? https://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/2020/03/06/coronavirus-grand-princess-disease-cluster-confirmed-cases-grows/ Edited March 7, 2020 by resistk 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phil the brit Posted March 7, 2020 #819 Share Posted March 7, 2020 You saw a possible need and had the foresight to get one. People who work for big companies (like Princess for example) did NOT think about it until too late. It was obvious weeks ago. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cscurlock Posted March 7, 2020 #820 Share Posted March 7, 2020 Does anyone know if Princess has a maintenance fee for when you are quarantined on their ship like NCL? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WIDisCruiser Posted March 7, 2020 #821 Share Posted March 7, 2020 (edited) Coast guard ship approaching the ship. Edited March 7, 2020 by WIDisCruiser 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sea2011 Posted March 7, 2020 #822 Share Posted March 7, 2020 1 hour ago, Hoosierpop said: But every person on that ship knew this could happen. And everyone who gets on any future cruises knows this could happen. I agree with this. And it should no longer be a personal choice or decision because it is not just risking quarantine/getting the virus/missing ports/facing protests - it is also risking another episode like this that can cost a lot of money, people and resources to manage. And this is costly not just to the host countries where the ship is but also other nations that need to send in planes, etc for evacuation. If they can lock down cities to contain the virus, there should be hard decisions made on cruises to contain the spread in order not to further strain limited resources to handle outbreaks and save lives. 12 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MoniMommy Posted March 7, 2020 #823 Share Posted March 7, 2020 12 minutes ago, cscurlock said: Does anyone know if Princess has a maintenance fee for when you are quarantined on their ship like NCL? Are you saying that if a passenger quarantined to yuh our room on NCL, the passenger has to pay a fee? I have never heard of this. How much is the fee on NCL? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kathy49 Posted March 7, 2020 #824 Share Posted March 7, 2020 8 minutes ago, Sea2011 said: I agree with this. And it should no longer be a personal choice or decision because it is not just risking quarantine/getting the virus/missing ports/facing protests - it is also risking another episode like this that can cost a lot of money, people and resources to manage. And this is costly not just to the host countries where the ship is but also other nations that need to send in planes, etc for evacuation. If they can lock down cities to contain the virus, there should be hard decisions made on cruises to contain the spread in order not to further strain limited resources to handle outbreaks and save lives. I really agree with this...no one NEEDS to cruise...it is a WANT and right now not really smart. It is just a matter of days before another ship has issues and probably be a different cruise line. The demographics of cruise passengers (other than school holidays) is older...the exact group that probably should be limited their exposure. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2wheelin Posted March 7, 2020 #825 Share Posted March 7, 2020 So every ship should have a pallet of masks aboard, along with testing kits, etc? Are all these products produced by snapping ones fingers or clicking your heels? One of the main reasons there is a shortage of supplies is from all the people who snatch them up just in case—when everyone knows masks are completely wasted on healthy people. We want crew to serve people in the buffet (I agree) but it has bee shown crew are much more likely to be infected than passengers. We believe crew are more sanitary so why would someone then be comfortable with ALL crew wearing masks. Remember, masks are for sick people. 4 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now