Princess mask update 2/18/22. Effective 3/1/22

[USCcruisecrazy]

18 minutes ago, FlaMariner said:

I'm thinking thru the "masks in certain areas" and wondering......

 

...is that there as a "catch all" in case they want to implement masks indoors again?

 

I'm trying to figure out how we leave our cabin without our mask and venture to another venue and then there is a sign that says "this area requires a mask" and my mask is back in my cabin....

 

(Again, thinking that's just a CYA notation, if needed but doubtful it will be needed)

 

What says the wise peeps on here?

 

I'm by no means wise, but I think you make a great point.  It could very well be a means to CYA in case anything occurs (like a few sick people being discovered on board)...it helps them have flexibility.  

[FlaMariner]

56 minutes ago, cltnccruisers said:

Might be in one place not needing one then decide to go to a show or something that does. 

 

That's why I'm thinking it is "masks optional" and they are saying "certain areas may require a mask" as a way to re-implement in case of rare situation and they can't say they did not tell us!  CYA. 

 

I'm not sure how practical it is for different venues to pop up as "mask required". 

 

I have not worn a mask since dis-embarking a cruise in December and I'm going to be in the "not wearing one and not carrying one around on the ship" group..........(But of course, if the rule changes back from optional to required, I will certainly comply because I would rather not walk the plank)

[cltnccruisers]

3 minutes ago, FlaMariner said:

 

That's why I'm thinking it is "masks optional" and they are saying "certain areas may require a mask" as a way to re-implement in case of rare situation and they can't say they did not tell us!  CYA. 

 

I'm not sure how practical it is for different venues to pop up as "mask required". 

 

I have not worn a mask since dis-embarking a cruise in December and I'm going to be in the "not wearing one and not carrying one around on the ship" group..........(But of course, if the rule changes back from optional to required, I will certainly comply because I would rather not walk the plank)

Walking the plank is so passe`.  They keelhaul you now.  🙃

[brisalta]

6 hours ago, IJustWantToGo36 said:

I don't spend any time in casino, but 2 weeks ago,  casino was DEAD

IF ship wants a profit center, they will allow gamblers to gamble.

 

Nothing is preventing gamblers from gambling.

[IJustWantToGo36]

1 hour ago, brisalta said:

 

Nothing is preventing gamblers from gambling.

If the gamblers don't want to wear masks in the casino, they won't go to the casino"

EASY!!!

[cr8tiv1]

There is no logic to that.  You are saying:

 

A person who wears a mask does not gamble.

 

Therefore, ALL  person who do not wear a mask gamble.

 

 

 

Edited February 24, 2022 by cr8tiv1

[brisalta]

14 minutes ago, IJustWantToGo36 said:

If the gamblers don't want to wear masks in the casino, they won't go to the casino"

EASY!!!

 

Then they are not real gamblers except with the spread of aerosol born disease!

I know people who refused to go to the casino to gamble because of the smoke who are now planning on gambling. I am pretty sure that the number of those people will make up for the whiny people who do not want to wear face coverings.

Edited February 24, 2022 by brisalta

[brisalta]

2 minutes ago, cr8tiv1 said:

There is no logic to that.  You are saying:

 

A person who wears a mask does not gamble.

 

Therefore, a  person who does not wear a mask gambles.

 

 

 

 

I see what you did there! Well done!

[cr8tiv1]

@brisaltaI've been waiting decades to make use of my "Yale" new math.  It was one of the first attempts at redefining the way math was taught (a very long time ago).  Since then, I "became" a math teacher and stuck by my "old math ways" with a sprinkle of new here and there.  That was one lesson that stuck in my brain for all of these years.  Thank you.

 

Revision 1.1:

 

A person who wears a mask does not gamble.

 

Therefore, ALL  person who do not wear a mask gamble.

 

Edited February 24, 2022 by cr8tiv1

[caribill]

56 minutes ago, cr8tiv1 said:

 

Therefore, ALL  person who do not wear a mask gamble.

 

 

 

 

 

Yes, as posted below

 

 

54 minutes ago, brisalta said:

 

Then they are not real gamblers except with the spread of aerosol born disease!

 

 

[ChaserX]

1 hour ago, brisalta said:

 

I see what you did there! Well done!

Oh no! Is this the dreaded undistributed middle term?

 

Sean

[Mike45LC]

3 hours ago, brisalta said:

 

I see what you did there! Well done!

I see what he/she/it did there, and it is not "well done".    I will not go further, to avoid a reprimand from the Board.  

[brisalta]

1 hour ago, Mike45LC said:

I see what he/she/it did there, and it is not "well done".    I will not go further, to avoid a reprimand from the Board.  

 

Whooosh

[MissP22]

12 hours ago, phabric said:

Today’s Princess webinar with Princes John Chernesky, Senior VP, North America on Facebook 

Is that video available for viewing?

I can't seem to find it.

[caribill]

50 minutes ago, MissP22 said:

Is that video available for viewing?

I can't seem to find it.

 

Try

 

[MissP22]

53 minutes ago, caribill said:

 

Try

 

Thanks.

All the ones I found were just older. 

[hllwdcruiser]

As I just posted on the testing thread: I just logged into our cruise personalizer and had to agree to the 2 day testing and masking requirements for our cruise on Monday:

Edited February 25, 2022 by hllwdcruiser

[englishtea]

44 minutes ago, hllwdcruiser said:

As I just posted on the testing thread: I just logged into our cruise personalizer and had to agree to the 2 day testing and masking requirements for our cruise on Monday:

He said everything would  update on the website on Tuesday March 1

[Host CJSKIDS]

I board the Regal tomorrow so will post whether or not they relax the mask mandates on March 1 mid cruise. 

[Steelers36]

38 minutes ago, Host CJSKIDS said:

I board the Regal tomorrow so will post whether or not they relax the mask mandates on March 1 mid cruise. 

John C stated in his webinar that the mask mandate changes for all on March 1 - even cruises underway.

 

[johnritt]

I hope all is getting better and that masks will be optional when we sail on March 5th.  But I'm still taking a bunch of them and expect to wear them in halls, elevators, and crowded areas anyway.  I knew that masks were required when I booked the cruise so masking is not a no go for me.  If it was, I wouldn't have booked a cruise.

[Host CJSKIDS]

On 2/25/2022 at 1:05 PM, Steelers36 said:

John C stated in his webinar that the mask mandate changes for all on March 1 - even cruises underway.

 

Thanks for that news. 

[PescadoAmarillo]

DH is on the Ruby Princess on a cruise that started 2/25 and they seemed to pre-condition the dropping of the mask mandate on the results of today’s COVID test, but whether they mean it will be able to be dropped later today, or on March 1 I’m not sure. 

[chamima]

5 minutes ago, PescadoAmarillo said:

DH is on the Ruby Princess on a cruise that started 2/25 and they seemed to pre-condition the dropping of the mask mandate on the results of today’s COVID test, but whether they mean it will be able to be dropped later today, or on March 1 I’m not sure. 

 

Are they testing all of the passengers?

Or just the crew?

[Host CJSKIDS]

I’ve been talking to some of the Crew members and many are hoping they also don’t have to wear a mask. They have not heard of it’s just guests or if they can relax.