Rare mr walker Posted January 17, 2022 #4601 Share Posted January 17, 2022 Last post from me on the Djokovic matter I promise. I think his parents need to get a good Serbian to English translation book. His mother said that her son was tortured in Melbourne & his father said he was assassinated by the Australian government! I can only imagine it was a translation/misunderstanding issue with these words, or they are complete loonies who need a good dose of reality. 2 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rare MicCanberra Posted January 17, 2022 #4602 Share Posted January 17, 2022 1 hour ago, mr walker said: Last post from me on the Djokovic matter I promise. I think his parents need to get a good Serbian to English translation book. His mother said that her son was tortured in Melbourne & his father said he was assassinated by the Australian government! I can only imagine it was a translation/misunderstanding issue with these words, or they are complete loonies who need a good dose of reality. I think it is a little of both, some things were Iost in translation and they are a couple of crazies. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Russell21 Posted January 17, 2022 #4603 Share Posted January 17, 2022 (edited) 18 hours ago, NSWP said: I wonder if the Australian Tennis Association running the tennis carnival had contacts in the government? Thus the visa granted initially. Then it all turned into a nightmare like Ruby Princess, the agencies blaming each other. At least the 3 judges on Sunday got it right, upholding the Minister's decision to deport the joker. I would not be surprised to find that the whole episode was a carefully timed saga from the minute he stepped off the plane to when he finally left. He was allowed to appeal, then he was told to go again carefully leaving just enough time for him to appeal again, and be rejected with enough time to catch a plane to Dubai on his way home the night before the match started. The final rejection was nothing to do with the rights or wrongs of the drama, just whether the Minister legally had the power to kick him out. Edited January 17, 2022 by Russell21 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aus Traveller Posted January 17, 2022 #4604 Share Posted January 17, 2022 France has stated that only fully vaccinated people (players, staff and spectators) will be allowed to enter the country for their Grand Slam tennis tournament in May. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NSWP Posted January 17, 2022 #4605 Share Posted January 17, 2022 16 minutes ago, Aus Traveller said: France has stated that only fully vaccinated people (players, staff and spectators) will be allowed to enter the country for their Grand Slam tennis tournament in May. Good policy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aus Traveller Posted January 17, 2022 #4606 Share Posted January 17, 2022 I have been looking at the Aust Government website regarding visas for sports professionals. One interesting point is that applications have to be made months in advance because of the time taken to approve the visa. I can't see where there is any mention of COVID vaccination or COVID tests. I suggest that the issuance of a visa does not necessarily give a person the right to enter Australia. They can be refused at the border for many reasons. Currently one of these is that a person has to show proof of vaccination. This is clearly stated on the Aust Government website. Apparently Novak Djokovic was aware of this, but it has been reported that he asked Tennis Australia for an exemption to vaccination on the grounds that he tested positive to COVID on 16th December. Tennis Aust gave him an exemption even though they had been advised in writing in November by the Fed Health Minister Mr Hunt that previous infection with COVID did not take the place of vaccination. I have to wonder why Novak Djokovic didn't apply to the Australian government for an exemption. 😉After all, they are the people in charge of allowing people to enter the country. I suggest that he applied to Tennis Aust because they had a vested interest in having him play at their tournament. I feel that the 'blame' for this debacle has to be apportioned between Mr Djokovic and Tennis Australia. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aus Traveller Posted January 18, 2022 #4607 Share Posted January 18, 2022 (edited) Here is an extract from an Aust government website regarding a visa giving permission to enter the country. You may not be able to enter Australia if you do not meet our health and character requirements. Meet our health requirements You need to meet our health requirement to get a visa to enter Australia. This applies to both permanent and temporary visa holders. You must be free from a disease or condition that: is a threat to public health or a danger to the community. may result in significant health care and community service costs to the Australian community may require health care and community services that would limit the access of Australian citizens and permanent residents to those services as they are already in short supply I looks like a visa is just a pre-approval given on information given well in advance, but the final decision on whether or not someone can enter the country, is made at the border. Edited January 18, 2022 by Aus Traveller Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aus Traveller Posted January 18, 2022 #4608 Share Posted January 18, 2022 44 minutes ago, Russell21 said: I would not be surprised to find that the whole episode was a carefully timed saga from the minute he stepped off the plane to when he finally left. He was allowed to appeal, then he was told to go again carefully leaving just enough time for him to appeal again, and be rejected with enough time to catch a plane to Dubai on his way home the night before the match started. The final rejection was nothing to do with the rights or wrongs of the drama, just whether the Minister legally had the power to kick him out. I don't think the saga was carefully timed. It was badly handled. After Novak Djokovic's first appeal was allowed, I think it would have been better if the Minister had let less time elapse before announcing the decision to once again revoke the visa. We don't know the reason for the delay. Was it in the hope the fuss would die down? Not likely. Was it so it would appear proper consideration was given to the matter? Maybe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aus Traveller Posted January 18, 2022 #4609 Share Posted January 18, 2022 The Aust government website states that "previous infection with COVID-19 is NOT accepted for the purpose of a medical exemption for travel to Australia. For anyone wanting to read the detail, it is set out below. Medical contraindication – Travellers coming to Australia Travellers who do not have a medical contraindication recorded in the Australian Immunisation Register must provide a medical certificate that indicates they are unable to be vaccinated with a COVID-19 vaccine because of a medical condition. The medical certificate must be provided by a registered medical practitioner (a doctor), be written in English, and must include the following information: your name (this must match your travel identification documents) date of medical consultation and details of your medical practitioner (that is, your doctor) details that clearly outline that you cannot have a COVID-19 vaccine because of a medical condition which means you cannot receive a COVID-19 vaccination (medical contraindication to COVID-19 vaccine). Requirements for Medical contraindication Medical conditions considered to be a contraindication to COVID-19 vaccination and accepted as reasons that you cannot be vaccinated for medical reasons for the purpose of travel to Australia include: Permanent A previous anaphylaxis after a previous dose of a vaccine where no appropriate COVID-19 vaccine is available Temporary For an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine, inflammatory cardiac illness within the past 3 months, e.g., myocarditis or pericarditis; acute rheumatic fever or acute rheumatic heart disease (i.e., with active myocardial inflammation); or acute decompensated heart failure. For all COVID-19 vaccines: Acute major medical condition (e.g. undergoing major surgery or hospital admission for a serious illness). Treatment with anti-SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibody or convalescent plasma therapy in the previous 90 days Any serious adverse event attributed to a previous dose of a COVID-19 vaccine, without another cause identified, and with no acceptable alternative vaccine available. If the vaccinee is a risk to themselves or others during the vaccination process they may warrant a temporary vaccine exemption. This may include a range of individuals with underlying developmental or mental health disorders. Conditions NOT considered to be a contraindication for COVID-19 vaccination and NOT accepted for the purpose of a medical exemption to vaccination for travel to Australia Chronic symptoms following COVID-19 ("Long COVID”). Pregnancy Previous infection with COVID-19 (PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection). People who have received non TGA approved or recognised vaccines should not be certified in this category and cannot be treated as vaccinated for the purposes of their travel. Guidance on acute major medical conditions that warrant a temporary medical exemption to vaccination is at ATAGI Expanded guidance on temporary medical exemptions for COVID-19 vaccines (health.gov.au). Note that a previous infection with COVID-19 is not a contraindication to vaccination ATAGI advice on the definition of fully vaccinated (health.gov.au). Penalties apply for providing false and misleading information to a Government official when entering Australia. For more information, please see COVID-19 and the border Australia Travel Declaration. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rare MMDown Under Posted January 18, 2022 #4610 Share Posted January 18, 2022 1 hour ago, Aus Traveller said: I have been looking at the Aust Government website regarding visas for sports professionals. One interesting point is that applications have to be made months in advance because of the time taken to approve the visa. I can't see where there is any mention of COVID vaccination or COVID tests. I suggest that the issuance of a visa does not necessarily give a person the right to enter Australia. They can be refused at the border for many reasons. Currently one of these is that a person has to show proof of vaccination. This is clearly stated on the Aust Government website. Apparently Novak Djokovic was aware of this, but it has been reported that he asked Tennis Australia for an exemption to vaccination on the grounds that he tested positive to COVID on 16th December. Tennis Aust gave him an exemption even though they had been advised in writing in November by the Fed Health Minister Mr Hunt that previous infection with COVID did not take the place of vaccination. I have to wonder why Novak Djokovic didn't apply to the Australian government for an exemption. 😉After all, they are the people in charge of allowing people to enter the country. I suggest that he applied to Tennis Aust because they had a vested interest in having him play at their tournament. I feel that the 'blame' for this debacle has to be apportioned between Mr Djokovic and Tennis Australia. Agree. I was very disappointed how Tennis Australia handled the Novak saga. Opening Rod Laver Court late at night, after the Govt's case was dismissed because of a technicality showed their true colours. So glad I didn't go to Australian Open because of Covid this year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Porky55 Posted January 18, 2022 #4611 Share Posted January 18, 2022 As I understand Visa Entry applications - the person applying for entry is solely responsible for the Visa, which is totally electronic. It is only checked if it is the right one, once the applicant lands in Australia, by airport Border staff. This is where I guess it fell apart for Mr D - when he was found to have the wrong details on his Visa - and he then commenced to defend his application, which was his right, but eventually he failed. 🤔 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NSWP Posted January 18, 2022 #4612 Share Posted January 18, 2022 2 hours ago, MMDown Under said: Agree. I was very disappointed how Tennis Australia handled the Novak saga. Opening Rod Laver Court late at night, after the Govt's case was dismissed because of a technicality showed their true colours. So glad I didn't go to Australian Open because of Covid this year. I think some of Tennis Australia hierarchy are too big for their boots. Heads should roll. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aus Traveller Posted January 18, 2022 #4613 Share Posted January 18, 2022 22 minutes ago, NSWP said: I think some of Tennis Australia hierarchy are too big for their boots. Heads should roll. Who the he.. did Tennis Australia think they were that they could issue an exemption to an Australian government regulation. This is a rhetorical question to which there is no answer.🙂 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ilikeanswers Posted January 18, 2022 #4614 Share Posted January 18, 2022 14 hours ago, Aus Traveller said: Apparently Novak Djokovic was aware of this, but it has been reported that he asked Tennis Australia for an exemption to vaccination on the grounds that he tested positive to COVID on 16th December. According to Djokovic his manager applied for his visa. So it would have technically been the manager who asked for the exemption, though Djokovic trying throw his manager under the bus clearly doesn't understand if your name is on the application it is your responsibility, not the person who fills it out😒. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Russell21 Posted January 18, 2022 #4615 Share Posted January 18, 2022 (edited) A possibly unthought of consequence has arisen, some of Novax's sponsors are apparently "Not happy Jan", particularly with the likelihood of no Roland Garros for Novax. Edited January 18, 2022 by Russell21 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rare lyndarra Posted February 3, 2022 #4616 Share Posted February 3, 2022 We know Uncle Les (NSWP) likes his lubbly-jubbly but will he be after the Chinese version. Queen's Platinum Jubilee Souvenirs Misprinted as 'Jubbly' | PEOPLE.com 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aus Traveller Posted February 3, 2022 #4617 Share Posted February 3, 2022 20 minutes ago, lyndarra said: We know Uncle Les (NSWP) likes his lubbly-jubbly but will he be after the Chinese version. Queen's Platinum Jubilee Souvenirs Misprinted as 'Jubbly' | PEOPLE.com That certainly is a typo!! Someone will have lost a lot of money over that mistake. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rare MicCanberra Posted February 3, 2022 #4618 Share Posted February 3, 2022 Would ruin my tea Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ilikeanswers Posted February 3, 2022 #4619 Share Posted February 3, 2022 7 hours ago, lyndarra said: We know Uncle Les (NSWP) likes his lubbly-jubbly but will he be after the Chinese version. Queen's Platinum Jubilee Souvenirs Misprinted as 'Jubbly' | PEOPLE.com The irony is one day that will be a collectors item and worth a fortune😂. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rare onlyslightlymad Posted February 3, 2022 #4620 Share Posted February 3, 2022 We had our Voyage to Straya wine night. It seemed to go well, a great buzz in the room. My favourite wine was the Mt Langhi Ghiran Cliff Edge Shiraz. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rare OzKiwiJJ Posted February 3, 2022 #4621 Share Posted February 3, 2022 1 hour ago, onlyslightlymad said: We had our Voyage to Straya wine night. It seemed to go well, a great buzz in the room. My favourite wine was the Mt Langhi Ghiran Cliff Edge Shiraz. I'm glad it went well. Yes, that shiraz would indeed be very nice. It's a long time since I've had a Mt Langhi Ghiran wine but I did like them. What other wines did you have? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rare lyndarra Posted February 3, 2022 #4622 Share Posted February 3, 2022 8 hours ago, ilikeanswers said: The irony is one day that will be a collectors item and worth a fortune😂. That thought crossed my mind. Geez, some people may prefer to buy it rather than the correct version. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aus Traveller Posted February 4, 2022 #4623 Share Posted February 4, 2022 10 hours ago, ilikeanswers said: The irony is one day that will be a collectors item and worth a fortune😂. Maybe the mis-printed Jubilee china won't be worth a fortune because there is too much of it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rare onlyslightlymad Posted February 4, 2022 #4624 Share Posted February 4, 2022 7 hours ago, OzKiwiJJ said: I'm glad it went well. Yes, that shiraz would indeed be very nice. It's a long time since I've had a Mt Langhi Ghiran wine but I did like them. What other wines did you have? Angove Organic Rose, McGuigan Short List Cabernet, Pikes Traditionale Riesling, Tempus two Botrytised. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rare lyndarra Posted February 4, 2022 #4625 Share Posted February 4, 2022 1 hour ago, Aus Traveller said: Maybe the mis-printed Jubilee china won't be worth a fortune because there is too much of it. If it was bought up by a single buyer they would have a choice of selling it all cheaply or destroy 90% and sell the rest at a BIG mark-up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now